Question regarding this '82 Ryan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82540/82540bd5d6b9a033c09398de84b559e8a8c39015" alt="Nikklos"
Hi all:
I am preparing my first submission to PSA and had a question. Please look at the back of this card:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec5cd/ec5cdc52dd7a352631fe1c03d0c28c68d9366f26" alt="image"
There is a line that appears to be a pen mark - but it is definitely not. I thought I may have a 10 before I saw that.
So my question is: Would this have otherwise been a 10? I would feel a lot better if it wouldn't have been a 10 in any case!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/151c6/151c66f574826a970765314227372ab7b71a3937" alt="image"
I am using this first submission as a dry run - not bringing out my A-Game items. Thanks!
I am preparing my first submission to PSA and had a question. Please look at the back of this card:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec5cd/ec5cdc52dd7a352631fe1c03d0c28c68d9366f26" alt="image"
There is a line that appears to be a pen mark - but it is definitely not. I thought I may have a 10 before I saw that.
So my question is: Would this have otherwise been a 10? I would feel a lot better if it wouldn't have been a 10 in any case!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/151c6/151c66f574826a970765314227372ab7b71a3937" alt="image"
I am using this first submission as a dry run - not bringing out my A-Game items. Thanks!
Nikklos
0
Comments
Kiss me twice.....let's party.
<< <i>That's a PSA 6. >>
I agree 6/7ish
unless this apparent flaw is scanner induced, you may be looking at no better than a 7.
you could purchase a PSA 9 inexpensively. save your money unless you want the card holdered for the enjoyment of doing it on your own. nothing wrong with that either.
I am still learning at grading and am far from an expert. When I first started I would make my own list of what I thought the cards would grade at. Then I would compare once they came back.
For a 10 in that card those corners must be sharp, they do look like they may have slight tip bumps to them.
Either way have fun, hope you get some great results. You should post some more scans of other cards you are considering grading.
The other thing is what you are wanting to gain by getting them graded. Are they for you PC or to sell and make money?
"Live everyday, don't throw it away"
It's funny. I want get 10s so I can sell them and make a lot of money. But if I get 10s, I don't think I'll want to sell them ever!
----------------------
Working on:
Football
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)
Baseball
1938 Goudey (56.25%)
1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
<< <i>That's a PSA 6. >>
Agreed, bottom two corners are not sharp by any means.
collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
<< <i>looks like a BCCG 10 >>