Check out this GSA 1882-CC Morgan Toner I just picked up!

coinkid855 · May 30, 2010 12:42AM

-Paul

AUandAG · May 30, 2010 12:47AM

nice and colorful for sure! right mint mark as well!! What's wrong with
that? Nada, good pickup up. MS62 would be my guess. But, who cares
the grade when you have those colors?

bob

coinkid855 · May 30, 2010 12:50AM

Thanks! I agree with your grade. I just imaged it here at the show because it's SLOW. lol

-Paul

kurtdog · May 30, 2010 1:03AM

I'll give that a 63 only because for the most part those are luster grazes on that obverse (as opposed deeper hits or scratches) and besides that they're in all the right or expected places.

One thing I've always wondered about toning in a GSA slab, how does that happen? We've recently seen "rainbow" or so-called "monster" toning in GSA slabs. The only thing I can figure is that's how the coins looked just before they went into the slabs?

coinkid855 · May 30, 2010 1:12AM

This one probably looked pretty much the same when it went in. It's in a "Silver Dollar" holder, not an "Uncirculated Silver Dollar" holder. Meaning the toning held it out of a regular holder.

-Paul

kaz · May 30, 2010 1:54AM

Pretty coin!

TonedCoinTrader · May 30, 2010 1:54AM

Very Pretty color combo! I bet it glows!

johnny9434 · May 30, 2010 2:00AM

pretty color and nice pick up

ricko · May 30, 2010 2:25AM

Sigh...... Cheers, RickO

coinkid855 · May 30, 2010 2:27AM

<< Sigh...... Cheers, RickO[/q

Haha

MorganChicken · May 30, 2010 2:37AM

Awesome color!

kurtdog · May 30, 2010 9:21AM

<< This one probably looked pretty much the same when it went in. It's in a "Silver Dollar" holder, not an "Uncirculated Silver Dollar" holder. Meaning the toning held it out of a regular holder. >>

Good point. At least in the minds of the government graders at the time, this one wasn't a "no brainer" (let's just call it) for an "Uncirculated Silver Dollar" holder. That of course doesn't mean it's not uncirculated. If anything, it means the "graders" weren't that sure.

I, again, see it as having no evidence of circulation wear. Pretty toning, too.

cheezhed · May 30, 2010 11:03AM

I'm really liking the symmetry of the toning.

divecchia · May 30, 2010 11:10AM

Love the toning on that beauty...

Donato

coinkid855 · May 31, 2010 8:20AM

<< Love the toning on that beauty...

Donato >>

Thanks!

-Paul

coinkid855 · June 1, 2010 1:14AM

Ok guys, I'm sending this coin ATS. You think it will star?

-Paul

blu62vette · June 1, 2010 1:18AM

no star.

joshieboi · June 1, 2010 3:05AM

Very Nice Coin! I believe that used to be my coin, funny how things get circulated around. Very Nice pic!

----------------------------
Freedom is never free
-Joshua

coinkid855 · June 1, 2010 3:06AM

<< Very Nice Coin! I believe that used to be my coin, funny how things get circulated around. Very Nice pic! >>

Haha, cool! It is a pretty coin. Thanks a lot!

-Paul

coinkid855 · June 18, 2010 1:18AM

Ok guys, coin came back. Unfortunately no star. MS62.

-Paul

STONE · June 18, 2010 1:35AM

<< Ok guys, coin came back. Unfortunately no star. MS62.

-Paul >>

Paul, I agree with the TPG ATS on this one. No star would have been my decision

golfer72 · June 18, 2010 2:00AM

I would give at a 63 ( the toning on the reverse bumps the overall grade up one point). Stars are meaningless. ( eye appeal is subjective). Very nice coin by the way.

cheezhed · June 18, 2010 2:07AM

No star is correct for this coin, but it is still very nice.

kryptonitecomics · June 18, 2010 2:34AM

<< 

<< Ok guys, coin came back. Unfortunately no star. MS62.

-Paul >>

Paul, I agree with the TPG ATS on this one. No star would have been my decision >>

+1 though the coin looks to have claims to an MS63 grade from what I can see.

dyolfbp · June 18, 2010 2:49AM

62 or 63...No real price difference. IMO looks like a decent 63

Check out this GSA 1882-CC Morgan Toner I just picked up!

Comments

Leave a Comment