Every once in a while I get a surprise sent to me. What do you think? (grade posted)

MrD · October 20, 2011 9:08AM

Thr green going around the obverse is brighter than the image indicated. There is no way you can capture this one completely in an picture

Cam40 · October 20, 2011 9:20AM

64+

littlebear · October 20, 2011 9:21AM

Awesome piece!

Larry L.

SUMORADA · October 20, 2011 9:25AM

65+..........pretty!

relicsncoins · October 20, 2011 9:25AM

Pretty. Sometimes dual sided toners like this are not looked upon as NT by the TPG's. If they didn't 91 it, I will go with MS64.

TomB · October 20, 2011 9:30AM

66

Flatwoods · October 20, 2011 9:32AM

65
The coin looks familiar to me but I'm not sure why.

LanceNewmanOCC · October 20, 2011 9:38AM

.
.
holy $#@#
.
.

BigE · October 20, 2011 9:47AM

67-----BigE

messydesk · October 20, 2011 9:49AM

64

rainbowroosie · October 20, 2011 10:06AM

I very rarely disagree with Tom B and I love ya Mr D, but "genuine." Everyone can hammer me for this...

drwstr123 · October 20, 2011 10:08AM

Very, very nice.
Pre-91.

Kove · October 20, 2011 11:30AM

100% acceptable toning.

MS 66+, and I wouldn't have a problem with 67 on that one.

agentjim007 · October 20, 2011 11:33AM

I grade it expensive.

seanq · October 20, 2011 11:41AM

I agree with whomever said 64+, the colors are outstanding but they are also hiding a lot of contact marks.

Sean Reynolds

areyouanywhere · October 20, 2011 11:41AM

MS64

TPRC · October 20, 2011 11:48AM

<< <i>64+

>>

golden · October 20, 2011 12:34PM

Does it have full lips?

Bear · October 20, 2011 12:39PM

MS 64 + color looks OK.

uofa1285 · October 20, 2011 12:42PM

Commem crap...Lol...beauty though!

melvin289 · October 20, 2011 1:03PM

Due to a few hits I'll give it a 65. Beautiful coin though.

Ron

RYK · October 20, 2011 1:09PM

<< <i>65
The coin looks familiar to me but I'm not sure why. >>

Same here!

pontiacinf · October 20, 2011 1:21PM

nice, I think ive seen it before.

Pokermandude · October 20, 2011 3:55PM

I'd grade it a technical 64/64+. But it's probably in a 65, maybe even 66, holder.

jhdfla · October 20, 2011 5:29PM

65+

shish · October 20, 2011 7:14PM

65+ The only difficult question for me would be; How much does the color increase the price?

ColonialCoinUnion · October 20, 2011 7:21PM

If graded several years ago, 64 or 65, if graded recently, Genuine.

PerryHall · October 20, 2011 7:40PM

<< <i>If graded several years ago, 64 or 65, if graded recently, Genuine. >>

Do you think the graders would be suspicious of the toning? Personally, I'm always suspicious of coins with fancy color like this. Also, while the colors are quite pretty, they distract from actually looking at the coin's design under all that color.

ricko · October 20, 2011 9:47PM

OK.. I will be the unpopular one (not just because I am not a fan of tarnish), however, I would say that coin has been AT'd. Experiments have produced virtually identical colors... That being said, if the owner is happy with it, then that is all that matters. Cheers, RickO

MrD · October 20, 2011 9:56PM

Grade posted

georgiacop50 · October 20, 2011 9:58PM

Looks a bit similar to Commems that were amazingly colored that surfaced in late 80's-early 90's. Many of those were holdered, then later the TPG's decided against them being MA and you would see them in bodybags with the ART TONING label.

I think it is AT.