1910 Liberty Nickel

cameron12x · June 4, 2011 10:10AM

Thoughts about the grade?

Thoughts on toning?

Unknown · June 4, 2011 10:12AM

This content has been removed.

bidask · June 4, 2011 10:14AM

proof 63 wild guess

Rampage · June 4, 2011 10:16AM

Pretty.

cameron12x · June 4, 2011 10:37AM

<< <i>proof 63 wild guess >>

Hint: It's not proof.

Redglobe · June 4, 2011 10:41AM

Hello,

A real nice AU-58

Rob

speety · June 4, 2011 10:42AM

I can't really tell which are on the coin and which are on the holder, but my initial thought was a fairly nice AU-58. I've seen my fair share of coins like yours in MS-63 or MS-64 holders but will stick to my high AU guess.

Obiwancanoli · June 4, 2011 10:42AM

Sure would like to have this one in hand to do it proper... but it appears to be 65+... I see only 1-2 hits on either side, surface appears natural, and toning? Not sure about that, but I'm speaking for my skills here, not my doubts...

I like it.

howards · June 4, 2011 10:50AM

58. Looks like rub in the hair, not a weak strike. Of course, there are lots of 58's in 62 holders these days.

cameron12x · June 4, 2011 10:52AM

<< <i>58. Looks like rub in the hair, not a weak strike. Of course, there are lots of 58's in 62 holders these days. >>

I thought possibly the same, also.

Would there be telltale rub elsewhere, too?

pursuitofliberty · June 4, 2011 10:52AM

Jeff, I don't like the picture much (hard to read), but the coin looks solid ... and nice!

I would say it's either in a 58 holder (appears to have slight rub), or if Unc, is probably a 63.

Again, the picture probably does this coin no justice ... but it's enough to tell it's a pretty nice Nickel. 1910 is a good year too for the late dates.

keyman64 · June 4, 2011 10:57AM

Only missing one fully struck star...some wear on the hair or just not fully struck...it is hard to tell without it being in hand but from the pics it looks like there is a little wear on the hair so I am going to guess AU. The reverse looks great besides the scratch on the V. AU58?