Liberty Walking - wear vs. weak strike

Are Liberty Walking half dollars subject to weak strike? I just received a 1943 MS66 and in a PCGS slab. I notice the hand holding the flowers is not as well defined as I would have expected. Is this a typical problem area for this coin? I have 2 others that have been circulated that show definite wear and loss of definition between the hand and stems of the flowers. I don't think the MS66 is showing wear - reverse has all the detail I would expect. Also, is weak strike taken into consideration when grading at PCGS?
thanks
Jeff
thanks
Jeff
Liberty . . . In God We Trust . . . not just words - A way of life
0
Comments
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Believe it or not a goodly number of the 1941 and 1942 Proof Walkers were not well struck iether.
<< <i>That coin looks like it was a die spacing trial piece, performed while setting up a die - not just a weak strike. >>
It does look that way, but given the huge numbers of 'S' mint halves from the 1940's that look that way, they can't
all be die adjustment pieces.
<< <i>Huge numbers that look like this?! I've been studying the series for nearly 30 years, and I have seen more than my share of poorly struck walkers, but I can't recall ever seeing an AU or MS coin from any year or any mint with an obverse that looked anything close to this, with even the breast obliterated.
The unique look of this coin and the coolness factor is the reason why I submitted it to PCGS.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.