Hypothetical Discussion -- The Initial Reaction to a Republican win will be a decline in PM prices
MsMorrisine
Posts: 33,014 ✭✭✭✭✭
A Republican win will be seen as good for the economy and bad for PMs, at least initially.
12 months later? that might depend upon the economic progress.
PS: It can't be but so good if the Republican budget proposal does not eliminate the deficit.
12 months later? that might depend upon the economic progress.
PS: It can't be but so good if the Republican budget proposal does not eliminate the deficit.
Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
0
Comments
<< <i>A Republican win will be seen as good for the economy and bad for PMs, at least initially.
12 months later? that might depend upon the economic progress.
PS: It can't be but so good if the Republican budget proposal does not eliminate the deficit. >>
So, based on your theory, an Obama re-election would be bad for the economy but good for PM's, Does this mean if we hold PM's we should vote for Obama?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
perceptions.
the current perceptions are the Republicans are pro-business and good for the economy.
If you hold a lot of PMs and little in other investments, yes, vote blue. Although bonds may rally as people flee other stuff.
But, you do not address your own perceptions of these perceptions I perceive.
Do you think PMs will sell off on a Republican win?
I think the worst case is a split Congress, as it is now, and a Democrat President. However, I'm for that for previously mentioned reasons. 1. Can't let Reps. justify their debt ceiling actions with a Presidential win, and 2. we got to force these partisan morons to work together.
I continue to add PMs in part because I expect 0bama will win re-election.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/liberty-head-2-1-gold-major-sets/liberty-head-2-1-gold-basic-set-circulation-strikes-1840-1907-cac/alltimeset/268163
"Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey
I have a couple strong opinions. I can read tea leaves.
Obama will be re-elected without my vote. It will be favorable for PM's.
In God We Trust.... all others pay in Gold and Silver!
I knew it would happen.
That's a brain teaser.
<< <i>No affect on PMs. They both got us into this mess and they will both keep us in this mess. Both big spenders, just spend on different things. >>
It doesn't, or won't, matter.
type2,CCHunter.
<< <i>I do not expect him to get a second term. I know there are many who say he will, and I can follow their logic. However, elections are not always 'logical', and, although politically speaking, there is a very long way to go, I believe the general malaise that exists (and if it continues) will ensure a new occupant of the White House. Cheers, RickO >>
Totally agree. Unless the economy really takes off this summer, Obama won't be reelected.
Remember our current events, there will be more crises if required.
–John Adams, 1826
but if the economy is in the tank, I think more people will want Obama out and Romney in.
I'm thinking the tipping point is at 7.x% unemployment. If we can get it into the 7's, Obama may just pull it out.
Either way, this is going to be another exciting and hard fought election year.
<< <i>Romney has this sleazy politician feel, much more than Obama
but if the economy is in the tank, I think more people will want Obama out and Romney in.
I'm thinking the tipping point is at 7.x% unemployment. If we can get it into the 7's, Obama may just pull it out.
Either way, this is going to be another exciting and hard fought election year. >>
Wow what a statement. A devout Mormon vs. a Chicago politician, and you are saying the Mormon is sleazier than a life long politician from Chicago? Wow. Wow. Wow. Three wows. If that is the case, there is no hope for Romney. The Obama machine will have $2 billion to spend on attack ads, plus 90% of the working press in their pocket, including powerful allies at Google and Facebook. If the perception is already that low of Romney, wait until those vicious no-prisoners attack ads and bogus made-up slime stories in the mainstream are running 24/7.
Obama is as ruthless as people come, and he will not give any quarter in the general. Obama is definitely the favorite. If he can't win by legitimate means, he will use Chicago-style tactics such as bus loads of union members sent in to vote 10x each in key districts with IDs of dead people. Obama also has Wall Street in his back pocket, despite rumors to the contrary. The PPT (plunge protection team) and their allies will do whatever is necessary, such as manipulating oil prices lower, or artificially boosting the stock market, to reelect their guy, President Goldman Sachs.
<< <i>No affect on PMs. They both got us into this mess and they will both keep us in this mess. Both big spenders, just spend on different things. >>
Took the words out of my mouth
...
<< <i>A devout Mormon ... >>
stop right there...
I guess your going to tell me religious anything, Rabbi, Priest, Preacher, etc., can't be accused of child molestation or any other crime, much less lying?
<< <i>No affect on PMs. They both got us into this mess and they will both keep us in this mess. Both big spenders, just spend on different things. >>
With the exception of obama, both parties seem to put forth moderate candidates. Neither controls spending. --Jerry