<< <i>Why? Please explain your plan in more detail. Thanks! >>
My plan was to crack, dip,and resubmit and hope for an MS 66.But i would need to get rid of the light brown on the reverse.....just for the fun of it and see what happens.
I did not think that toning this light would play any part at all in the grade. But then again, i'm no expert; no experience with this. That's why I asked; so that I could learn.
If that toning were ugly a dip might be in order, but it's so mild and even pleasant that I'm sure it won't negatively effect the grade. It's not going to get you an eye appeal bump either, but it certainly won't hurt you.
"YOU SUCK!" Awarded by nankraut/renomedphys 6/13/13 - MadMarty dissents
<< <i>Why? Please explain your plan in more detail. Thanks! >>
My plan was to crack, dip,and resubmit and hope for an MS 66.But i would need to get rid of the light brown on the reverse.....just for the fun of it and see what happens . >>
Another dipping and it will probally make AU55 with a shot at 58 if a little of the luster is left. It looks to me that it has allready had enouph dipping.
What are the diagnostics being used here to determine that this coin is previously dipped? Is it just the look of it? There is a certain washed out appearance to it, but I figured that was just the image. As far as the toning being evidence of past dipping, how does one arrive at that conclusion? I've got a handful of coins that I've dipped over the years and I haven't seen anything on them that screams dipped (I am pretty careful about how I dip). Is this just the product of experience talking? Maybe something that's evident after handling a few hundred dipped coins? Or is this just speculation.
Just curious.
"YOU SUCK!" Awarded by nankraut/renomedphys 6/13/13 - MadMarty dissents
I don't see a 66 happening on that coin, and would recommend selling it to someone who doesn't feel the urge to dip it before having it in hand. If you want it in PCGS plastic, try crossing it in the holder at 65 first.
Going by the image technically it might 66, but, when I see a coin that looks undergraded first thing I ask my self is why? Did they make a mistake or is there a reason. I give it the evil eye for hairlines hidden marks etc. But first thing on a coin such as this I look at the luster or lack of. In this image I don't see the pop/luster of a 66 coin.
Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>Ahh just wanted to get opinions out in the open about your future attempt at destroying coins? IMO you are no better then coin doctors who AT coins >>
If you knew Al you would not spew garbage like the above. What a tool!
<< <i>Ahh just wanted to get opinions out in the open about your future attempt at destroying coins? IMO you are no better then coin doctors who AT coins >>
If you knew Al you would not spew garbage like the above. What a tool!
Ken >>
Incorrect assumption on your part. I view people that dip coins the same way I view prople who AT coins, IMO they are coin doctors. While others think dipping is a great idea I view it as a way to alter the surface of a coin. I do not agree with people altering the surface of a coin in any way shape or form. While there are great arguments on both sides of this topic I look at it as altering a coins surfaces IMO dipping a coin destroys the original surfaces. There are numerous dips and various ways to go about it and several people who say it does nothing to the surface and several people who say it does alter the surface. This is simply my opinion based on information I have gathered over the years. Your name calling makes it clear that you are unable to have an adult conversation based on facts without resorting to childish acts.
I'd leave the coin be. From the image, I think it has too many contact marks on the skirt-lines to grade higher. It looks like a mid-grade 5 from the contact marks on the skirt-lines, which I've usually seen in this grade.
I did upgrade one in 5 to 6 in 1999. You need outstanding eye appeal for a 6, and I can't tell from the image whether this coin has it. Good eye appeal won't cut it. Also, my coin has no contact marks on the skirt-lines. It had a few on the eagle's wings on the reverse, which kept it from the coveted MS 67 grade.
"Vou invadir o Nordeste, "Seu cabra da peste, "Sou Mangueira......."
It was just a thought.I'm not going to dip the coin.Or crack it for that matter,besides i can't have Mike In Florida shedding any tears,it's been raining for two day's and we had enough wet weather.
Hey Ken.....look at what he sells and consider the source.
<< <i>Going by the image technically it might 66, but, when I see a coin that looks undergraded first thing I ask my self is why? Did they make a mistake or is there a reason. I give it the evil eye for hairlines hidden marks etc. But first thing on a coin such as this I look at the luster or lack of. In this image I don't see the pop/luster of a 66 coin. >>
The coin is currently an NGC 65.
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
"<It looks like that light brown was caused from a previous dip IMO. >
stman is right.
Take it from experience this coin was dipped before and was not washed off good enough, Hence the light brownish spots. You chance a diminished lustre on the coin with every redip, eventually it will looked washed out.
Comments
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
<< <i>Why? Please explain your plan in more detail. Thanks! >>
My plan was to crack, dip,and resubmit and hope for an MS 66.But i would need to get rid of
the light brown on the reverse.....just for the fun of it and see what happens.
If you do it, please report on what happens.
<< <i>
<< <i>Why? Please explain your plan in more detail. Thanks! >>
My plan was to crack, dip,and resubmit and hope for an MS 66.But i would need to get rid of
the light brown on the reverse.....just for the fun of it and see what happens
. >>
It looks to me that it has allready had enouph dipping.
Just curious.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>It looks like that light brown was caused from a previous dip IMO. >>
Al I go along with the above. Don't mess with it.
Ken
Leave it. I'd rather buy it thinking it hasn't been redipped in the last year.
The name is LEE!
I give it the evil eye for hairlines hidden marks etc. But first thing on a coin such as this I look at the luster or lack of. In this image I don't see the pop/luster of a 66 coin.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>Ahh just wanted to get opinions out in the open about your future attempt at destroying coins? IMO you are no better then coin doctors who AT coins
If you knew Al you would not spew garbage like the above. What a tool!
Ken
<< <i>
<< <i>Ahh just wanted to get opinions out in the open about your future attempt at destroying coins? IMO you are no better then coin doctors who AT coins
If you knew Al you would not spew garbage like the above. What a tool!
Ken >>
Incorrect assumption on your part. I view people that dip coins the same way I view prople who AT coins, IMO they are coin doctors. While others think dipping is a great idea I view it as a way to alter the surface of a coin. I do not agree with people altering the surface of a coin in any way shape or form. While there are great arguments on both sides of this topic I look at it as altering a coins surfaces IMO dipping a coin destroys the original surfaces. There are numerous dips and various ways to go about it and several people who say it does nothing to the surface and several people who say it does alter the surface. This is simply my opinion based on information I have gathered over the years. Your name calling makes it clear that you are unable to have an adult conversation based on facts without resorting to childish acts.
I did upgrade one in 5 to 6 in 1999. You need outstanding eye appeal for a 6, and I can't tell from the image whether this coin has it. Good eye appeal won't cut it. Also, my coin has no contact marks on the skirt-lines. It had a few on the eagle's wings on the reverse, which kept it from the coveted MS 67 grade.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
i can't have Mike In Florida shedding any tears,it's been raining for two day's and we
had enough wet weather.
Hey Ken
<< <i>Based on these images I don't see how a dip would benefit this coin. JMHO. >>
ditto!
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
<< <i>Every time a coin is dipped, MikeInFL sheds a tear. >>
commoncents123, JrGMan2004, Coll3ctor (2), Dabigkahuna, BAJJERFAN, Boom, GRANDAM, newsman, cohodk, kklambo, seateddime, ajia, mirabela, Weather11am, keepdachange, gsa1fan, cone10
-------------------------
I take back anything nice I said about that beautiful $10 Indian you posted the other day....
<< <i>
<< <i>Every time a coin is dipped, MikeInFL sheds a tear. >>
but he shouldn't shed a tear for this one because it's already been dipped before.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
<< <i>Every time a coin is dipped, MikeInFL sheds a tear. >>
<< <i>Going by the image technically it might 66, but, when I see a coin that looks undergraded first thing I ask my self is why? Did they make a mistake or is there a reason.
I give it the evil eye for hairlines hidden marks etc. But first thing on a coin such as this I look at the luster or lack of. In this image I don't see the pop/luster of a 66 coin. >>
The coin is currently an NGC 65.
The name is LEE!
Better chance with than without the toning.
bob
Please report to the nearest MiniTruth reprogramming center.
"<It looks like that light brown was caused from a previous dip IMO. >
stman is right.
Take it from experience this coin was dipped before and was not washed off good enough, Hence the light brownish spots.
You chance a diminished lustre on the coin with every redip, eventually it will looked washed out.
Krueger
Each time a coin is dipped irreversible transitions take place.
Can't tell from the pics whether it's Original or not BUT it is
what it is. Let it stay that way.