WAY TO STEP UP PSA

soo, i had a 120 card sub with 20, thats right 20 mechanical errors. i called psa on this, they are the proeffsional grading company right? so i sent the back, its cost me $21.50 with insurance to ship back and then it takes 21 days to fix the errors they made. so i get no refund. had to call again and i get a voucher for 30.00. wow what a slap in the face. i get 8.50 profit, good enough for the card to get graded. just gotta say what poor service. anybody had any thing like this?
# 2 Pete Rose Master Set , also
collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
0
Comments
collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
it's something the managers take seriously and look into...
what I think is more important - is HOW they handle the problem.
in this case I've inferred you're not totally happy with how they handled it.
I would recommend you send a comprehensive email to the "boss" and detail the whole experience.
All customers should have an equal positive experience - but someone who sends in 120 cards "has" to be satisfied...
they can't afford to have "those" kind of submitters dry up on them IMO.
<< <i>soo, i had a 120 card sub with 20, thats right 20 mechanical errors. i called psa on this, they are the proeffsional grading company right? so i sent the back, its cost me $21.50 with insurance to ship back and then it takes 21 days to fix the errors they made. so i get no refund. had to call again and i get a voucher for 30.00. wow what a slap in the face. i get 8.50 profit, good enough for the card to get graded. just gotta say what poor service. anybody had any thing like this? >>
Yes I get a mechanical error every other submission it seems lately. The last one really kind of annoyed me. They were going to send the error back unfixed and I was lucky and noticed it before they shipped it back. I called and they did fix it but if I hadn't called they would have sent the mechanical error back unfixed. The card was a 2009 Goudey Mini green back and the label was just 2009 Goudey w/o the mini green back variation.
Another complaint I have is 20-30% of my little ol' 50 card submissions all had slabs that had minor cracks on the edge(s)/corner(s) or scratches on the front or back of the slabs. I don't know if they know this or not but some people out there just refuse to purchase a slab that has scratches on it or a partial cracked edge or corner. Slabs that don't have these blemishes generate more money. This is from what I have seen since I started submitting stuff.
<< <i>I would recommend you send a comprehensive email to the "boss" and detail the whole experience >>
Speaking of which, does anyone have the email for JO? There was an issue on my last order that I wanted to ask him about.
~WalterSobchak
<< <i>I don't get it, Cory. You paid $21.50 to ship, and got a $30 voucher back for your trouble? That doesn't seem on the face of it like a terrible deal. >>
That how I saw it too. The only way it doesn't work is if it's your last submission ever.
they will make it right...
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
relevent portions of a letter I sent to Mr. Orlando.
I received a reply to my letter from the Set Registry Asst. Manager, Ms. Robbins via telephone.
She was very friendly and professional but since it was a grading problem her understanding
of how this occured was limited. Apparently the graders don't use the submission form at all.
It is only after the cards are graded that someone enters them into the database. They should
refer to the submission form but if they are rushing or think they know the card it is possible
they don't check it or don't check it very closely.
They did send me a voucher for $50. It is still sitting here on my desk along with the voucher
for the cards they didn't grade. My membership expired a couple of months ago. I am still
debating whether or not to renew it.
Stephen
Mr. Orlando,
I know you must be very busy and I am not sure I should be contacting you but I have been
extremely frustrated with my last submission ( #4813333 ) for a variety of reasons. If this an
inappropriate forum to express my concerns I apologize.
On Sept 27th I sent in 212 baseball cards for grading at the monthly special level. They were
logged in on Sept 29th.... Now I waited. Finally on Dec 6th I called PSA Customer Service to
inquire about my order status. They told me it was Day 46 and my order should be completed
soon. It finally shipped Dec 16th and I received it on Dec 20th. I know my order wasn’t a high
priority and PSA can get very busy but this was by far the longest time I have ever waited for
an order. If this long of a wait was to insure my order was accurate it would have been worth it.
Unfortunately this was just the start of my frustrations. I am returning 37 items to PSA
( Sub #697701 ) because of “mechanical errors”. I received 30 of these errors with my last
submission. I am sure that many of the complaints you receive are due to a difference of opinion
concerning the grade an item receives. I have been guilty of this myself but I do realize that
small defects can be easily overlooked. While PSA takes great effort to make grading standards
objective when people are involved there can’t help but be some subjective opinions inherent in
the process, especially in the higher grades where the defects can be extremely small.
However there is nothing subjective when it comes to the card label. The card label either
correctly identifies the card or is does not. I am not claiming to be perfect. I have mis-
identified a couple of cards I’ve submitted in the past and I am sure other members have as
well and I am grateful when the grader corrects my error. However what I do not understand
is how a grader can change a correctly named and submitted card to an incorrect one?
What type of quality control is in place to minimize these problems? Do the graders look at
the submission form to see if the name they assign the card matches the form? If the name
of the card is different from that listed by the submitter shouldn’t there be some reason and/or
documentation? Wouldn’t it be more cost effective to take the time to get it right initially
rather than having to fix these errors later?
Of course I am not privy to the internal workings at PSA. I have no idea whether it would be
practical or not but couldn’t the card name from the submitter be entered into the computer
when initially received. Any changes afterward by PSA should then need to be justified.
I love the service your company provides but when you submit 212 Ken Griffey Jr. cards and 30
come back incorrectly labeled and 13 others are not graded at all after waiting almost 3 months a
person can’t help but wonder what else may be inaccurate with the remaining 169 cards?...
Thank you for your time and consideration...
Deadman's Registry Sets
Edited to add: Ahh, two separate orders, the confusion. I feel like it's Friday, I got tickets to Vegas and my supervisor just dropped a 200 card Griffey order in front of me.
I have no idea who you are, but please don't leave. You're a valuable asset to the hobby.
Sevendust.
<< <i>I got a card back once that had a hair in the slab. What does that mean?
i've reholdered a couple which had an eyelash inside. no lie.
this tells me that the graders are definitely giving my cards a very thorough close-up inspection, but i'm equally as relieved that they don't need to listen to, smell or taste them.
<< <i>
<< <i>I got a card back once that had a hair in the slab. What does that mean?
i've reholdered a couple which had an eyelash inside. no lie.
this tells me that the graders are definitely giving my cards a very thorough close-up inspection, but i'm equally as relieved that they don't need to listen to, smell or taste them. >>
The hair I got back was an eyelash as well! I should have just sent it in for a reholder but I didn't. I cracked the case and just sent in again. Got the same grade and card back but minus the hair.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I got a card back once that had a hair in the slab. What does that mean?
i've reholdered a couple which had an eyelash inside. no lie.
this tells me that the graders are definitely giving my cards a very thorough close-up inspection, but i'm equally as relieved that they don't need to listen to, smell or taste them. >>
The hair I got back was an eyelash as well! I should have just sent it in for a reholder but I didn't. I cracked the case and just sent in again. Got the same grade and card back but minus the hair. >>
maybe our guy was a little bit too aggressive with the Propecia and happened to be shedding.
<< <i>I got a card back once that had a hair in the slab. What does that mean?
It means that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas must have slabbed the card.
...edited to say, I just received 3 mech errors (labels on the wrong holder) from a recent 100 card submission.
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
<< <i>
<< <i>I got a card back once that had a hair in the slab. What does that mean?
It means that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas must have slabbed the card. >>
Now that is FUNNY!! Good one!