Thoughts on this Wreath cent NEW PICS ADDED!

Ive had this in my collection for a few years, and have been thinking about upgrading to a problem free VF. This has nice color, just lots of planchet issues, primarily through the date. The color is quite nice, and because of the planchet flaws it was very affordable. There is no major corrosion, and the pitting on the reverse are planchet flaws.
Would you keep this one or upgrade it? Its currently in a non-top tier holder with Fine 15 details listed. PCGS would genuine it due to the planchet issues.
Sellers images below. Lots of slab glare. Will take in hand pics later this week when the snow melts and I can get to the bank!

Here are my images. The coin is an even brown, not as much reds in hand.

Would you keep this one or upgrade it? Its currently in a non-top tier holder with Fine 15 details listed. PCGS would genuine it due to the planchet issues.
Sellers images below. Lots of slab glare. Will take in hand pics later this week when the snow melts and I can get to the bank!

Here are my images. The coin is an even brown, not as much reds in hand.


All coins kept in bank vaults.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
0
Comments
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
A decade ago a Chain Cent that looked like that Wreath cent with cleaning other things going on would be a hard sell at $2,000. Wreath cents, which are more common, would be lucky get $1,000.
The missing date is problem for that piece despite the fact that it speaks for itself.
I once had a very nice 1839 N1 overdate with a small planchet flaw directly below the date and it proved to be such a distraction that I sold
the coin...but one man's distraction is another man's beauty-mark.
In reviewing the die state information in Sheldon and Breen, I can't find any mention of a massive die failure over the date area. As such this is either an unknown terminal die state or some sort of damage. The date area appears to be raised, not into planchet which would indicate that it’s no a lamination. Laminations are common on the S-11 cents, and it could also apply the S-10 coins as well.
1793 Wreath
AJ
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
I must agree with many of the others... that having a date on the coin would be a lot better...
If you can afford it, I'd upgrade it... BUT would be selective & take your time... you already have
one... many ppl would love to be in your position or would like to have this coin. (even without a date)
These type of coins are very difficult to get... regardless of grade. Look at the 1794 Starred Reverse coins...
They are bringing HUGE money. There is one up for auction by Heritage now at upcoming FUN show. Which
is rare. Many feel it will bring over $20,000+ (even with the planchet flaws!!)
so keep searching for the coin you like... best of luck.
koda
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
You are correct... that is what happened to my 1794 Starred Rev Cent...
It is marked as Genuine 98
shasta7
I thought it had been worked on as well.
Given the verdigris in the lower hair - Do you think it may have been heated to disguise heavier corrosion in the area of the date? The curl below the right leaf seems quite odd and the flow of the raised metal given the smoothness on
Ankur - my opinion is to replace, color is almost too good given the other issues. in any case an interesting piece.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!