Home U.S. Coin Forum

Washington quarter series toner question

Which dates are the hardest to find attractively toned?
I always see rainbow 57,58 quartersfrom mintset toning. Any other dates I should avoid??

Comments

  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,423 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Why would you "avoid" them?
    The dates that there were double mint sets are usually considered the most likely to have nicely toned examples, though I have noticed that the 1955 double mint sets don't usually produce as nice as the '57 '58 and the '56 is nice but not quite as nice as the '57 '58 sets, imho, on average.

    I have seen board members post some very nice ones from the '40s and other dates in the '50s. I am assuming you mean silver quarters and not the clad.

    I'm bumping the thread for you hoping that others that know the series better than I can help (I know manofcoins probably has some thoughts as well as some of the dealers/photographers who handle a lot of them (Airplanenut, MessyDesk, MrD, etc)

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • First off, you should not avoid any Washington Quarters that are toned either NT or AT in my
    opinion. Obviously you will find nicer toned coins that come from mint sets that where released
    from the mint in cardboard holders because of the paper used to cover them. Dates prior to 1947
    and after 1958 would again in my opinion are the harder dates to find toning because of the lack of paper
    with chemical content making direct contact to the surface of the coin. Is seems that these will have a more
    prevalence to cause " Attractive Natural Toning ". The other dates will have differnt types of coloration
    caused by the way the coin has been stored / kept over a period of years. As for AT coins is there a reason
    not to collect them? Even if they are toned by a different way they to can be attractive to the eye of a collector
    which I have many just because they are pretty. hehe You need to understand how to determine which is which
    only so that you pay a fair price for the coin. Good Luck my Young Jedi, use The Force and Follow It Well image

    image

  • SamByrdSamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    I have many 56,57,58 toners that I enjoy from lower ms grades to ms67. There bonus years in that they can be found very attractive often at modest cost.

    To respond to your question though, I have found 30's dates to be tough even in circulated conditions to obtain with attractive tone.image
  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,399 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The dates from 1947-1958 exclusive of 1950 will be the most often found with appreciable toning within the 1932-1964 silver issues due to the sales of original government double mint sets that were produced using high sulfur cardboard backing and paper covers. Dates within this 1947-1958 range can have characteristic colors or "looks" likely again due to the batch of paper or cardboard used in the respective years. Overall, 1957 and 1958 WQ from Denver tend to tone the most dramatically.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I avoid tarnished coins.... I think it is a phobia...image Cheers, RickO
  • SkyManSkyMan Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭✭✭
    IMO the toughest dates to find attractively toned are from the 1930's.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file