Options
Is this Jersey Colonial real? Better pics up
Better pics up - not great but better
I dont know much of anything about colonials. I looked in the redbook and it does not match any of the varieties. Thanks

I dont know much of anything about colonials. I looked in the redbook and it does not match any of the varieties. Thanks

0
Comments
,
i am not strong on colonials, but that date looks awfully simple to me
usually the number are quite eccentric, flared etc
.
.
any comments welcome!
.
.
<< <i>,
,
i am not strong on colonials, but that date looks awfully simple to me
usually the number are quite eccentric, flared etc >>
This is a known die variety with unremarkable date numerals similar to those on many other colonials across all series.
Don’t get too excited until an expert in this area, which I am not, has confirmed it.
<< <i>If I attributed this correctly, this is a rare one. From what I can determine it is a Maris 48-X, W-5265. It is rated as a URS-4 on Dave Bower�s Universal Rarity Scale, 5 to 8 known. Auction records cited were a �VF, rough and granular, $9,200� in the John Ford sale and Lorenzo Collection (Stacks 1/2008), VF-20, $43,125.
Don�t get too excited until an expert in this area, which I am not, has confirmed it. >>
It's a 48-g, which is a rarity-1 and among the most common New Jerseys.
<< <i>
<< <i>If I attributed this correctly, this is a rare one. From what I can determine it is a Maris 48-X, W-5265. It is rated as a URS-4 on Dave Bower�s Universal Rarity Scale, 5 to 8 known. Auction records cited were a �VF, rough and granular, $9,200� in the John Ford sale and Lorenzo Collection (Stacks 1/2008), VF-20, $43,125.
Don�t get too excited until an expert in this area, which I am not, has confirmed it. >>
It's a 48-g, which is a rarity-1 and among the most common New Jerseys. >>
I stand corrected I look at the G, matched and then ended up with the X.