Home Sports Talk

Greatest NFL franchise of all time?

In baseball, the question is easy - Yankees. No one disputes that.

In football, it's a harder question to answer.

So what's the greatest franchise of all time and how would you determine that? Championships won? Percentage of winning seasons? Number of HOFers?

I don't know but off the Top of my head, I'd say the franchises that have fielded good teams in almost every decade of their existence would be the Raiders and Cowboys. I think the Giants, 49ers and Colts would be contenders as well. Those five would be a good place to start the discussion anyway.

Thoughts?

Comments

  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would pick the Cowboys for the reasons you already mentioned. They hold the record for records. They made the playoffs for 20 years straight at one point which I believe is still a record. I don't know what team has the most HOF'ers. It's probably not Dallas since they didn't come in until 1960.

    But I will say again that the 92-93 Cowboys were the BEST team EVER !!! Theirs not another team that can match them up and down the lineup.

    Best O-line
    Best D-line
    Best running back
    Best recieving core
    Best TE
    And one of the best QB's
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,696 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would pick the Cowboys for the reasons you already mentioned.

    What a shock! I'm absolutely stunned at your selection!


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Pretty tough to go with a team other than the Steelers. But I would give more credit for having the higher peak, and that would be the Cowboys of the early 90s over the Steelers of the late 70s
    Tom
  • stevekstevek Posts: 29,037 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You state "all time" so that should mean pre Super Bowl IE the beginning of the NFL and if that is the parameter then I think that for most NFL fans of the game...either the Packers or Giants would come to mind first....perhaps the Giants with a slight edge.
  • I thin k the Rams could also be part of the discussion. They fielded some pretty good teams in the 50's, 70's, 80's and of course the greatest show on turf.
  • SDSportsFanSDSportsFan Posts: 5,136 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you go by number of championships won, Green Bay has it with 12. The Chicago Bears have won 9, Cleveland Browns 8, and the New York Giants 7.


    Steve
  • SDSportsFanSDSportsFan Posts: 5,136 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It would almost be easier to break it into two eras:

    Pre-Super Bowl Era: (1920 - 1965)
    Super Bowl Era: (1966 - Present)

    If you do that, the Packers are the best in the Pre-Super Bowl Era. They won championships in 1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962 and 1965.

    The Super Bowl Era would probably be between the Cowboys and the Steelers. The Cowboys have been to eight Super Bowls, winning five of them. The Steelers have been to seven Super Bowls, winning six.


    Steve


  • << <i>It would almost be easier to break it into two eras:

    Pre-Super Bowl Era: (1920 - 1965)
    Super Bowl Era: (1966 - Present)

    If you do that, the Packers are the best in the Pre-Super Bowl Era. They won championships in 1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962 and 1965.

    The Super Bowl Era would probably be between the Cowboys and the Steelers. The Cowboys have been to eight Super Bowls, winning five of them. The Steelers have been to seven Super Bowls, winning six.


    Steve >>




    IF your criteria is championships. I would tend to rate winning seasons and playoff appearances a little higher overall, since that translates over time to the perception of a successful franchise.
  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    <<<What a shock! I'm absolutely stunned at your selection!>>>

    Hey, I can't help it if I'm a fan of the best franchise in football!



    And Those Packers that won all of those Championships couldn't play with the 90's Cowboys or the 70's Steelers. Actually they probably couldn't play with half of the current teams today.

    Same goes for those great (NOT) 72 Dolphins! Yes, those are the same Dolphins that are the only team to go without a TD in a Super Bowl.

    1971- Dallas 24...... Fish 3 !
  • Comment about comparing earlier athletes with modern athletes, and not directed at anyone personally.


    I always find it interesting when people say players from older era's couldn't compete with modern athletes.

    Sure modern athlete's are bigger and faster. However, they've had the benefit of modern nutrition, training, and medical care. Raise up the modern athletes with 1920's standards and I guarantee older era athletes could compete with them.

    In fact, in many ways older era athletes are tougher, having to play under conditions that modern athletes would be calling their player rep and agents over.

    Earlier era athletes would be mentally tougher as well, without the grade school to retirement coddling that modern athletes get.

    Pound for pound, all things being equal, I'd take an earlier era athlete over a modern athlete any day.
  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    >>>Pound for pound, all things being equal, I'd take an earlier era athlete over a modern athlete any day.<<<

    Do you realize what you just said!? The old linemen would be giving up 100+ lbs. to stronger and faster lineman. It would be NO contest.

    Do you think the old DB's could cove the faster, taller and stronger recievers!? NO WAY !!

    I'm not putting the old guys down...it's just a fact!

    You could take the worst current team in the NFL and they would beat the 20's 30's 40's 50's teams.
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,696 ✭✭✭✭✭
    >>Pound for pound, all things being equal, I'd take an earlier era athlete over a modern athlete any day.<<<

    Do you realize what you just said!? The old linemen would be giving up 100+ lbs. to stronger and faster lineman. It would be NO contest.

    Do you think the old DB's could cove the faster, taller and stronger recievers!? NO WAY !!

    I'm not putting the old guys down...it's just a fact!

    You could take the worst current team in the NFL and they would beat the 20's 30's 40's 50's teams.


    Dime,

    I don't think you understood blackborder's post. If the players from today were raised and brought up like their counterparts from earlier eras, they wouldn't be 100 lbs heavier, they wouldn't have all the benefits that players have today as far as conditioning goes, and they wouldn't be as big or as quick, either. The opposite is also true. Can you imagine what Dick Butkus would have been like if he had all the benefits of modern conditioning and training? Guys back then weren't using PEDs either, which I'd guess that about half the league uses in one form or another these days.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • VitoCo1972VitoCo1972 Posts: 6,128 ✭✭✭
    I was thinking the Redskins should be in the discussion, but I just looked up their history - no championships from 42-82...so I would say the Packers based on championships.

    In the Super Bowl era, it almost has to be either the Steelers or Cowboys.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Da Bears.


    Steve


    edited to add:

    image
    Good for you.


  • << <i>>>>Pound for pound, all things being equal, I'd take an earlier era athlete over a modern athlete any day.<<<

    Do you realize what you just said!? The old linemen would be giving up 100+ lbs. to stronger and faster lineman. It would be NO contest.

    Do you think the old DB's could cove the faster, taller and stronger recievers!? NO WAY !!

    I'm not putting the old guys down...it's just a fact!

    You could take the worst current team in the NFL and they would beat the 20's 30's 40's 50's teams. >>




    Clearly, you didn't understand my post.
  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This will probably open a can of worms. BUT I don't think there is PED's in football. They have to take test at any time. I think their size quickness and strenght has to do with the work habits and training. Weight lifting which wasn't used back then is used by all sports. Look at the difference in basketball players now and back in the 60's and 70's.

    As far as Dick Buctus(sp) goes.. I would put him in the modern era AND he could play with anybody then AND now!
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,696 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This will probably open a can of worms. BUT I don't think there is PED's in football.


    Now, that is funny!

    But I admire your uptopian perspective!


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • VikingDudeVikingDude Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭
    More parity in the NFL. Therefore there is not a crystal-clear answer to which the majority of fans would agree to.


  • << <i>
    This will probably open a can of worms. BUT I don't think there is PED's in football.


    Now, that is funny!

    But I admire your uptopian perspective! >>




    More Pollyanna than utopian i think.


  • << <i>This will probably open a can of worms. BUT I don't think there is PED's in football. They have to take test at any time. I think their size quickness and strenght has to do with the work habits and training. Weight lifting which wasn't used back then is used by all sports. Look at the difference in basketball players now and back in the 60's and 70's.

    As far as Dick Buctus(sp) goes.. I would put him in the modern era AND he could play with anybody then AND now! >>



    Haha, I got a chuckle. I've been around these boards a long time and many know my stance and knowledge on PEDs. Sure, players have to take a test at any time, but it doesn't mean they take substances that cannot be detected or cycled properly to avoid detection. These are gazillionaires who have many different types of steroids/PEDs available to them, so they know the system - especially if they have an "expert" advising them. Kind of like the "natural" bodybuilding shows that drug test.

    Personally, I don't have much of an issue with it (other than the message for kids), but PEDs are used in the NFL.

    As far as the original question...good question.

    As much as I hate to say it, Green Bay deserves to be in the discussion. So do the Giants, Bears, 49ers, and Cowboys.

    How about the Cardinals? image
    image

    Remember these Chuck Norris Facts

    1. When Chuck Norris does a pushup, he isn't lifting himself up, he's pushing the Earth down
    2. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, Chuck Norris can actually roundhouse kick you yesterday
    3. There are no such things as lesbians, just women who have not yet met Chuck Norris
Sign In or Register to comment.