It is neat that you found an 1884-CC intact in the inner capsule of a "doily" holder, but unfortunately the outer frame is missing. This usually diminishes the collector interest for the style of holder. There actually is a way to remedy this, but that is a trade secret.
<< <i>It is neat that you found an 1884-CC intact in the inner capsule of a "doily" holder, but unfortunately the outer frame is missing. This usually diminishes the collector interest for the style of holder. There actually is a way to remedy this, but that is a trade secret. >>
Yeah, I knew it didn't have the outer ring when I picked it up, but I just thought it was cool to find another one a couple of days after the 1st.
Trade secret...hmm.. you have me thinking hard on how to do that. They seem attached, not just a snap on. Does anyone know what holders had similar outer rings?
Comments
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
<< <i>It is neat that you found an 1884-CC intact in the inner capsule of a "doily" holder, but unfortunately the outer frame is missing. This usually diminishes the collector interest for the style of holder. There actually is a way to remedy this, but that is a trade secret.
Yeah, I knew it didn't have the outer ring when I picked it up, but I just thought it was cool to find another one a couple of days after the 1st.
Trade secret...hmm.. you have me thinking hard on how to do that. They seem attached, not just a snap on.
Does anyone know what holders had similar outer rings?