Home U.S. Coin Forum

RE: the recent "Conservation Coin of the Month" thread-----here's my example.

keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
A few days ago there was a thread with before/after pictures concerning an NCS copper coin which had some verdigris removed. I thought I'd pose a picture of a coin I own and ask what everyone thinks regarding the pro/con about conserving copper. The only detraction on the coin is the obverse carbon spot behing Lincoln's head. There are no other spots, no rub, no hairlines and no apparent die polish, my assumption being that it's a very early strike off fresh dies and was handled well through the years. The spot was there when I purchased the coin raw about three years ago and doesn't seem to have changed in appearance or size(but I still think it isn't safe or a good thing). The pictures were taken with the Cent in a Kointain which accounts for the dust a glare, it is really very clean with nice contrast and natural red color.

I would grade it as PR67 Cameo, though PCGS/NGC may grade it lower or not at all. Is this a coin you would consider conserving?? Is this a coin you would have passed on due to the "spot" while assuming it is damaged?? Please give some feedback with your reply if possible. Thanks.

Al H.


image

Comments


  • Killer Lincoln.....image a closeup of the Obv. spot on my screen ...makes it look "active" in hand it may not be..If it were me I would not send it, if anything it just needs to be neutrilized with acetone, if active, anything else IMO would ruin the coin....
  • CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,645 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How rare is it? If there are a lot of 67CAM 1953 Lincolns I say try to fix it.

    Naturally any conserved coin should be traded as such.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Have you examined the spot under high magnification (i.e. 200x)? May be worth it to understand exactly what that is. Cheers, RickO
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    You seem to like the coin, it looks great, although it is not in the right plastic (which, perhaps, makes the coin all wrong).

    Personally, I would not mess with it.
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I am going to say no, don't bother. While a 67 or higher Cam 53 proof would be worth the effort there are no guarantees it would grade after being conserved or grade as a CAM particularly at PCGS. Have you checked to verify it’s not a DDO?

    WS
    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • jmski52jmski52 Posts: 23,307 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If a better specimen had been available, I'd have held out for it. 57 years is a long time to expect a proof copper to go without reacting to its environment, and the fact that this coin suffered a spot elevates the ones that didn't.

    As for conserving it, I'd have to know more about the number of unblemished ones still extant and the cost differential between those and this one.
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • EagleEyeEagleEye Posts: 7,677 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Easy conservation method : Sell it an buy a better one.
    Rick Snow, Eagle Eye Rare Coins, Inc.Check out my new web site:

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file