Home U.S. Coin Forum

1885 Type 3 Gold Dollar opinions

tydyetydye Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
Is she legit? Weight is correct. Edited to add - be right back with some larger pics
image
image
image
image

Comments

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,897 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The rim is missing and rough in some areas---the denticles go off the edge of the coin. I would say it's fake unless the pics aren't a fair representation of the coin.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,897 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Also, change your thread title from 1855 to 1885.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • tydyetydye Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
    Thanks - corrected date.
    Yes denticles was what concerned me as well. Ex-Jewelry?
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    FIrst, I am anything but an expert....

    Disclaimers aside, the obverse crumbling doesn't bother me much -- I seem to recall seeing other type 3s like that. The reverse rim (from 8 to 11 o'clock), or lack thereof, would have me concerned with authenticity.

    By way of example, here is a picture of a raw Type 3 (the same coin as my avatar at right, now in a PCGS MS 65 slab):

    image
    image
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • I'm pretty sure it's fake.
  • Oy vey!
  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,952 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hmmmm the small photos have right color for counterfeit gold, the larger photos show it flat and lifeless. BUT, the one clear indicator of genuine is there, thats a weak IC in america, on the obverse. Ill look through my books in a little while and see if any depressions match those shown in the photos in fivaz or lonesome john.


    overall though it looks fake (from across the room)


    how is the reeding? It should be thin and very delicate, and rounded looking both to the eye and to the touch.


    The breakdown (granularity) in the dentils is normal for these, It can happen anywhere on the coin so that alone means nothing. I dont see any spikes though, that points genuine also.

    again.....tough to say from photos
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,814 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Can't tell from those photos, but my gut feeling is NG.
    TD
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • tydyetydye Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
    Thanks for the help. This is the best I can do with the photo's - small coin. Color is more like in the smaller pics. I will tell the owner just to scrap it then.

    That is a really nice one there Mike.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The dentiles on the right side of the obverse are very funky. Sadly I have to vote "counterfeit."

    Odd dentiles are not unusual for genuine gold dollars of this era, especially on the reverse, but they don't look like THOSE dentiles.

    The frosty outside and less frosty inside looks funky too.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file