Options
1919 Buffalo nickel NGC MS-WHAT??
I purchased this piece a while back on line listed with E-bay. This Buff has the assigned grade of MS-64 and started the bidding off at .99... Well, I won this coin and I must say every time I look at it I think to myself what a great purchase I made.. I'm sure it's closer to 65 than a 64. It's housed in one of those older NGC slabs. Now I don't know how you feel about this piece but I think it's just as nice as it gets for eye appeal strike and luster. This is a very sharp Buff and I wish I could find more of em. So, what do ya think of this one? Do ya think if I submitted this Buff to pcgs it would receive a 65? Thanks for looking and your time....CHD



The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
0
Comments
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
<< <i>Yowza - surprised NGC didn't give it a * either, for superior eye appeal. >>
If it's an older NGC slab, it may be pre-*. Sure deserves one though.
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
<< <i>send it to CAC instead and leave it alone >>
I like this idea!! Thanks for all the help...CHD
EAC 6024
Hold on to that one, it's definitely a keeper
Great look --solid strike and wonderful toning. My only question mark is that from the image, there is the possibility of high point friction on the reverse (see above and around the horn, for instance). You have it in hand and can quickly tell. If there's no wear, it looks like an upgrade. Really nice coin regardless of grade. And great photo.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
<< <i>Joe,
Great look --solid strike and wonderful toning. My only question mark is that from the image, there is the possibility of high point friction on the reverse (see above and around the horn, for instance). You have it in hand and can quickly tell. If there's no wear, it looks like an upgrade. Really nice coin regardless of grade. And great photo.
I can't locate any rub on this piece. Possibly a tad weaker in some areas on the reverse but I've seen worse in higher grades. Thank you for the complement on my imaging.....Joe
I think the CAC idea is a winner.
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
Gotta think it should go PCGS MS66, or 65+ at the least.
I've got two 1919 toners and yours is far superior to both.
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014