i will soon be in the market for a 52 topps mantle....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d845/1d845af1404b849f10351cb938cfe00f5f149970" alt="benderbroeth"
what is the best way to get one, without spending 5,000 on ebay for a garbage psa 1 ? i will be looking to spend somewhere between $2,000-3,000, i will be in the market in a few months but thought since this will be such a large purchase to start looking now. thanks
0
Comments
are you looking for one graded?
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
<< <i>what is the best way to get one, without spending 5,000 on ebay for a garbage psa 1 ? i will be looking to spend somewhere between $2,000-3,000, i will be in the market in a few months but thought since this will be such a large purchase to start looking now. thanks >>
If you get one below $3000 that is PSA graded anything please direct me to the seller so I can buy the rest of his inventory of Mantle's. I gave over $11,000 for my PSA 5 a few years back and have owned a couple of 1's and 2's. I've never gave less than $3000 or even heard of a graded one selling for below that.
looking for low grade t205's psa 1-2
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
Ebay Store:
Probstein123
phone: 973 747 6304
email: rickprobstein1@gmail.com
Probstein123 is actively accepting CONSIGNMENTS !!
12/15/11 eBay cardsandcoins579 i***0 Best Offer $4,150.00
10/31/11 eBay mphcls90nc 4***a BIN $5,900.00
10/28/11 eBay bearcat-doug d***3 BIN $4,295.00
8/1/11 eBay dcreek1 -***t Best Offer $4,350.00
7/28/11 Huggins & Scott $5,287.50
6/26/11 eBay dalezkardz e***r 42 $3,729.00
5/27/11 Legendary 37 $7,170.00
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." Dr. Seuss
Here is a PSA 2 that just sold last month for $6,500.
1952 Mantle
For the price range you have outlined it would seem you will need to be looking for a totally mangled example in an AUTH holder.
Here is an example of an SGC 1 and even it is $3,600.
1952 SGC 1
I would save up another 5k or so if you are going to be looking to buy one and have a decent example.
<< <i>What am I missing here? Have you not been in the market for this card for a few years and just did not realize the price ranges?
Here is a PSA 2 that just sold last month for $6,500.
1952 Mantle
For the price range you have outlined it would seem you will need to be looking for a totally mangled example in an AUTH holder.
Here is an example of an SGC 1 and even it is $3,600.
1952 SGC 1
I would save up another 5k or so if you are going to be looking to buy one and have a decent example. >>
your sgc example is the same as another one being sold by tobgun cards.....???????????
looking for low grade t205's psa 1-2
The point was you are hoping for a back to the future moment to pull of getting a Mantle for $2,000 and maybe as high as $3,000.
You will just to need to put together more funds if you want the card. Period.
The majority of 1s, 2s, and 3s are ugly. We're talking terribly OC, sometimes paper loss, scuffs or creases that mar The Mick's face, etc. If you examine VCP scans, like with any card, you will see that the better-presenting examples will sell for a significant premium.
Case in point:
Normal 3s will cost what they do on average. This 3 would never be had for VCP avg. The same holds for any grade's avg examples versus the standouts...
I thank the card gods every day for the small crease at the bottom of this card. A fellow collector once said that is the best place ever for a crease on a 52 Mantle. Without that crease, which I hardly notice in hand, the card would have cost me so much more. Finding a 52 Mantle in presentable low grade is a long process, and when you find The One You Want, you need to jump all over it with the swiftness and be prepared to go over VCP avg.
One day I hope to sell this one and step up to Probstein's staggeringly gorgeous PSA 7. Sure looks like an 8 to me!
Why not try for a 51 Bowman instead?
<< <i>Bender
Why not try for a 51 Bowman instead? >>
Not a bad idea. You could get a nice looking PSA 3 or 4 within (or close to) your budgeted range. I'd much rather have that than a '52 Topps example that looks like hell.
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
The 51 Bowman is where I'd put my money. I would if I didn't have the 52 (Bowman) already.
Steve
<< <i>The 52 Topps is an over rated, double printed, pumped up 2nd year card.
The 51 Bowman is where I'd put my money. I would if I didn't have the 52 (Bowman) already.
Steve >>
All of this may be true but the 52 Topps is THE Mantle card everyone wishes they had. The 1951 Bowman is nice but the 52 Topps is the card that makes the eyes go wide!! I understand his want for the 52 Topps even if it isnt really a true rookie card!
While it's true the 52 Topps is a DP-- that's a bit specious of a criticism of the card. The demand for that iconic card clearly far outstrips the DP factor.
In the end, it's what the OP desires most. There's personal preferences, sentimental value, aesthetics, so many individual factors that go into who chooses what card to buy.
Edit: in my opinion, the only solution when it comes to which of those two Mantles to own is GET'EM BOTH! They are both awesome. One is his true RC, which features a pleasant, idyllic cloudy background. The other has been anointed by the zeitgeist as THE postwar card. It's his first Topps card, and Topps became the dominant company. It's also, to many, an aesthetically pleasing image, with the bold background and more detailed pic of the subject than the 51 card.
<< <i>The 52 Topps is an over rated, double printed, pumped up 2nd year card. >>
Doesn't the fact that it's from the high # series far outweigh the fact that it's double printed?
<< <i>$ 300 >>
I think that one spent a few years next to Butch Coolidge's father's watch.
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
looking for low grade t205's psa 1-2
<< <i>Doesn't the fact that it's from the high # series far outweigh the fact that it's double printed? >>
I don't think so. It's not like it's scarce or anything. It's price point is where it is
because the Mick played in NY and during the 80's it was pumped up by NY dealers and shakers. Don't get me wrong
it's an iconic card, for sure. It's value IMO seems almost illogical if you compare it
to many of his contemporaries.
<< <i>All of this may be true but the 52 Topps is THE Mantle card everyone wishes they had >>
See 'pumped up'
<< <i>
<< <i>All of this may be true but the 52 Topps is THE Mantle card everyone wishes they had >>
See 'pumped up' >>
I dont think pumped up. I have been collecting since 1973 and by 1978 when I was 14 years old wished I had a 52 Mantle. All my friends wished they had a 52 Mantle and this was when the only thing you would see about baseball cards is the ads in the back of the Sporting News and Baseball Digest for companies who will fill your sets for 5 cents per card. We lived in rural, northern Illinois and knew nothing of the hype but knew of this card. The first time I saw one in person in the very early 80's with Jim and Steve's cards in Waukegan, Illinois when Jim had shows in his living room (yes, living room) my eyes went wide and I could not wipe the drool off of my face. I believe at that time it was a $500 card but it could have been a million as I knew I could never get something like that. In my mind it may not be a rookie but it is a iconic hobby card that lives up to what 14 year olds dreamed it would and should be.
There may be some hype surrounding this card but there is also allot of grown up 14 year olds who who would love to own this card. I will never own one because I cannot see paying such a price for any card but for those who can afford it because its their dream to own it, I say go for it and enjoy it!!
Print runs are important but it does not matter here as the pool of buyers is constantly growing. This is the card of the last sixty years period.
The price range for baseball cards have expanded exponentially since the 1980's and it only makes since that this card followed suit and perhaps led the charge.
With hard assets growing in popularity I only see higher prices for this card going forward. The 1951 may be a better value but this card has captured the hearts of collectors for years and it is the Mantle to own for sure.
the true rookie, that card would have been the card of the Mick to own.
Instead, because the 52 was more abundant and most collectors at the time
had grown up with Topps, the 52 was the logical card to hype/pump.
Everything everyone has said here is true, I don't dispute any of it.
My only point is explaining why IMO it is why it is.
Steve
Always looking for Mantle cards such as Stahl Meyer, 1954 Dan Dee, 1959 Bazooka, 1960 Post, 1952 Star Cal Decal, 1952 Tip Top Bread Labels, 1953-54 Briggs Meat, and other Topps, Bowman, and oddball Mantles.
looking for low grade t205's psa 1-2