Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, and 1954 Proof Sets in Original Boxes

RampageRampage Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭✭✭
Good deal at 10% back of bid? Bad deal at that? Nice original coins in these. I have an opportunity to buy a set and was wondering. Seems to be okay given eBay sales prices. Just wanted the opinions of those folks here. Thanks.

Comments

  • shorecollshorecoll Posts: 5,447 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think that's a decent deal for a collector price.
    ANA-LM, NBS, EAC
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,683 ✭✭✭✭✭
    In original boxes? Yes, I think that's a good deal.
    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,711 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For nice coins in nice original packaging? I would say buy them.
    TD
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • If you can see the coins and they look good I say go for it, if they are sealed go for it. Problem is I have seen far too many hazy and ugly toned proof sets that required a dip. If they are hazy or ungly toned then 10% back isn't enough for me to have to deal with it.
  • UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you don't want them, I'll buy them!
    I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
    Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
  • Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146
    Wouldn`t original-sealed boxes go for over-bid, not back of bid?
    red flag!
    image

    oh, you can see the coins? look nice, etc. ?
    go for it!
  • coindeucecoindeuce Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you can view the coins (opened boxes) make certain that the individual coins are still in the original cellophane sleeves, with a single mini-staple securing the top of all 5 sleeves together. Anything other than that signals tampering/replacement coins.

    "Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
    http://www.american-legacy-coins.com



  • << <i>If you can view the coins (opened boxes) make certain that the individual coins are still in the original cellophane sleeves, with a single mini-staple securing the top of all 5 sleeves together. Anything other than that signals tampering/replacement coins. >>

    .



    If like that. BUY. THEM


  • << <i>If you can see the coins and they look good I say go for it, if they are sealed go for it. Problem is I have seen far too many hazy and ugly toned proof sets that required a dip. If they are hazy or ungly toned then 10% back isn't enough for me to have to deal with it. >>



    This is my response too
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,773 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd go for it a heart beat if the coins are nice. About half of the 1954 sets were packaged in cloudy plastic sleeves that often caused the silver coins to acquire unattractive dark toning. This toning does not dip well. If one of those sets is part of the deal, it would make the purchase less attractive, but if the other sets are nice it’s still a good deal.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seems like allot of mixed opinions. Thanks for the replies. I am leaning against the purchase so far.
  • erickso1erickso1 Posts: 1,705 ✭✭✭
    Packaging look like this? (1954 for reference)

    image
  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Packaging look like this? (1954 for reference) >>



    Yes, the packaging looks just like that. image I have not made my final decision yet, but still thinking.





  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,773 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There 1954 sets that are housed in cellophane are almost always nicer coins.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,572 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I always like looking at these sets and picking up sets with unmessed with packaging and coins.

    The comments about 1954 coins stored in the soft poly bags developing dark toning that is difficult to remove is correct.

    I bought a 1954 proof set years ago at a Long Beach show that contains a half dollar that is likely a DCAM. The obverse is very nice. However about 40%-50% of the surface area of the reverse (from about 2:00 to 8:00 on the coin) covered with a light yellowish/tan haze. It did not come off with a simple dip. I understand that polybags impart adark toning that at times is purple/blue in color and that when it is removed with a dip the yellowish/tan haze remains. It is a bummer because my half is really a nice one. I have been tempted to send it to NGC to see if it can remove the haze, but I have my doubts. So I primarily just look at the obverse of the coin.

    I have another 1954 set that is in the OGP, with polybags. I took out the silver coins. All three of them have cameo contract and all three of them have dark crescent rim toning of purple/blue. Fairly attractive, but maybe not to everyone.



  • georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭
    The staple should show corrosion. If the staples are all shiny/new, that is a red flag.
  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,487 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Extreme humidity and temperature swings versus a dry, more even year round climate, knowing the kind of environment they resided in the last 60 years might help yield better coins.

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • i recently bought a 54 set that was in plastic like the one shown. the half has a lot of black "toning" that is not attractive, is there a way to "fix" it???? will acetone work??

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file