Do rim nicks =undesirable? Please take a look at these two coins

Hi all, how do most of you feel about rim nicks on coins? I understand that for some coins their is no choice due to price wise and rarity but what do you think of these two coins? Do the rim nicks detract from the look of the coin and the overall resellability??? Still like the coins or ?




Successful Buying and Selling transactions with:
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
0
Comments
I don't think they detract from your coins.
<< <i>Do the rim nicks detract from the look of the coin and the overall resellability??? >>
Any defect will affect resellability.
Also do you think CAC would sticker these two coins??
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>For those that collect trade dollars, does the rim nicks affect your opinion in buying these two coins if they were offered or would you still think these two coins are nice choice coins.
Also do you think CAC would sticker these two coins?? >>
IMO the xf40 would cac all day long and I don't see any marks on the rim and the vf35 may or may not CAC but it would most likely be due to the dark tone if it didn't which is a pet peeve of JA. The marks are period and grade appropriate/acceptable and the failure for a coin to CAC does not mean that it isn't a choice original coin. It simply means that JA isn't a buyer for that coin at that grade/price point. I don't think that affects/shrinks the pool of buyers as much as having a CAC sticker grows the base of potential buyers. The VF coin was crossed form an NGC slab to a PCGS slab and got a 5point bump in grade so there are 2 opinions from the TPG there too.
Mid range cir coins that are truly rare or scarce are often a confluence of compromises, once again looking at the next 100 73p's that come to market would reveal that they are indeed better preserved in the way that they are wayyyy above avg and near the top actually and among the few with unmolested surfaces.
They've got to be a bit rough before they catch my eye and not distracting at all in the coins you posted. Just my opinion..
I've got some in my collection that are real problems though and are much more obvious and sad to see in an otherwise very nice coin.
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>I was able to view in-hand the 1873 PCGS EF40 in the thread. Heck, that is even my image of the coin used for discussion. The coin has a trivial mark at 10:00 on the obverse, but it is nothing at all to me. >>
I see it now that you point it out, otherwise I wouldn'tve noticed.
60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
crap...give me a bargin priced chain cent with major issues if it still has eye appeal
when it comes time to sell
a bargin price is all i figure i'll get too...
it'd be kool to have an original 1794 flowing hair dollar hanging around my neck even if it had a hole ...carter could keep his...