Options
Basal State grade??? Have you ever heard of this?

I just found this on a web site.
<< <i>Basal State (Basal) - You can identify the lump of metal as being a coin.
Basil state coins have extraordinarily low value. A basil state large cent, for example, might sell for a nickel. >>
I never heard of "Basal State".
Ray
<< <i>Basal State (Basal) - You can identify the lump of metal as being a coin.
Basil state coins have extraordinarily low value. A basil state large cent, for example, might sell for a nickel. >>
I never heard of "Basal State".
Ray
0
Comments
-Paul
<< <i>What does the PO stand for?? >>
Isnt that Poor?
<< <i>Yes, It's below PO-1. >>
I believe PO-1 *was* basal state in the original Sheldon reference, was it not?
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
thanks,
Ray
<< <i>
<< <i>Yes, It's below PO-1. >>
I believe PO-1 *was* basal state in the original Sheldon reference, was it not? >>
That's how I interpreted it when I started the ANACS grading service.
TD
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Yes, It's below PO-1. >>
I believe PO-1 *was* basal state in the original Sheldon reference, was it not? >>
That's how I interpreted it when I started the ANACS grading service.
TD >>
Hmmm..... gotta ask questions...
would you now say the definition has changed to define BS as lower than PO-01, or not changed?
I ask because:
<< <i>Basal State (Basal) - You can identify the lump of metal as being a coin. >>
differs from the Poor PCGS has:
<< <i>Poor
The grade PO-1. A coin with readable date and mint mark (if present), but little more, barely identifiable as to type. (One-year type coins do not require a readable date to qualify for this grade.)
See Also -- PO-1
PO-1
This is for "Poor" (the grade) and "1" (the numerical designation that means Poor). A coin of this grade is basically uncollectible due to its terrible condition, but coins of great rarity (such as an 1802 half dime) are still of considerable value and in demand in this grade. In order to "reach" this grade a coin must be identifiable as to date and type and not be horribly damaged (such as holes).
See Also -- Poor
>>
A PO-1 will immediately indicate it is a struck coin due to the amount of detail remaining. Some dateless coins can be graded PO-1 because of single issue years, like the 1964 Kennedy half dollar. There was only one year it was minted in 90% silver, a very identifiable trait.
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
Edited to add: I wonder how a TPG like PCGS would treat this coin? Would it get a Genuine Slab (if any at all) or could it possibly be slabbed as Basal State? Just curious. (Yes, I know, worthless without pictures...)
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
My #1 Low Ball Peace Dollar Set
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
...that’s something completely different.
Rainbow Stars
The original purpose of the Sheldon grading scale was to place values on large cents by variety using the Basil State value. There for if a coin was worth a $1 in BS-01, a coin in Fine -12 was worth $12, a VF-20 was worth $20 and so on.
Some years ago a collector gave me a group of dateless early large cents to identify. I don’t know very Sheldon numbers without the book, but I was amazed to find that I could pin point the varieties for all of them. It was a combination of looking at certain points and have sense from collecting early coins for many the approximate date by the die work. You would be amazed what you could spot from hand made dies. Once hubbing became the norm, things get a lot tougher.
A more modern coin without a date that can’t be attributed by date or variety is not a BS-01 on the Sheldon scale. You need to be able to come up with a date for the coin to be gradable.
Would that qualify as BS/PO-1??
<< <i>Kraljevich at FUN showed me a large cent fragment (1/4 of the coin, said to be useful for paying for the ferry, I believe) that he was able to attribute.
Would that qualify as BS/PO-1?? >>
From Bill Jones reply right above this question
The coin was also not supposed have any major damage.
I suspect 3/4 of a coin missing could be considered major damage.
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen