Question for RAW card sellers?

I recently sold a raw card on Ebay. The buyer sent it off to PSA and PSA claimed the card was trimmed. Basically, do raw card sellers guarantee that PSA will grade the card or is that a given?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
was this a rare/expensive card? very curious
The bidders name was nuclint.
PS - I thought this was funny....I asked him if it had graded an 8 or 8.5, would he have paid me more money.....(he paid about high 5, low 6 money).....
He bought a card and did not receive what he bought -- SNADs are fairly common for cards that PSA deems fake (aka questionable authenticity) -- I assume the same for doctored cards.
The only way I would not refund is if I had legitimate reason to believe that he switched out the card.
Always plenty of PSA-graded cards in my ebay store -- https://ebay.com/str/thelumbercompanysportscards
would you just eat it and say no problem? Or would you ask the seller for a refund?
If it came back in a lower grade then it appeared or a higher one that means absolutely nothing IMO.
If it was me I'd refund him. Would it have been different if when he received it he himself thought it to be trimmed
and asked for a refund?
IMO at least this guy is trying to communicate. I have no idea if his SNAD window is still active or not.
Good sellers stand behind what they sell.
Steve
Could that be the case here?
send it back in again AND expect a seller to make a refund.
I must be missing something here but if this card was sharp and awesome looking
shouldn't it have been graded before selling it? I mean a 55 Bowman Mays graded
is worth much more than a raw example, no? Especially if it was possible it could come back as an 8.
Or what that a rhetorical question?
Steve
Was the card submitted by the seller and returned EOT?
Did the seller "know" or suspect that the card is/was trimmed?
Did the seller advertise the card as authentic and/or unaltered?
Such questions would determine the proper plan of action.
Personally, I would refund the buyer, but then again, I guarantee any raw cards that I sell as original, authentic and unaltered.
I will always guarantee that a card will grade with a number grade, or I will refund.
Have never had to refund for this reason yet. I think Im fairly good at spotting trimmed cards in the sets I collect and deal with, but modern is a whole different story.
PS. I sell mostly older stuff from 1880-1950 in VG condition on average
However, anything is possible.
The mailman, the person that received it at PSA and the grader could have trimmed it too.
Steve
To the OP did he send you the PSA submission number?
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
Meaning if you sent a card in,(of his) it would NOT grade Auth. or be deemed EOT.
And if it did he would refund.
Slap you are right feedback is useless, especially since it may be a buying account.
Al no blast from me to you. Just trying to explain.
When I sold raw or when i do sell raw I try not to claim a card is in a certain PSA grade.
I will though make the claim that IMO the card is in X or Y grade.
Would I refund a buyer in this specific case? Yeah I would. Because of his feedback, which I took the time to look at.
In any event Bobby asked a simple question and my answer is to that specific question is "some do and some do not'
It is not a given. Things should be spelled out.
Steve
<< <i>Just curious, but how can anyone guarantee a card is going to get a certain grade or be legit??? if this was the case every card I've bought in the past needs to go back to the seller since it didn't get the GEM MINT 10 I was expecting. >>
Al, did the seller guarantee that you would get the 10? Just because you
expected a card to grade at gem mint means nothing unless the seller made the claim.
As for the legitimacy part, I would think unless a seller specifically claims that the card is legit it is assumed that it is.
Steve
al.
<< <i>Just curious, but how can anyone guarantee a card is going to get a certain grade or be legit??? if this was the case every card I've bought in the past needs to go back to the seller since it didn't get the GEM MINT 10 I was expecting.....sorry I had to let that out. >>
There's a MAJOR difference between your concern about what you were EXPECTING versus what is advertised. I know MANY sellers that guarantee the accuracy and the legitimacy of their raw cards. I do the same. However, I will not advertise a card as GEM MINT and rarely MINT. Typically, I will call them at least NM/MT or better. Vintage is a different story, but I always guarantee the card is accurately graded. If the buyer doesn't agree, I offer an unconditional refund (I have NEVER had a request for a refund in more than 10 years of selling and NEVER had a negative feedback as a seller). I do not offer refunds on 3rd party graded cards, though.
<< <i>I don't expect 10's for every card but thought I'd show you three examples from auctions I've won...cards were listed as ex-nm and I was overall satisfied with the bulk of the purchase but no where did the auction say anything about MC's or ST's....if you use the arguement being surfaced here I should be able to go back and get my money back on these three because the auction didn't state it was possible to get MC's or ST's even though I know that it can happen and especially with this year of fleer.....guess what I'm trying to say is you are probably best to not say anthing relative to condition other than look at the scans.....oh well guess I should have napped this afternoon instead of checking the threads.....or is the intent to point out that this card is from a noted "supposed" trimmer???
al.
Let's see . . . EX/NM would be the NET grade for those.
al.
<< <i>If the card looks "sharp" I am curious as to why the OP/seller would not have it graded prior to selling. >>
I imagine the seller did, in fact, try to have this card graded, and then decided to pass the buck on to the next guy by selling it as a raw 'NM-MT' card when PSA kicked it back N1.
Assuming this is the auction in question--Mays auction-- I have a very hard time believing that anyone who routinely submits to PSA wouldn't have submitted this card for grading before selling it raw. If this isn't the auction of interest then it would interesting to see a link to the auction page of the card we're discussing.
<< <i>or is the intent to point out that this card is from a noted "supposed" trimmer??? >>
No. The intent from me (at least) was to ascertain why a 1955 Bowman Mays in possibly PSA 8 condition was being sold raw in
the first place. I've never knew Bobby to be known as a supposed trimmer. I've known him to be a decent ebayer and B/S/T
participant. Unless of course I am not understanding you and you are implying the buyer is a noted supposed trimmer?
Steve
<< <i>
<< <i>or is the intent to point out that this card is from a noted "supposed" trimmer??? >>
No. The intent from me (at least) was to ascertain why a 1955 Bowman Mays in possibly PSA 8 condition was being sold raw in
the first place. I've never knew Bobby to be known as a supposed trimmer. I've known him to be a decent ebayer and B/S/T
participant. Unless of course I am not understanding you and you are implying the buyer is a noted supposed trimmer?
Steve >>
LET ME STATE LOUDLY!!!....I AM IN NO WAY IMPLYING ANYONE IS A TRIMMER>>>>>>>
I was just trying to understand how you can send back a card to someone. Now I believe what I am hearing is that if someone states that a card can be graded then one should expect that it is graded and not returned EOT. And I guess my argument for the Fleer cards was answered by myself since with the two grade downturn it's right where the seller said they were......thanks everyone.
al.
<< <i>
<< <i>If the card looks "sharp" I am curious as to why the OP/seller would not have it graded prior to selling. >>
I imagine the seller did, in fact, try to have this card graded, and then decided to pass the buck on to the next guy by selling it as a raw 'NM-MT' card when PSA kicked it back N1.
Assuming this is the auction in question--Mays auction-- I have a very hard time believing that anyone who routinely submits to PSA wouldn't have submitted this card for grading before selling it raw. If this isn't the auction of interest then it would interesting to see a link to the auction page of the card we're discussing. >>
Yep, sure would like the OP to address this, especially when the raw card auction states "All of our graded cards have been authenticated by the best 3rd party graders available (PSA, SGC, & BGS/BVG). Anything not graded by one of these grading companies isn't worth the money paid for it."
Steve
<< <i>Yep, sure would like the OP to address this, especially when the raw card auction states "All of our graded cards have been authenticated by the best 3rd party graders available (PSA, SGC, & BGS/BVG). Anything not graded by one of these grading companies isn't worth the money paid for it." >>
I think you're misreading the last sentence. I believe he is saying the same thing I say, which in essence is, any card graded by a service other than the big three isn't worth the money you'll typically spend on it. I don't think he was referring to raw cards versus graded cards, as you, I believe, are implying.
Anything..........
choo chooo
Steve
<< <i>
<< <i>Yep, sure would like the OP to address this, especially when the raw card auction states "All of our graded cards have been authenticated by the best 3rd party graders available (PSA, SGC, & BGS/BVG). Anything not graded by one of these grading companies isn't worth the money paid for it." >>
I think you're misreading the last sentence. I believe he is saying the same thing I say, which in essence is, any card graded by a service other than the big three isn't worth the money you'll typically spend on it. I don't think he was referring to raw cards versus graded cards, as you, I believe, are implying. >>
Fair enough point Scott. But I wish Boo's post would be addressed. Why was the card sold raw?
<< <i>Fair enough point Scott. But I wish Boo's post would be addressed. Why was the card sold raw? >>
Because it is narrow top to bottom and the bottom edge looks "unoriginal." I'm not suggesting that the seller did anything other than offer the card for sale, but from the images provided, the card demonstrates, in my opinion, evidence of being trimmed.
Jeff
Miscut Museum
My Mess
Steve
Steve
you are a better person than me...
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
That way it will be in a slab and thus protected.
Maybe clean up that bat ear first......
Steve
<< <i>Yea...I guess I will have to.....as long as it is in the same shape and is the same card, I have no problem with that. I think the card looks sharp, and maybe I can get it signed (providing Mays can hold out a little while longer)..... >>
Still unsure why you didn't send it in for grading orginally. The last PSA 8 sold for over $600, and the last PSA 7 for $299.
Jeff
Miscut Museum
My Mess
<< <i>seems like if someone wanted to trim a card, they wouldn't put a curve in it >>
Ya think?
Steve
<< <i>Did someone else get an Etch-a-Sketch for summer break?