Bought another really sharp '71 baseball set
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef4c3/ef4c3d306e878e11e9c9336a4c1489f6a2c4c833" alt="corvette1340"
Set averages NM with a lot of NM/MT. Will be subbing around 50 of these. Most of the commons I'll sub are in the 8 possible 9 range. The only drawback is that PSA is so backlogged. I have another 109 '71's as part of a sub that is on business day 32 right now.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90246/902462d4e74ae1b693de3cb980150bcfd0d07ff6" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90246/902462d4e74ae1b693de3cb980150bcfd0d07ff6" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/facb2/facb29807382fa19b25b05f02f15222ca2246f6f" alt="image"
0
Comments
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
<< <i>NICE! How are the Munson and Nettles? >>
Munson 6 'ish and Nettles 8 'ish, but OC. Might bring a straight 7.
JK. Great pickup Tommy, this one looks better than the one in Charlotte.
"Live everyday, don't throw it away"
<< <i>All trimmed!!
JK. Great pickup Tommy, this one looks better than the one in Charlotte. >>
It's probably around the same condition overall. The Charlotte one had more submittable cards but I gave less for this one than the one in Charlotte. The Mays card needs to be upgraded in this set.
<< <i>I don't get it. That 1971 set is one of my all time favorites, but I wouldn't buy a set after seeing the Nolan off center card. It would have turned me off. The Aaron though would have got me even though also OC. Why buy a set like this with the bankroll you have ? What will a PSA 6 OC 71 Ryan bring besides hassle of selling ? >>
Lol, what don't you get? I paid $1500 for the set. I'm grading around 50 of them, of which I'll sell the 9's and low pop 8's and keep the 7 and 8 stars with the set. I'll then have around $1200 in the set or less and I'll sell it for $2500. Game over
The Ryan is a straight 7 or 8 OC by the way
<< <i>ok epawn guy. I get it. Boner buy without brain to hold off. 1500 hundred ? That set sucks it looks like. >>
Says the guy who just joined and whose forum name means $hit in Spanish, lol.
Black boarders all around are a great part of this hobby!!
Nice pick up!
<< <i>
<< <i>ok epawn guy. I get it. Boner buy without brain to hold off. 1500 hundred ? That set sucks it looks like. >>
Says the guy who just joined and whose forum name means $hit in Spanish, lol. >>
Lol! Please don't feed the alt's!
<< <i>
<< <i>ok epawn guy. I get it. Boner buy without brain to hold off. 1500 hundred ? That set sucks it looks like. >>
Says the guy who just joined and whose forum name means $hit in Spanish, lol. >>
Almost every post from Cucka has been ignorant, negative, or degrading..
I think he uses IND's. Probably an Alt.
"Live everyday, don't throw it away"
Either way I sincerely wish you the best of luck with the set.
On a side note KaKa, share your opinion ofcourse but try to be a little more respectful maybe?
I don't submit anything that the bottom line won't increase by being graded. The exception are low pop commons that will fetch a premium that can be replaced with NM examples that don't downgrade the set. All part of the formula
<< <i>I was being conservative with those numbers. If I happen to hit a couple of homeruns with a low pop 9 or two then I could score really big. I have a formula for buying sets and flipping that have made me a ton over the last few years. I also have a formula for building sets that makes money but it's more work and a little less profit margin. I'm really liking these '71 sets. I made $1700 on the last one I bought and resold.
I don't submit anything that the bottom line won't increase by being graded. The exception are low pop commons that will fetch a premium that can be replaced with NM examples that don't downgrade the set. All part of the formula >>
Understood, I wasnt taking in consideration the low pop possibilities that Im sure would be very profitable if you land a few.
I know you know what your doing and again I wish you the best of luck!
I want to see some gems!!
<< <i>Booo. What are you doing now. PICS!!
I want to see some gems!! >>
Laying on the couch, lol
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
1971 Topps Please.
<< <i>
<< <i>Booo. What are you doing now. PICS!!
I want to see some gems!! >>
Laying on the couch, lol >>
Are you off the couch yet?
"Live everyday, don't throw it away"
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
Mark
T206 Set - 300/524
<< <i>Would love to hear a few more details on the formula
You know first hand how good the other one works. The reverse formula is even better with much less time and work.
Great looking 71s, good luck on the grades tommy.
Maybe May and Russell as well
Nice pickup
<< <i>Scanners always make any dark boardered card look worse. They always look better in person. >>
Yeah, and a blacklight makes them look even worse than a scanner. Loupe the edges and corners and see how you feel.
<< <i>.
On a side note KaKa, share your opinion ofcourse but try to be a little more respectful maybe? >>
Got it, quick learner here. One can't be talking here like he's known folks for ever or like at the office. I got it and will take your advice. Please excuse the too blunt input above.