Do you think this one will go MS67+?

Type2

I looked at alot of rolls got bernt out now I'am geting back in the rolls. I was 1 1/2 boxs in when I saw this one I found some MS67FS but I want a MS-67+ or 8 do you think it will go? Thank in advance, Type2.

tightbudget

I think it might make 67 but I'm not sure about a + seeing how there are a few too many marks on the reverse for it to be a nice 67.

TexasNationals

I don't think it will even go 67 let alone a plus, but what do I know. Good luck.

Type2

I guess I need to sharpen the old eye a bit more.

Bear

MS-66 is the best you can hope for.

Manorcourtman

I'd say 66 but the chatter below Monticello and Five cents may keep it at 65. Nice obverse though....

ricko

No.. 66 at best .... too many chatter/marks.... Cheers, RickO

georgiacop50

I think 67 is in the realm, but a Plus? HO HO HO!

lcoopie

I am guessing 65s

I think you need to set your white balance as they have a yellow cast (discoloration)
unless that is their color

JRocco

I don't think so either.
Nice coin though.

ModCrewman

Don't like it for a + with the action below the F of FIVE. Very nice looking difficult coin though.

llafoe

You might get a 67FE (full eyebrows).

Priest

Nice coin, maybe a 67, I really think what the roughness or if you care to call it nics on the rim may affect the grader's final decision. But it should get a FE, ha, ha, what may IIafoe be starting. (see earlier post)

leothelyon

You do know that better examples are in mint sets.

Leo

ambro51

impossible to tell from off color balance not too good images but it seems that there are a lot of small tics and chatter on the coin and I dont see it going over 65. In view of how difficult modern coin grading is....id not be surprised at 64.


(Ive been down this road and is is not fun)

but good luck and PLEASE if you do submit this repost so we may form some type of idea how tough pcgs is on a modern circ. coin.

mingot

<< <i>You do know that better examples are in mint sets.

Leo >>



I consider the mint set coins different, as they had the satin finish. I think you need both for a complete set.

EDIT: and if I get some time, I will post a few pictures of 2010 67s.

leothelyon

<< <i>

<< <i>You do know that better examples are in mint sets.

Leo >>



I consider the mint set coins different, as they had the satin finish. I think you need both for a complete set.

EDIT: and if I get some time, I will post a few pictures of 2010 67s. >>



That won't be necessary.


Leo

Type2

I think what Leo is saying is that this coin or batch of coins may have been struck by the same die as a satin finish coin but if so would that make it a error?

BigRick

Obv Yes. Rev no.