Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

MS67 VS MS68 LINCOLN CENT?

What is the difference between an MS67 and an MS68? Will PCGS explain if I send a coin in what imperfections the coin has to make it a MS67, or MS66 or even an MS68? If it comes back MS70 then there should be no explination. Will a few raised dots on an 1983-D lincoln cause the grade to be lower?

Anyone with a picture of an MS68 & MS67 PCGS Lincoln cent?


Thanks,
Big Tony from Texas! Cherrypicking fool!!!!!!

Comments

  • STEWARTBLAYNUMISSTEWARTBLAYNUMIS Posts: 2,697 ✭✭✭✭

    PCGS has more liability with an ms 68 than an ms 67. PCGS use to explain what imperfections a coin has to make it an ms 67 or ms 66. It was called Presidential review. However they stopped that service.
    A few dots as you call them are bubbles in the planchet and the graders have to determine if they are detrimental to the eye appeal of the coin.

    Stewart
  • I doubt they would do that for you, because then EVERYONE would want an explanation on why their coin is a 66 instead of a 67, or a 67 instead of a 68.

    As for an MS68 Lincoln I'd like to see one also. I'm sure their are some satin finish ones out there but if anyone has a MS68 95% copper I'd love to see it.
  • DropdaflagDropdaflag Posts: 810 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I thought Stewart had a 69 in his collection. Maybe someone could post a link to pics for us.
  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    have you seen the PCGS Guide to Grading book?
    LCoopie = Les
  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭
    Stewart's 1911 68RD:

    imageimage

    his 1918 68RD:

    image
    image

    his 1923 68RD:

    imageimage

    Thomas Irwin's 1930 68RD:

    imageimage

    his 1937 68RD:

    imageimage

    and finally, Mr. Irwin's 39-D 68RD:

    imageimage

    I got all of these photos from Coingallery.org, and all of the photo credit goes to forum member shylock, who doesn't seem to post much anymoreimage You should really check that site out if you want to see some truly tough high end Lincolns, in addition to the many other impressive coins that are posted there.
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,830 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I thought Stewart had a 69 in his collection. Maybe someone could post a link to pics for us. >>



    I think this is the one you are referring to.

    imageimage
  • dlmtortsdlmtorts Posts: 743 ✭✭✭
    All I can say about those pics is WOWWW
  • mdwoodsmdwoods Posts: 5,559 ✭✭✭
    Amazing copper. The beard detail in the 1919 is just unreal.
    National Register Of Big Trees

    We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭
    Wow!!!

    I could actually shave Lincoln's beard on that 1919.

    Joe.
  • PCcoinsPCcoins Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭
    The strike on the 1919 is unreal!!!!!!!


    WOW! image
    "It is what it is."
  • bigtonydallasbigtonydallas Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭
    BEAUTIFUL COINS. I THINK THE 1919 SHOULD GET A 69 FOR THE DETAIL IN THE BEARD!
    Big Tony from Texas! Cherrypicking fool!!!!!!
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>BEAUTIFUL COINS. I THINK THE 1919 SHOULD GET A 69 FOR THE DETAIL IN THE BEARD! >>



    That beard almost looks like its ALIVE!
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • tahoe98tahoe98 Posts: 11,388 ✭✭✭

    ......all mysteries are settled with the charley alpha charley bean. code talk to help prevent software nuking.image
    "government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington
  • mkman123mkman123 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭
    holy crap, the MS69 lincoln has crazy beard detail that the MS67 and 68 don't even have!!!!
    Successful Buying and Selling transactions with:

    Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
  • Wow those are some crazy pictures thanks for sharing! Like everyone else said that beard on the '19 is just unreal!
  • ChrisRxChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭
    Agreed. And that 19' does not look like it is just a plain business strike with that much detail. Looks like it has to be a special strike of some sort.
    image
  • speetyspeety Posts: 5,424
    Didn't Stewart pull the 1919 out of a roll that also contained multiple MS-68s and MS-67s?
    Want to buy an auction catalog for the William Hesslein Sale (December 2, 1926). Thanks to all those who have helped us obtain the others!!!

  • droopyddroopyd Posts: 5,381 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Didn't Stewart pull the 1919 out of a roll that also contained multiple MS-68s and MS-67s? >>



    Probably the first ones struck using those particular dies, I would guess.
    Me at the Springfield coin show:
    image
    60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
  • Halfhunter06Halfhunter06 Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭
    incredible
  • That 1930 is fully strck? Dont think so. No 68 there


  • << <i>

    << <i>Didn't Stewart pull the 1919 out of a roll that also contained multiple MS-68s and MS-67s? >>



    Probably the first ones struck using those particular dies, I would guess. >>





    Maybe Stewart should get First Strike™ designation? image

    image

    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • Yep, I guess the 1930-P is a low end 68? Just doesn't cut the mustard in the presence of the others.

    But, could just be the pix.
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • STONESTONE Posts: 15,275


    << <i>Yep, I guess the 1930-P is a low end 68? Just doesn't cut the mustard in the presence of the others.

    But, could just be the pix. >>


    What about the '23 with the huge scratch between the forehead and hair-line?
    IMO that coin is not better than a 66!

    Stewart or Don, any comments?
    (And I know grading is subjective and not plausible from pics, but enlighten me on this)
  • SwampboySwampboy Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>What about the '23 with the huge scratch between the forehead and hair-line? >>



    Looks as minted to me.
    I guess it's a matter of opinion how much it detracts.

    "Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso

  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    FB
    full beard
    LCoopie = Les
  • DropdaflagDropdaflag Posts: 810 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yeah!!! That is the one. I think that is the largest pics I have seen of the coin. Just Wonderful!!!
  • This content has been removed.
  • illini420illini420 Posts: 11,466 ✭✭✭✭✭
    All of these beautiful 75+ year old 95% copper Lincolns that are bright red and spot-free and I get a note with my 2009 mint set that the Mint doesn't know how to keep 95% copper cents from tarnishing image
  • bigtonydallasbigtonydallas Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭
    On the 1919 MS69. Truely a beautiful coin.

    What would this coin go for at auction? 50K? 75k? ??
    Big Tony from Texas! Cherrypicking fool!!!!!!
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,830 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>On the 1919 MS69. Truely a beautiful coin.

    What would this coin go for at auction? 50K? 75k? ?? >>



    I think he turns down both of those numbers added together.
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 1919 is spectacular. Your eye is drawn to the beard detail because of the reflected light.

    But look elsewhere. Lincoln's eye, for example. I have never seen such detail on an MS Lincoln. And yet it is oddly missing the furrows above the eyebrow, so prominent for strikes of that era. The cheek and forehead are also unusually smooth.

    I wonder if this business strike was done with proof dies. The Mint was known to do that. Whatever the case, I would guess you will need more than money. You will have to pry this from Stewart's cold, dead hands.
    Lance.
  • shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    Stewart's & Gerry's coins imaged in 2003/4 with a Nikon Coolpix 995
    (with less megapixels than most cell phones these days but with a kick ass lens on that camera...and Ott Lightingimage).

    I think Stewart answered the question of how it was made on the original post in 2003.

    From an original roll, but he had to resubmit a group of 68RDs from that roll to get the 69RD.
    Sometimes the graders need to see a "group pose" of 68 RDs to see how much better one coin really is.
    That's the only way you get a coin like this made at that grade.
  • shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    PS: I'd love to be a fly on the wall in the grading room when the 69RD was made
    and how much scrutiny dishing out that grade took on behalf of PCGS.

    We will never see that grade again on early Lincolns.
  • DropdaflagDropdaflag Posts: 810 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The 1919 is spectacular. Your eye is drawn to the beard detail because of the reflected light.

    But look elsewhere. Lincoln's eye, for example. I have never seen such detail on an MS Lincoln. And yet it is oddly missing the furrows above the eyebrow, so prominent for strikes of that era. The cheek and forehead are also unusually smooth.

    I wonder if this business strike was done with proof dies. The Mint was known to do that. Whatever the case, I would guess you will need more than money. You will have to pry this from Stewart's cold, dead hands.
    Lance. >>



    No! Just buy it from the person that gets it in the will.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file