Help : Determining grade of raw card !!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc06c/dc06c9b552e7faefd46a77d15f1292554fc7474c" alt="svtPONY95"
I will be listing this card on the board for a friend and need help grading this card accurately. Please chime in !!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/142c1/142c19e59578a51c365b69d71b699862745d35d7" alt="image"
<a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.collectorfocus.com/...tion/svtPONY95/pre-war">Pre war
0
Comments
Jeff
<< <i>Best a card can get with a wrinkle is EX 5 not vg/ex 4 as stated in earlier post. Nice card, good luck.
Jeff >>
This is true, but if you read the PSA guidelines, they don't even allow a wrinkle at EX 5, but sometimes they will give an EX 5 with a wrinkle (always been a mystery to me):
EX 5: Excellent
On PSA EX-5 cards, very minor rounding of the corners is becoming evident. Surface wear or printing defects are more visible. There may be minor chipping on edges. Loss of original gloss will be more apparent. Focus of picture may be slightly out-of-register. Several light scratches may be visible upon close inspection, but do not detract from the appeal of the card. Card may show some off-whiteness of borders. Centering must be 85/15 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the back.
VG-EX 4: Very Good-Excellent
A PSA VG-EX 4 card's corners may be slightly rounded. Surface wear is noticeable but modest. The card may have light scuffing or light scratches. Some original gloss will be retained. Borders may be slightly off-white. A light crease may be visible. Centering must be 85/15 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the back.
Ebay Store:
Probstein123
phone: 973 747 6304
email: rickprobstein1@gmail.com
Probstein123 is actively accepting CONSIGNMENTS !!
Jeff
"Molon Labe"
PSA HOF Baseball Postwar Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 80.51% Complete)
PSA Pro Football HOF Rookie Players Set Registry- (Currently 19.80% Complete)
PSA Basketball HOF Players Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 6.02% Complete)
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
<< <i>Tony...a wrinkle and a crease are not the same. A wrinkle affects only one side of a card while a crease goes through the card and is visible on both sides. The best a card with a crease can get is a 4.
Jeff >>
Agree with this completely. This is one of the areas that PSA really falls down in their resources section. They need to show more examples of what they mean by nebulous terms like wrinkles. Of course, that would be hard to show in a web image as they are generally only visible at an angle and really don't detract from the card enough (IMO) to warrant such a grade drop).
I say the card could get a 5.5, but more likely a 5
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
<a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.collectorfocus.com/...tion/svtPONY95/pre-war">Pre war
<< <i>
<< <i>Tony...a wrinkle and a crease are not the same. A wrinkle affects only one side of a card while a crease goes through the card and is visible on both sides. The best a card with a crease can get is a 4.
Jeff >>
Agree with this completely. This is one of the areas that PSA really falls down in their resources section. They need to show more examples of what they mean by nebulous terms like wrinkles. Of course, that would be hard to show in a web image as they are generally only visible at an angle and really don't detract from the card enough (IMO) to warrant such a grade drop).
I say the card could get a 5.5, but more likely a 5 >>
I just wanted to clarify what I originally said:
I know that PSA will give a card a 5 with a wrinkle, and I know that a wrinkle (I like to call it a hairline crease) is slightly different than an actual "crease." My gripe, like what bking said, is that PSA doesn't have this as a stated policy, it is kind of just something that people in "the know" know.
As an aside, when I give condition estimates on raw cards, to me a hairline crease or a crease knocks it below ex; I know this differs from PSA, but when I think of "ex," I expect the card to have no crease of any kind, hairline or not.
The whole issue of "crease" versus "hairline crease" versus "no crease at all" is a little fuzzy, I think there are a few different opinions out there. This is issue is probably deserving of its own thread.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Tony...a wrinkle and a crease are not the same. A wrinkle affects only one side of a card while a crease goes through the card and is visible on both sides. The best a card with a crease can get is a 4.
Jeff >>
Agree with this completely. This is one of the areas that PSA really falls down in their resources section. They need to show more examples of what they mean by nebulous terms like wrinkles. Of course, that would be hard to show in a web image as they are generally only visible at an angle and really don't detract from the card enough (IMO) to warrant such a grade drop).
I say the card could get a 5.5, but more likely a 5 >>
I just wanted to clarify what I originally said:
I know that PSA will give a card a 5 with a wrinkle, and I know that a wrinkle (I like to call it a hairline crease) is slightly different than an actual "crease." My gripe, like what bking said, is that PSA doesn't have this as a stated policy, it is kind of just something that people in "the know" know.
As an aside, when I give condition estimates on raw cards, to me a hairline crease or a crease knocks it below ex; I know this differs from PSA, but when I think of "ex," I expect the card to have no crease of any kind, hairline or not.
The whole issue of "crease" versus "hairline crease" versus "no crease at all" is a little fuzzy, I think there are a few different opinions out there. This is issue is probably deserving of its own thread. >>
I use the definition that I read somewhere a few years ago - a wrinkle is just an issue with the surface paper, whereas a crease affects the card stock itself.
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
Step 1, list it as an 8, and sell it to itzagoner.
Step 2, wait for him to open a claim on you and send the card back.
Step 3, list it as a 7, and sell it to itzagoner.
Step 4, wait for him to open a claim on you and send the card back.
Just repeat above steps, lowering the stated grade each time and when itzagoner doesnt file a claim, then you have the grade!
"Wrinkle" vs. Crease
<< <i>Here is an old thread about the difference between a "wrinkle" and a "crease," but it doesn't really discuss whether a "wrinkle" is a 4 or a 5.
"Wrinkle" vs. Crease >>
Looks like one of those topics that really should be in an FAQ somewhere, or at least a sticky thread.
For the record, I have a stack of PSA 5 slabs that have nothing keeping them out of an 8 holder except a single 1/4 inch wrinkle. So, I'd vote that a wrinkle means you get a auto 5 assuming everything else warrants a grade above 5.
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
and i'd never send you back.
you are exactly as you've been described.