A couple of New Washington Quarters....Thoughts?

relicsncoins

I picked these up a couple of days ago. The luster on the 56 is blazing and my photo sucks. It's a type B reverse. The 48 S has some album toning. It's ok, but not crazy about it and it's the type of toning that might get bagged. It's in a second tier holder right now and is a point overgraded. What are your thoughts?

Being the 56 has the type B reverse which I think is pretty scarce in Gem and above, I might send it in. I think it falls in the 65 to 65+ range, but I think the hit on the forhead would preclude a anything higher.

joeykoins

Your right, the luster on 56 is dazzling!Nice pair.

harveypb

The 1956 Quarter is also a Type B Reverse!!!

ricko

I like the '56.... Cheers, RickO

1tommy

Thats a nice 56 type B and agree with the hit on the forehead, its still a real nice looking coin ms65 and I like the 48 too gonna say ms66 Glad to see your not going for the proofs yet as you seem to be picking up some nice washington's lately. Enjoy tom

crazyhounddog

Great looking coins. Washington quarters are really growing on me. I like em blast white. Really nice pick ups....Joe

DIMEMAN

Both are nice, but I like the 48-S better.

LeeBone

Both are nice coins

lasvegasteddy

sweet examples...i don't see it getting bagged either
should be easy 65's if not better

etexmike

Nice looking 56 but I love the look of the 48-S with the colors. Congrats on the pickups.


Mike

darktone

<< <i>65/65 >>




I agree. The milk spots on the obverse of the 56- very noticeable in hand? I could see 66 if it looks good in person.

metalmeister

Nice Washingtons. My buddy started collecting them, then I jumped in.
They are addictive. Buy all you can in the 30's at the current price enviroment.

LotsoLuck

PCGS 64-55

LanceNewmanOCC

<< <i>Both are nice, but I like the 48-S better. >>