Crossing GAI 10 to PSA 10?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64f36/64f367e8203cefde1b925834f3a520c193386649" alt="Loyalty32"
Any chance? Has anyone ever successfully tried it? I'm far from an expert on grading or grading serives, but I know they don't have the best reputation. I appreciate any and all opinions.
Thanks
Craig
*Not mine. Just got curious when I came across the card.
Thanks
Craig
*Not mine. Just got curious when I came across the card.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c59f4/c59f4a6e42d63071787c4fae19c2da3f3c745b6d" alt="image"
0
Comments
If I was buying that card I'd value it at about PSA 7. There was a time when they were good (Mike Baker was in charge at PSA before leaving and forming GAI ) but there were issues.
At this point it's effectively 5 years minimum after GAI's demise, you have to ask yourself why is any given card in their holder? There are legit answers, but more often than not the answer is because it won't go into a PSA or SGC holder even at 2 grades lower.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
The card is graded accurately. It = PSA 10. Odds <5%
The card is overgraded. Would likely cross to PSA 8 or PSA 9 if cracked and resubmitted. Depends heavily on when submitted, etc. Odds ~40%
The card is whacked -- whether sheet cut, trimmed, damaged or something else, and the last owner believed it was more valuable in GAI 10 than in any comparable PSA grade that he could reasonably expect upon submission. Odds ~55%
M
Thanks
Craig
As for why anyone would go with GAI, I recall when GAI first got started. They made a pretty compelling pitch to give them a chance and were getting a fair amount of business.
slab and it came back PSA 8.5. I got a good deal on the price (ebay) on the card so I
was okay with the 8.5.
<< <i>Am I correct that the "First Graded" label applied by GAI was only for the first time the graded that card from that set, and not the first time they assigned that grade to that card? >>
It means it's the first time they assigned that specific grade to that specific card. So, there's also a 77 Dawson GAI 9.5 1st graded, a 77 Dawson GAI 9 1st graded, etc.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Correct.
BTW, is the smudge always prevalent on this card on Gene Richards (Gene)?
A 10 by GAI was suppose to be equivalent to pristine. Um, really?
At least the card fits nicely within the black insert with no large gaps which is a pretty good sign
that its not trimmed.
Now, to a success story:
I purchased a 1983 OPC Ryne Sandberg GAI 9.5 Gem mint for $99.99. I cracked it out of the case, subbed to PSA, and received a PSA 10 Gem Mint. A total gamble that payed off. It was in the same generation flip as the Dawson. Believe me, I have thought about doing it again, but would only be willing to risk $300 on the GAI Dawson.
Good Luck!
Mike
My #2 Ranked Michael Jordan PSA Basic Set
I would take a shot on that Dawson in a heartbeat...
Edit to add: But not at $1350...more like $300 like someone else said...
Forget blocking him; find out where he lives and go punch him in the nuts. --WalterSobchak 9/12/12
Looking for Al Hrabosky and any OPC Dave Campbells (the ESPN guy)