Options
Sold a problem Chain cent to fund this one.....

This was my first Chain. AG3 details, re-engraved details on obverse. It was tough to say goodbye, but it had to be done.


And with the proceeds.... said hello to this one
This is the tougher S1 or Ameri variety. Most in lower grades are very rough. This coin in hand is a dark chocolote brown and the planchet is quite decent. The only areas where there is minor porosity is in front of the portrait, and around the A in Ameri. Sadly the date is gone which is unfortunately common with lower grade examples of these. The reverse details are VERY strong. The only other defect are some rim bumps which go with the grade. Im not 100% sure but I think there may be a cud over the "TATE" in States. Will have to ask some EAC experts about that as I know its a rarity.

Thanks for looking!
Ankur


And with the proceeds.... said hello to this one

This is the tougher S1 or Ameri variety. Most in lower grades are very rough. This coin in hand is a dark chocolote brown and the planchet is quite decent. The only areas where there is minor porosity is in front of the portrait, and around the A in Ameri. Sadly the date is gone which is unfortunately common with lower grade examples of these. The reverse details are VERY strong. The only other defect are some rim bumps which go with the grade. Im not 100% sure but I think there may be a cud over the "TATE" in States. Will have to ask some EAC experts about that as I know its a rarity.

Thanks for looking!
Ankur
All coins kept in bank vaults.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
0
Comments
It doesn't look dark chocolate. Fix the images. And get it reslabbed if you can't polish out the distraction on the reverse!
Lance.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
My guess is that the number would be higher than many collectors would think, but still tiny.
Definitely like your upgrade, Ankur. Give any thought to having the coin slabbed with the chain side up?
<< <i>Is there a reasonably accurate estimate out there of the TOTAL number of genuine Chain cents in existence?
My guess is that the number would be higher than many collectors would think, but still tiny.
Definitely like your upgrade, Ankur. Give any thought to having the coin slabbed with the chain side up? >>
I would guess there are over a thousand problem chain cents out there.
Reslabbing with the chain up? Probably not.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
<< <i>I would guess there are over a thousand problem chain cents out there. >>
I'd say that there are almost three thousand of them if you include to the total dogs that are out there. I've seen a few with just a couple of chain links on the the reverse, and many others with very bad surfaces. Finding a smooth brown one is the trick.
I would not be sorry to the coin you replaced go, Ankur. That one was truly a "Billy Sunday" coin that would be a Condition 1 (BS-1) in most any EAC's opinion.
<< <i>PS-I likely don't have to tell you this but be careful talking to EAC experts.............they generally will nit pick your favorite piece of copper to death! Alas, they serve a purpose I suppose.
Amen, brother, I hear ya on that and agree!
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
merse
<< <i>Nice upgrade, Ankur. Was that Tom Hyland's coin? >>
Nope, but he wants to buy this one
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
<< <i>Im not 100% sure but I think there may be a cud over the "TATE" in States. Will have to ask some EAC experts about that as I know its a rarity.
I am not an expert, however....
The LDS of the S.1 variety (AMERI.) has a rim break (cud) over TAT, not ATE.
I'm fairly certain what you are seeing are simply rim bumps rather than a cud. If it were the cud, it would be shifted counterclockwise. There is a very good picture of it in Noyes, and it does not resemble your coin. I tried to find an example on HA that I could show you, but gave up after looking at two dozen examples.
Congrats on your NEWP....Mike
Jacob
<< <i>Great coin! Thanks for Sharing you should have kept both coins!
I know where Ankur is coming from when it comes to keeping both coins. The financial aspects of doing that can really limit your other projects. When I upgraded my Gobrecht dollar from PR-60 to 62, my first piece was a die alignment IV example which most numismatists view as a restrike. The PR-62 was an original alignment I piece, which really appealed to me. It would have been nice to have kept the alignment IV piece to show as a comparison between the two, but I really needed the money I got from selling it for other far different pieces.
I actually sold the thing about 30 years ago. Now I wish I had kept it.
Maybe one day I'll get a nice Fair or About Good specimen. How much are those going for these days?