Options
Bust Quaters vs Bust Halfs
Frozenink
Posts: 446 ✭✭
What do you all think the reasoning is for not seeing bust quarters that have great color or that "original" look that everyone is after in the bust halves. I have seen many that are original with wear and the grey/black look but very few if any that look like the monster halves.
Is this because the quarters actually circulated more that the halves? I recall an article stating in the 1860's out west, the lowest denomination to circulate was the quater, so I guess it saw more use. The halfs sat in bank bags for the most part.
Do I have the correct line of thinking? or am I missing something?
Gary
Is this because the quarters actually circulated more that the halves? I recall an article stating in the 1860's out west, the lowest denomination to circulate was the quater, so I guess it saw more use. The halfs sat in bank bags for the most part.
Do I have the correct line of thinking? or am I missing something?
Gary
0
Comments
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
The second factor is mintage. For years, some collectors argued that the Classic Head large cents were rare in high grade (e.g. EF or better) because the copper from which they were made was “soft.” The real answer was in the mintages. The mintage for the Draped Bust type large cent (1796 – 1807) was 16.1 million. The mintage for the Classic Head large cent (1808 – 1814) was 4.8 million.
The same applies to the Bust Quarter vs. the Bust Half Dollar. From 1807 to 1836 the mint issued 82.3 million Bust Half dollars. During the corresponding period, 1815 to 1838 it issued 6 million Bust and Reduced Size Quarters.