Don't get me wrong, the 2012 has more athletic wings but the size of the 1992 team would crush the 2012 team. it would force them to be jumpshooters and that's a semi-weakness on the current team.
Wha??? A pro athlete talking smack prior to an event??
---------------------- Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989 ----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
He meant to say at their current ages, today's team would be the '92 squad.
Yeah, that's the ticket.
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
The only thing I never liked is that Latneer was on the team. Never understood why one college guy had to make it. That spot should have went to Wilkens I think. Can you image in Hakeem was on the Dream Team? Wow
Kobe Bryant was direct, in his very Kobe Bryant way. When asked to compare this 2012 Team USA — with himself, LeBron James, Kevin Durant and so on — and how it would do against the 1992 Dream Team with Larry Bird, Magic Johnson and Michael Jordan (a team with 11 Hall of Famers), he gave the answer you knew he would.
Kobe said he thought today’s squad would win.
Of course he did. Kobe has never stepped onto a basketball court thinking the team he was on wouldn’t win. That’s part of Kobe.
USA coach Mike Krzyzewski has a better, longer-term perspective (he was an assistant with the Dream Team) and was asked if this team could beat the legendary Dream Team.
“Right now I wouldn’t say that,” Krzyzewski said, referring to how the team looked after a few days of practices. “But this team can be very good. The one thing about this team they are all kind of in their prime or getting ready to go into their prime, and Kobe hasn’t lost anything. Whereas in ’92 there were guys at the end of their careers. Larry (Bird) had a hard time physically, John Stockton was hurt, Magic had been out a year. In their prime, all those guys together, there was no team ever like that.”
It’s an interesting point. That 1992 team did have a prime Michael Jordan plus Charles Barkley, Patrick Ewing (the 2012 team would struggle to slow him), Karl Malone and Clyde Drexler in his prime, among others. But the point that that Dream Team was not 1985 Magic or 1986 Bird is a valid one, we don’t always think of it that way because those guys were able to put on a show against inferior competition.
It’s also hard to judge teams across generations because the competition against them changed.
“The competitive nature of it is so much different (now than 1992), there is so much more competition now,” Coach K said. “Remember in ’92 not only were we ahead (in terms of basketball talent), but Yugoslavia split just before that, so they never put the Yugoslavian team together. And Russia split and became Russia and Lithuania. That would have been more competition. It’s not like the world was that far behind at the time, but the two best international teams in the world other than the United States, were split for the ’92 Games. Nobody is getting split before 2012.”
<< <i>Can you image in Hakeem was on the Dream Team? Wow >>
He wasn't an American citizen at the time.
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
Sorry, but the 1992 DT was an elite group that will never be duplicated again. Granted their level of competition wasnt quite what the international level is now, but the 92 DT would not lose a game against todays fields either. They were the last true basketball TEAM. Nowadays its 5 individuals. Its the main reason I have watched maybe 10 NBA games in the past 5 years, when I used to watch 10 or more a week
Edited to add: If you took the 92DT out of mothballs, even at their age, they would win the majority of the time
Of course he says they would beat the 92 team. What would you expect him to say?
These guys are ego driven alpha males, they never think that they can be beat. I'm sure that ever incarnation of the Dream Team since 92 believed prior to tip-off believed that they were the greatest too.
MJ received a nice chuckle from those comments. Today I heard a hypothetical line of the Dream Team -6. I'd be laying those points every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Good argument for down the road, but nobody could posibly know! the young people of today would agree with Kobe the people in rocking chairs like me would disagree but nobody will ever know and that's indisputable!!!
Can't wait to hear the questions the reporters will be asking Kobe after each game. God forbid if Team USA loses a game. Kobe has put himself and his teammates in a tough spot. The Dream Team didn't even come close to losing, although the competition wasn't what it is today.
Kobe is a tool. I don't like him, never have and I am in LA.
In his defense on the comment that's easy. Any top team from 2012 would beat the top team from 1992 in any sport. It's called evolution and the athletes are getting better all the time. Any argument is comical.
<< <i>Pretty sure the '92 2nd string would beet the 2012 Team. Kobe is an idiot, so is James and while I'll be rooting for the US team (of course) I will be the most impressed if they can, for once, act like gentlemen ... or at the very least just keep their mouths shut and let their play speak for them ... if they are so good after all ... >>
Kobe knows a hell of a lot more about basketball than you do.
In his defense on the comment that's easy. Any top team from 2012 would beat the top team from 1992 in any sport. It's called evolution and the athletes are getting better all the time. Any argument is comical. >>
I actually agree, the one thing that does it for me is the fact that Bird, Stockton and Magic were beyond their prime
Kobe and Lebron may be player #11 and 12 on the Dream Team. While athletes are stronger and faster......they are not as talented. Just watch baseball.....lack of skill makes me want to puke at times.
I'm going to make one point that maybe the biggest of them all.........Robinson and Ewing were dynamic players during that time period. We're talking upwards of 30 points per game, 13 rebounds and 4 blocks a night. The NBA has been so much about the smaller players that people forget how good the big men were 20 years ago. With Ewing and Robinson being a last line of defense the 92 team cruised every night. Those two guys went to block everything. They would have 10 fouls between them. Ewing and Robinson in their prime.......a thing of power and beauty. I've never seen a man as powerful as Patrick Ewing with that sweet touch. He could bump, grind and block with anyone and then go hit a turnaround fadeaway baseline jumper from 17 feet.
And by the way.......they were both good free throw shooters.
The 92 Dream Team was crazy. Remember when Chris mullin was scoring 25 points a year, for 5 or 6 years in a row? And he wasn't even one of the biggest stars.
-I think a 2nd tier 92 Dream Team would be competitive with the current squad. I.e. Dominique Wilkins, Hakeem?, Detlef Schrempf? Wouldn't you take him over James Harden?
The funny thing about the 92 Team, a lot of good players didnt even make the team. Moses Malone? He was way past his prime, but still, 3 time MVP. Parish, Isiah. Tim Hardaway was averaging 23 a game around that time.
---------------------- Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989 ----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this.
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
It's apparently already been run, geeks with computers being what they are, and the 92 team wins 53% of the time with a very small average point spread.
---------------------- Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989 ----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful?
To bigdcards: "you are right" - cpamike "That is correct" -grote15
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful? >>
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful? >>
Didn't say it was helpful, just that someone had run the sims.
---------------------- Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989 ----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful? >>
Didn't say it was helpful, just that someone had run the sims. >>
I was responding to the idea that we would get an answer.
To bigdcards: "you are right" - cpamike "That is correct" -grote15
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful? >>
Didn't say it was helpful, just that someone had run the sims. >>
I was responding to the idea that we would get an answer. >>
true, but this is Olympic basketball - 1972 proved that even playing the game won't guarantee an accurate answer.
---------------------- Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989 ----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
I don't get why this is even a story worth talking about, except on a slow work day.
A star athlete talking up the quality of his current team?? Unheard of!!!!
---------------------- Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989 ----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
It's not like he called a press conference to declare we are better than the 92 team. A reporter asked him a question---- How do you think you would do against the dream team. His answer after briefly discussing some of the pluses and minuses was---
"So I don't know," Bryant continued, the trace of a smile beginning to play its way across his face. "It'd be a tough one, but I think we'd pull it out."
What the %*&^ is an athlete of his stature going to say? I think they'd kick our &%%. I'm not a Kobe fan or hater. It was a "clown question" but he still gave a professional answer. I'm sure the dream teamers who are getting a laugh out of his answer didn't even bother to watch the interview. If they would have seen it they would understand the context of the answer.
A fifty plus point win today. Looks like they are going to try and prove themselves and into the history books with a 50 point average win difference. Haha, not! They'll get overconfident and lose to a team that has other NBA players on it.
<< <i>A fifty plus point win today. Looks like they are going to try and prove themselves and into the history books with a 50 point average win difference. Haha, not! They'll get overconfident and lose to a team that has other NBA players on it. >>
They were probably overconfident before and Kobe just gave them something to play for. Also, if a fifty point win against a terrible team doesn't count (and it doesn't to me), then the dream team never won a game. The strong opinions on this are very funny. Don't get me wrong, I'm enjoying the banter and like hypothetical sports debates, but people thinking they are "right" has me rolling on the floor.
And I'm rethinking my position on spiderman over batman. I think if batman could come up with something to get through spiderman's web, then he could distract spidey long enough for Robin to take a cheap shot with some type of weapon from the batcave. Actually, I'm confident that's what would happen.
To bigdcards: "you are right" - cpamike "That is correct" -grote15
<< <i>Kobe and Lebron may be player #11 and 12 on the Dream Team. While athletes are stronger and faster......they are not as talented. Just watch baseball.....lack of skill makes me want to puke at times. >>
If you think Lebron James would have been the 12th man on the Dream Team, you're kidding yourself. He would have started over an old Bird. John
Comments
My Podcast - Now FEATURED on iTunes
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
Yeah, that's the ticket.
i'd love to see any of those guys on the '92 squad keep Westbrook or CP3 outta the paint.
oh wait. basketball used to be about enforcers giving a forearm shiv to a driving guard without fear of repercussions. or concussions.
n/m.
Can you image in Hakeem was on the Dream Team? Wow
Kobe Bryant was direct, in his very Kobe Bryant way. When asked to compare this 2012 Team USA — with himself, LeBron James, Kevin Durant and so on — and how it would do against the 1992 Dream Team with Larry Bird, Magic Johnson and Michael Jordan (a team with 11 Hall of Famers), he gave the answer you knew he would.
Kobe said he thought today’s squad would win.
Of course he did. Kobe has never stepped onto a basketball court thinking the team he was on wouldn’t win. That’s part of Kobe.
USA coach Mike Krzyzewski has a better, longer-term perspective (he was an assistant with the Dream Team) and was asked if this team could beat the legendary Dream Team.
“Right now I wouldn’t say that,” Krzyzewski said, referring to how the team looked after a few days of practices. “But this team can be very good. The one thing about this team they are all kind of in their prime or getting ready to go into their prime, and Kobe hasn’t lost anything. Whereas in ’92 there were guys at the end of their careers. Larry (Bird) had a hard time physically, John Stockton was hurt, Magic had been out a year. In their prime, all those guys together, there was no team ever like that.”
It’s an interesting point. That 1992 team did have a prime Michael Jordan plus Charles Barkley, Patrick Ewing (the 2012 team would struggle to slow him), Karl Malone and Clyde Drexler in his prime, among others. But the point that that Dream Team was not 1985 Magic or 1986 Bird is a valid one, we don’t always think of it that way because those guys were able to put on a show against inferior competition.
It’s also hard to judge teams across generations because the competition against them changed.
“The competitive nature of it is so much different (now than 1992), there is so much more competition now,” Coach K said. “Remember in ’92 not only were we ahead (in terms of basketball talent), but Yugoslavia split just before that, so they never put the Yugoslavian team together. And Russia split and became Russia and Lithuania. That would have been more competition. It’s not like the world was that far behind at the time, but the two best international teams in the world other than the United States, were split for the ’92 Games. Nobody is getting split before 2012.”
No, but we have the same expectations of them.
<< <i>Can you image in Hakeem was on the Dream Team? Wow >>
He wasn't an American citizen at the time.
Edited to add: If you took the 92DT out of mothballs, even at their age, they would win the majority of the time
These guys are ego driven alpha males, they never think that they can be beat. I'm sure that ever incarnation of the Dream Team since 92 believed prior to tip-off believed that they were the greatest too.
Biggest non-story of the year.
you'll never be able to outrun a bad diet
but nobody could posibly know! the young people of today would agree with Kobe
the people in rocking chairs like me would disagree but nobody will ever know and that's indisputable!!!
Ebay Store:
Probstein123
phone: 973 747 6304
email: rickprobstein1@gmail.com
Probstein123 is actively accepting CONSIGNMENTS !!
God forbid if Team USA loses a game. Kobe has put himself and his teammates in a tough spot.
The Dream Team didn't even come close to losing, although the competition wasn't what it is today.
In his defense on the comment that's easy. Any top team from 2012 would beat the top team from 1992 in any sport.
It's called evolution and the athletes are getting better all the time. Any argument is comical.
MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
<< <i>Pretty sure the '92 2nd string would beet the 2012 Team. Kobe is an idiot, so is James and while I'll be rooting for the US team (of course) I will be the most impressed if they can, for once, act like gentlemen ... or at the very least just keep their mouths shut and let their play speak for them ... if they are so good after all ... >>
Kobe knows a hell of a lot more about basketball than you do.
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
<< <i>
In his defense on the comment that's easy. Any top team from 2012 would beat the top team from 1992 in any sport.
It's called evolution and the athletes are getting better all the time. Any argument is comical. >>
I actually agree, the one thing that does it for me is the fact that Bird, Stockton and Magic were beyond their prime
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
And by the way.......they were both good free throw shooters.
-I think a 2nd tier 92 Dream Team would be competitive with the current squad. I.e. Dominique Wilkins, Hakeem?, Detlef Schrempf? Wouldn't you take him over James Harden?
The funny thing about the 92 Team, a lot of good players didnt even make the team. Moses Malone? He was way past his prime, but still, 3 time MVP. Parish, Isiah. Tim Hardaway was averaging 23 a game around that time.
saucywombat@hotmail.com
<< <i>He meant "at rape" >>
"That's funny" - Daniel Tosh
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
It's apparently already been run, geeks with computers being what they are, and the 92 team wins 53% of the time with a very small average point spread.
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful?
<< <i>
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful? >>
maybe he meant DNA.
<< <i>
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful? >>
Didn't say it was helpful, just that someone had run the sims.
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful? >>
Didn't say it was helpful, just that someone had run the sims. >>
I was responding to the idea that we would get an answer.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I'm sure some statistics geek that heard this is right now running 10,000+ simulations of what that game would look like and by the time the Olympics are over, will have enough data to think he can answer this. >>
Why would data collected in totally different situations be helpful? >>
Didn't say it was helpful, just that someone had run the sims. >>
I was responding to the idea that we would get an answer. >>
true, but this is Olympic basketball - 1972 proved that even playing the game won't guarantee an accurate answer.
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
A star athlete talking up the quality of his current team?? Unheard of!!!!
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
>
Successful transactions on the BST boards with rtimmer, coincoins, gerard, tincup, tjm965, MMR, mission16, dirtygoldman, AUandAG, deadmunny, thedutymon, leadoff4, Kid4HOF03, BRI2327, colebear, mcholke, rpcolettrane, rockdjrw, publius, quik, kalinefan, Allen, JackWESQ, CON40, Griffeyfan2430, blue227, Tiggs2012, ndleo, CDsNuts, ve3rules, doh, MurphDawg, tennessebanker, and gene1978.
after briefly discussing some of the pluses and minuses was---
"So I don't know," Bryant continued, the trace of a smile beginning to play its way across his face. "It'd be a tough one, but I think we'd pull it out."
What the %*&^ is an athlete of his stature going to say? I think they'd kick our &%%. I'm not a Kobe fan or hater. It was a "clown question" but he still gave a professional answer.
I'm sure the dream teamers who are getting a laugh out of his answer didn't even bother to watch the interview. If they would have seen it they would understand the context of the answer.
In other news, Scottie also believes that if A > B and B > C, then C must be greater than A.
you'll never be able to outrun a bad diet
<< <i>A fifty plus point win today. Looks like they are going to try and prove themselves and into the history books with a 50 point average win difference. Haha, not! They'll get overconfident and lose to a team that has other NBA players on it. >>
They were probably overconfident before and Kobe just gave them something to play for. Also, if a fifty point win against a terrible team doesn't count (and it doesn't to me), then the dream team never won a game. The strong opinions on this are very funny. Don't get me wrong, I'm enjoying the banter and like hypothetical sports debates, but people thinking they are "right" has me rolling on the floor.
And I'm rethinking my position on spiderman over batman. I think if batman could come up with something to get through spiderman's web, then he could distract spidey long enough for Robin to take a cheap shot with some type of weapon from the batcave. Actually, I'm confident that's what would happen.
<< <i>Kobe and Lebron may be player #11 and 12 on the Dream Team. While athletes are stronger and faster......they are not as talented. Just watch baseball.....lack of skill makes me want to puke at times. >>
If you think Lebron James would have been the 12th man on the Dream Team, you're kidding yourself. He would have started over an old Bird.
John
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS