Recent pick up. Gave a bit more for it than a 65FH would have normally brought, but the coin is nice with original surfaces, great luster, and a light golden patina.
My current 4 with a newp or two to be added later. Thanks Bajjerfan, and I will be adding to my Morgan set!
1962 PF66 Franklin 9142307 (I believe ex--Silverchris via Las Vegas 2010) 1935-S San Diego MS65 8205764 (A newp that isn't on anyone's Doily radar--picked up at the 2009 LA ANA) 1890-O Morgan MS64 3123954 (From Bob White in the Portland area and also not on anyone's radar) 1896 Morgan MS63 7303514 (Toner picked up at the 2009 LA ANA also for dirt cheap)
And, as I said before, someone at the LA show REALLY got some Mercs. I scoured the floor and right at the front of a row (600-700???) in the upper right of a case, there were 5-6 common-date Mercs stacked up in Doilies. My heart jumped, but typical of my luck, when I asked the guy about them, I was met with a quick and furtive, "Oh, those are not for sale." No other clue as to their disposition.
I don't think you're allowed to take a census while the government is taking theirs..........
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
I have a 1908 PR64 Liberty Nickel to add to your census. (3130484)
I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector. Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
Edited: I think you have all of mine, except for the 98-o I have added.
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Will’sProoflikes
Got a call today from one of my favorite dealers who mentioned they had a Doily for me to see. I wanted the surprise, so I held off asking what it was until I showed up . . .
9156.60/7337976 1910-S $20 in MS60
Thankfully he called. He had thought of cracking it as it has a look that is a bit better than a '60'. Whew . . . . a narrow save!
The census shows none known so far in St. Gaudens . . . but I'm lookin' at a sweetie!
"The doily came from another board member." ----- It should start to become obvious by now that if the PCGS slab number is not included in this census, it will be very hard to keep it all straight.
Just sayin'.
~
"America suffers today from too much pluribus and not enough unum.".....Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
<< <i>"The doily came from another board member." ----- It should start to become obvious by now that if the PCGS slab number is not included in this census, it will be very hard to keep it all straight.
Just sayin'.
~ >>
It's been obvious the whole time, if it begins to become a problem I will delete everything that doesn't have a cert # and we will start again. I prefer the cert #, but in an effort to get people to contribute, I have allowed them to contribute by tagging their name on it. Some people are wierd about their cert numbers. As of yet I have not had any problems with duplicates. I am sure that will change eventually, and we shall see what happens.
Currently this is just a small sampling of the Doilies out there. If we had more people contribute, it could become something truly useful. Regardless, it does show strong trends toward some coins over others that appear in Doilies (Morgan anyone?)
Thanks for the contributions, sorry robkool for missing your Franklin, I got it now.
Remember that these were holdered for a few weeks just 3 years after PCGS was born. I'd say that people weren't very selective about what they submitted even then.
Skyman, 1964-D Roosevelt MS64, Sample, 7000023. It's interesting that silverchris and I have the EXACT SAME cert number. I've owned my Sample since I received it when it first came out, so we are clearly not duplicating our coins, yet our cert numbers are the same.
<< <i>Skyman, 1964-D Roosevelt MS64, Sample, 7000023. It's interesting that silverchris and I have the EXACT SAME cert number. I've owned my Sample since I received it when it first came out, so we are clearly not duplicating our coins, yet our cert numbers are the same. >>
Is it common for all like samples to have the same cert number?
I believe all similar sample slabs have the same cert numbers. That has been my observation with the earlier types that were not Doilies. The earlier 'shell' slabs were the same way. Every Roosie Rattler I have seen had the same number as well, although my statistical sampling is about 3.
<< <i>Skyman, 1964-D Roosevelt MS64, Sample, 7000023. It's interesting that silverchris and I have the EXACT SAME cert number. I've owned my Sample since I received it when it first came out, so we are clearly not duplicating our coins, yet our cert numbers are the same. >>
Is it common for all like samples to have the same cert number? >>
I, myself, have a 'shell' slab (a 2.0 from Conder's slab generation thread), and it, also, has the cert # of 7000023. I had a few of them, as there's something about those 2.0 'shell' slabs....the 2 I sold also had the same cert...7000023. I'm guessing they are also ALL graded MS64.
Bay Bridge MS64 5110439 is now a "Drunner" coin . . . and a new one, Columbian 1893 MS64 6248362 now resides in the Drunner Doily Collection. (Thanks jmesq)
Thanks Billet7 for keeping the Census up to date !!!!
Oh . . . lost out on the eBay $20 1908 Saint Doily while at a coin show in Florence, OR. Too bad . . . wanted it badly but the BIN got me and had no computer access during a critical time. Dang!!!!
Wow . . . am I bummed. I guess I need to join the cell phone and laptop generation. It cost me the Saint !!!! If I had the opportunity to pull the trigger when we stood out there on the sidewalk I surely would have. I appreciate your help and guess this loss will propel me into the 21st Century. I wonder if the buyer will keep the holder or crack it and lose the Doily to the Census forever . . . I'll keep my eyesd open for it though! I tried as soon as I got to the hotel room . . . but it was gone.
Any other Doilies . . I'll be happy to go after them if you don't want them.
Great to see you in Florence . .and good luck on those 3.5s !!!!!!!!!
Comments
john
john
Thanks Al!
The name is LEE!
1962 PF66 Franklin 9142307 (I believe ex--Silverchris via Las Vegas 2010)
1935-S San Diego MS65 8205764 (A newp that isn't on anyone's Doily radar--picked up at the 2009 LA ANA)
1890-O Morgan MS64 3123954 (From Bob White in the Portland area and also not on anyone's radar)
1896 Morgan MS63 7303514 (Toner picked up at the 2009 LA ANA also for dirt cheap)
And, as I said before, someone at the LA show REALLY got some Mercs. I scoured the floor and right at the front of a row (600-700???) in the upper right of a case, there were 5-6 common-date Mercs stacked up in Doilies. My heart jumped, but typical of my luck, when I asked the guy about them, I was met with a quick and furtive, "Oh, those are not for sale." No other clue as to their disposition.
I'll post some Doily observations later.
Drunner
Walkers
1940 MS65 6202019
1943 MS66 6245317
1945-D MS65 6249536
Morgans
1884-O MS63 8187732
1884-O MS64 7339241
1884-O MS63 7303027
1897 MS65 7338298
1900-O MS63 5110640
1900-O MS63 5110090
1904-O MS64 8179518
1904-O MS63 8183446
Peace
1924 MS65 6245661
Drunner
i really like this post thanks for keeping up with it
Thanks Tom
<< <i>I don't think you're allowed to take a census while the government is taking theirs.......... >>
Thanks, I am happy to do it, so long as people keep feeding me information to keep it updated.
1882-S Morgan $1 Cert. # 7338331
Always looking for those Doilies !!!!!
Drunner
MS65. A spot on a star at 3:00 . . but accurately graded. Of all the Doilies I have, only 4-5 would actually be considered "upgrade candidates".
I think most of the Doilies out there now have been cracked if they really are upgrade options.
Still looking . . .any Doilies . . just let me know!
Drunner
I have 6 dealers actively searching, but they are RARE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Drunner
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
1880-s 64pl 7305495
1881-cc 63dmpl 7303045
1881-s 64pl 6218980
1882-cc 63pl 7306788
1887 64dmpl 8180608
1898-o 62dmpl 8183940
1900-o 62dmpl 8180582
Edited: I think you have all of mine, except for the 98-o I have added.
Will’sProoflikes
Lance.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
CoinKat, when you find out for sure, please let me know and I will add it to the census.
Edit: confirmed as a 66.
Stewart Huckaby
mailto:stewarth@HA.com
------------------------------------------
Heritage Auctions
Heritage Auctions
2801 W. Airport Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75261
Phone: 1-800-US-COINS, x1355
Heritage Auctions
<< <i>Mine are as follows: (obviously all morgans)
1880-s 64pl 7305495
1881-cc 63dmpl 7303045
1881-s 64pl 6218980
1882-cc 63pl 7306788
1887 64dmpl 8180608
1898-o 62dmpl 8183940
1900-o 62dmpl 8180582
Edited: I think you have all of mine, except for the 98-o I have added. >>
One day I am going to find a DMPL one before you get to it.
9156.60/7337976 1910-S $20 in MS60
Thankfully he called. He had thought of cracking it as it has a look that is a bit better than a '60'. Whew . . . . a narrow save!
The census shows none known so far in St. Gaudens . . . but I'm lookin' at a sweetie!
Drunner
1939 Dime in 64
Lane
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
<< <i>You can also add a 1954 MS64 Franklin half to that list... The doily came from another board member. >>
Hey Simon... You forgot to include this one ^^^
"The doily came from another board member."
-----
It should start to become obvious by now that if
the PCGS slab number is not included in this census,
it will be very hard to keep it all straight.
Just sayin'.
~
"America suffers today from too much pluribus and not enough unum.".....Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
1838 Reed edge AU50! 6247335
Franklin-Lover's Forum
<< <i>"The doily came from another board member."
-----
It should start to become obvious by now that if
the PCGS slab number is not included in this census,
it will be very hard to keep it all straight.
Just sayin'.
~ >>
It's been obvious the whole time, if it begins to become a problem I will delete everything that doesn't have a cert # and we will start again. I prefer the cert #, but in an effort to get people to contribute, I have allowed them to contribute by tagging their name on it. Some people are wierd about their cert numbers. As of yet I have not had any problems with duplicates. I am sure that will change eventually, and we shall see what happens.
Currently this is just a small sampling of the Doilies out there. If we had more people contribute, it could become something truly useful. Regardless, it does show strong trends toward some coins over others that appear in Doilies (Morgan anyone?)
Thanks for the contributions, sorry robkool for missing your Franklin, I got it now.
U.S. Type Set
<< <i>Skyman, 1964-D Roosevelt MS64, Sample, 7000023. It's interesting that silverchris and I have the EXACT SAME cert number. I've owned my Sample since I received it when it first came out, so we are clearly not duplicating our coins, yet our cert numbers are the same. >>
Is it common for all like samples to have the same cert number?
Drunner
Thanks
Chris
I'm still waiting on a Buff. Picked up that Merc a few posts up . . the 1942.
Good huntin' !!!!
Drunner
<< <i>
<< <i>Skyman, 1964-D Roosevelt MS64, Sample, 7000023. It's interesting that silverchris and I have the EXACT SAME cert number. I've owned my Sample since I received it when it first came out, so we are clearly not duplicating our coins, yet our cert numbers are the same. >>
Is it common for all like samples to have the same cert number? >>
I, myself, have a 'shell' slab (a 2.0 from Conder's slab generation thread), and it, also, has the cert # of 7000023. I had a few of them, as there's something about those 2.0 'shell' slabs....the 2 I sold also had the same cert...7000023. I'm guessing they are also ALL graded MS64.
Thanks Billet7 for keeping the Census up to date !!!!
Oh . . . lost out on the eBay $20 1908 Saint Doily while at a coin show in Florence, OR. Too bad . . . wanted it badly but the BIN got me and had no computer access during a critical time. Dang!!!!
Drunner
I saved a picture of the $20 Sait you missed out on and I am providing a picture of the Vermont Commem as well.
I don't own the above two coins, I just found them for the census.
However, I do own the following Gettysburg and a Texas Commemorative with cert#6219047 a PCGS MS63 with a cracked outer ring.
Seated Dollar Collection
Wow . . . am I bummed. I guess I need to join the cell phone and laptop generation. It cost me the Saint !!!! If I had the opportunity to pull the trigger when we stood out there on the sidewalk I surely would have. I appreciate your help and guess this loss will propel me into the 21st Century. I wonder if the buyer will keep the holder or crack it and lose the Doily to the Census forever . . . I'll keep my eyesd open for it though! I tried as soon as I got to the hotel room . . . but it was gone.
Any other Doilies . . I'll be happy to go after them if you don't want them.
Great to see you in Florence . .and good luck on those 3.5s !!!!!!!!!
Drunner (Doily Collector !!!)