Home U.S. Coin Forum

Could this 1929-D Buffalo could...go...all...of....the...way! Any chance?

Slabbed in an OGH at MS66, this 29-D has been hiding out in my bank SDB. Maybe I should have this one regraded.

What do you think? Would like some opinions from the resident Buffalo experts. I have no doubt this is one of the finest 66's out there, if not the finest, and if you compare it to the lonely 67, this coin has the potential to join it at the top.

Compared to this 1929-D in MS66+, I'd say a plus is a no-brainer



edited to fix link...

Comments

  • commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,096 ✭✭✭
    No shot at 67 IMO.

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • tightbudgettightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭
    If you want to try for the 66+, go ahead, but I don't think it has any shot at all for a 67. Don't be surprised if it comes back the same grade, too.
  • This content has been removed.
  • michiganboymichiganboy Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭
    If you could send it in the holder and have them leave it in if it don't upgrade. I think the TPG's are being a little tougher on giving high grades now, more then ever. I wish you the best of luck with it, its a nice looking coin.
    Positive BST transactions:michaeldixon,nibanny,
    type2,CCHunter.
  • mkman123mkman123 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭
    Send it to cac....if it gets the gold bean, you'll get crazy money
    Successful Buying and Selling transactions with:

    Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
  • GRANDAMGRANDAM Posts: 8,765 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>No shot at 67 IMO.

    -Paul >>



    -------------------------------

    image nice MS66 but not enough luster for a MS67.

    JMHO, GrandAm image
    GrandAm :)
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Send that in raw a few times and I'd not be the least surprised if it gets a 65 grade one of those times. That would seem a lot more likely than
    achieving a 67 grade. And this logic is not based on the coin so much but rather the current pops and variability in grading.

    The problem with comparing one's own coin against another specimen is that we don't know the particulars on how that other coin achieved its grade.
    What cycle of the market was it sent in, who sent it in, what coins were sent in with it, how many times was that coin tried, etc. While we all wish grading
    was so perfect that any 2 slabbed coins when compared, should always have the nicer coin in the higher holder....we know this is not the case. Based on the
    fact there is only a single MS67, and dozens of 66's, and now a single 66+, it suggests that the 66+ pop will slowly be allowed to increase. But I wouldn't
    bet on a 2nd MS67 any time soon unless it walks on water, has essentially a full strike, or has toning to die for. I'd have to think that PCGS holds the MS67 line
    quite hard when it comes to tough, mint marked Buffs in the teens and twenties. A 66+ based on that other coin might be a no-brainer in perfect conditions.
    I like the coin as well as how it compares. But grading and the "art" of coin submissions is not a perfect science.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    Fabulous strike for a 29-D. Not sure that it would go 67.


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,839 ✭✭✭✭✭
    great looking coin, I'm far from an expert on this series but I think roadrunner's advice is spot on. Even if its nicer than the lone 67 I could see a tpg citing the slight weakness of the shoulder as the hold back point.
    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.

  • The coin pictured actually has a better strike,IMHO,than the 66+ coin pictured in the link. Your coin,from your photo,lacks the luster
    needed for a "plus" or 67 designation.If you resubmit and it does not upgrade,you lose money.It's probably worth more in the OGH.

    Everybody's got plans--until they get hit
    --Mike Tyson
  • breakdownbreakdown Posts: 2,258 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the coin but would not risk the OGH. roadrunner's comments are spot on for this coin (and countless others).

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • ArizonaJackArizonaJack Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭
    Could be your pic but I just dont see 67 luster or pop.........
    " YOU SUCK " Awarded 5/18/08
  • RedneckHBRedneckHB Posts: 19,693 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The first grade that popped intoi my head when I saw the pic was 64.
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The first grade that popped intoi my head when I saw the pic was 64. >>



    For the 29-D, the difference between a 64 and a 65 is almost always detail on the Buffalo's head. As a result this coin at least 65!


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Crazy4CoinsCrazy4Coins Posts: 1,922 ✭✭✭
    Thanks for the feedback. I'm leaving the coin as is for time being. Probably will send it to the bean machine and see what happens.

    I've also come to the conclusion that my pics are pretty lousy. I've got to work on my photography skills. I'll repost better pics once I figure out how to shoot a good quality image.

  • capecape Posts: 1,621
    Well .... I've seen this coin in hand- it has a great luster and certainly a much better than most in Strike. This coin is an easy 66+++
    ed rodrigues

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file