That's a split-off clad layer, very much a Mint error and desirable to a collector. This is one of the few times where I'm stumped for a value, though.
Sean Reynolds
Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
That's a split-off clad layer, very much a Mint error and desirable to a collector. This is one of the few times where I'm stumped for a value, though.
Sean, that alone makes it worth a small fortune..........
<< <i>That's a split-off clad layer, very much a Mint error and desirable to a collector. This is one of the few times where I'm stumped for a value, though.
<< <i>That's a split-off clad layer, very much a Mint error and desirable to a collector. This is one of the few times where I'm stumped for a value, though.
<< <i>That's a split-off clad layer, very much a Mint error and desirable to a collector. This is one of the few times where I'm stumped for a value, though.
Sean, that alone makes it worth a small fortune.......... >>
One Hundred Bazillion if I recall correctly!
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
I have a Jefferson nickel that is the same. The planchet split the coin into two separate halves. I have the reverse half. Wish I had the obverse half.
From looking at the reverse on the nickel I think the nickel dates to the 1970's.
Comments
Heehee.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
That's a split-off clad layer, very much a Mint error and desirable to a collector. This is one of the few times where I'm stumped for a value, though.
Sean, that alone makes it worth a small fortune..........
<< <i>That's a split-off clad layer, very much a Mint error and desirable to a collector. This is one of the few times where I'm stumped for a value, though.
Sean Reynolds >>
$0.05 since the front half is missing, right?
Cool to find!
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
<< <i>
<< <i>That's a split-off clad layer, very much a Mint error and desirable to a collector. This is one of the few times where I'm stumped for a value, though.
Sean Reynolds >>
$0.05 since the front half is missing, right?
Cool to find! >>
Yah, half dime!
<< <i>That's a split-off clad layer, very much a Mint error and desirable to a collector. This is one of the few times where I'm stumped for a value, though.
Sean, that alone makes it worth a small fortune..........
One Hundred Bazillion if I recall correctly!
The name is LEE!
A very interesting and cool error.
I have a Jefferson nickel that is the same. The planchet split the coin into two separate halves. I have the reverse half. Wish I had the obverse half.
From looking at the reverse on the nickel I think the nickel dates to the 1970's.
Ron