The cheapest form of gambling.

If you can get a box of 88 Topps for say, 5 bucks a box, how do you not buy it & see if you get a PSA 10 or two?
Ron Burgundy
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
0
Comments
<< <i>With 1988 Topps, the gamble isn't in the box rip, it's in the cost of the sub. If you get a 10, you get triple your money. If you get a 9, you have a $0.25 card. Getting a 10 in 1988 Topps isn't a gimme. >>
That's exactly what I was thinking. I don't know the set well enough, but do the rookies and bigger stars(Glavine,Ryan,etc)...sell for that much even in Gem 10?
think husky women in oversized sundresses holding plastic buckets under both arms and dumping nickels into an entire bank of slot machines.
<< <i>think husky women in oversized sundresses holding plastic buckets under both arms and dumping nickels into an entire bank of slot machines.
You had me at husky women!
My Sandberg topps basic set
My Sandberg Topps Master set
1989 Topps however might be more 10 friendly due to less of a border. Plus I know someone who is wanting a 10 Saberhagen.
Clear Skies,
Mark
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
1) The threat of re-awakening the psychological trauma stemming from the 100's of hours spent organizing 3200ct boxes of 88 topps, all the while planning retirement.
2) The design is awful. I haven't been paying attention to new baseball, but I would bet there isn't an 88 topps themed heritage set.
3) The player selection is as awful today as it was in 1988. What did it have back in '88. Walt Weiss? No. Gregg Jefferies? No. What does it have today? Roberto Alomar? No. Heck, even OPC had Delino DeShields in its '88 product.
4) Because throwing out baseball cards feels wrong, and you'd have to be a pretty heartless person to give away this garbage.
5) Because speculating on condition rarities for '88 topps sounds as hilarious as it actually is. Do you really want to be the guy that sells '88 topps PSA graded low pop cards? Talk about taking advantage of the mentally challenged.
I could go on...
-FC
lol
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
Very unBurgundy-like to roll with 80's stuff but I was just in a mood today....
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
Just think of junk wax like going to the movies. Hey, it may be a crap movie, but it is more about the experience than the investment.
I bought these and felt so guilty I actually offered the seller more $. He declined, saying he just wanted to clear up space.
I went through one of them and found a Mattingly and couple others in likely PSA 10. It's a very boring rip, though, and I don't know when I'll get to the other four.
T222's PSA 1 or better
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
That is the best post I have ever read on this board!!!
I threw out some 1989 Topps cards the other day becuase I needed the box they came in. The major league debut set commons. It felt wrong!
I agree with everything you said!
If you sub any you have to 100% believe they are a 10.
Have fun either way.
I actually like the design, and who can forget the HOT Sam Horn !!!
You know, I almost bought a Keith Comstock white letters error card on the B/S/T last month purely because I'd never seen one in my youth. I guess my 12 year old mind had never quite accepted that there was supply beyond the card section of my local Rich's department store.
And as a non sequitor, in all of my rack, jumbo, and cello pack cherry picking of my youth, I didn't ever see the type of absolutely ridiculous star showing packs that I've seen on this board. McGwire on the front and back of a cello? Montana rookie on the front and back of a cello? This is too much for my teenage memories. I was happy with an Ellis Burks or a Mattingly showing through the front of a score pack.
The only way to get a real star showing '88 topps card was by buying the 8 1/2 x 11 folders. Even then, I could never find a Canseco. It's okay, my favorite player was Galarraga and there were always about 20 of them left over 'cause no one else cared about the Big Cat.
Now I want those three boxes, Ron. Oh wait, I'll go to eBay and get a case for the same price.
-FC
<< <i>how do you not buy it?
1) The threat of re-awakening the psychological trauma stemming from the 100's of hours spent organizing 3200ct boxes of 88 topps, all the while planning retirement.
2) The design is awful. I haven't been paying attention to new baseball, but I would bet there isn't an 88 topps themed heritage set.
3) The player selection is as awful today as it was in 1988. What did it have back in '88. Walt Weiss? No. Gregg Jefferies? No. What does it have today? Roberto Alomar? No. Heck, even OPC had Delino DeShields in its '88 product.
4) Because throwing out baseball cards feels wrong, and you'd have to be a pretty heartless person to give away this garbage.
5) Because speculating on condition rarities for '88 topps sounds as hilarious as it actually is. Do you really want to be the guy that sells '88 topps PSA graded low pop cards? Talk about taking advantage of the mentally challenged.
I could go on...
-FC >>
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
<< <i>Again, which of these has the most chance for a possibly decent pull: 88 Donruss, 88,89 or 90 Fleer, 88,89,90 or 91 Topps? >>
88 Donruss has the Glavine, which is actually pretty tough to find in a psa 10 and sells well. Looking at that design might cause a seizure though. The 1989 fleer would depend on what kind of Billy Ripken is possible and probably has more rookies and variations than any of the other boxes. The 1991 topps Chipper Jones is a nice card and sells OK in a psa 10.
Probably the best chance of pulls would be the 1989 Fleer (Griffey, Johnson, Ripken Error, variations on Ripken, Johnson and a few others)
T222's PSA 1 or better
I'd say '89 Fleer
Well it isn't smoking. At a convenience store two days ago, someone in front of me bought a pack if cigaretts at $6.89 for the pack! Thats a lot of money for a high risk gamble. Glad I never started smoking.
Oh wait a minute, you meant the other form of packs...............
email bcmiller7@comcast.net
Bosox1976
Got this little strumpet too...
Bosox1976
<< <i>
<< <i>how do you not buy it?
1) The threat of re-awakening the psychological trauma stemming from the 100's of hours spent organizing 3200ct boxes of 88 topps, all the while planning retirement.
2) The design is awful. I haven't been paying attention to new baseball, but I would bet there isn't an 88 topps themed heritage set.
3) The player selection is as awful today as it was in 1988. What did it have back in '88. Walt Weiss? No. Gregg Jefferies? No. What does it have today? Roberto Alomar? No. Heck, even OPC had Delino DeShields in its '88 product.
4) Because throwing out baseball cards feels wrong, and you'd have to be a pretty heartless person to give away this garbage.
5) Because speculating on condition rarities for '88 topps sounds as hilarious as it actually is. Do you really want to be the guy that sells '88 topps PSA graded low pop cards? Talk about taking advantage of the mentally challenged.
I could go on...
-FC >>
Agreed, especially #2 and #4!
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
Merry Christmas!
<< <i>Again, which of these has the most chance for a possibly decent pull: 88 Donruss, 88,89 or 90 Fleer, 88,89,90 or 91 Topps? >>
I'd also do the 89 F
The Griffey is the best card possible from the lot
Smoltz and Biggio aren't bad cards, either, and you could find an FF error or corrected variation
Why not open all 4?
<< <i>I will buy some of the 80's and 90's crap as soon as I can unload the 80's and 90's crap I have. >>
pm sent.......
<< <i>There might be some money to be made if you're willing to take the time..... but after all the money I flushed down the john on cards from the '87-93 era, the thought of purchasing any more makes me throw up in my mouth a little. >>
That's the dillema. It's likely throwing good money after bad.
I do have a box of 88 Topps lying around that I've been getting annoyed with trying to find a spot to stack it. Maybe I'll break it down and see if there's anything submittable. I know it's unsearched since I bought it from Price Club in 1988.
I still have 3,000-6,000 loose cards from 1987 and 1988.
Serious question: What would be the best finds/toughest cards from those two years? Maybe I will look over the holiday break and post up what I have.
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
Or you can just tell us how many Luis Polonia cards you got.
<< <i>Oh yeah, no doubt there's a downside. But I was just in a shop today & offered $15 for 3 boxes. I figure the $15 is worth it just for the fun of busting them. And I'll wind up giving most of them back to the shop owner so he can give em away to the kiddos.
Very unBurgundy-like to roll with 80's stuff but I was just in a mood today.... >>
What kiddo wouldnt want a 1988 Matt Nokes rookie???
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
Or Regional Canadian Baseball Issues?
Come be a contributor to the OPC Baseball Wiki. It's free and easy!
OPeeChee.Wikispaces.Com