Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Guess the grades? Slabs added PSASETGUY & MINE

jimradjimrad Posts: 2,777 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
#1image#2image
#1PSASETGUYimage#2MINEimage
Positive transactions with: Bkritz,Bosox1976,Brick,captainthreeputt,cpettimd,craigger,cwazzy,DES1984,Dboneesq,daddymc,Downtown1974,EAsports,EagleEyeKid,fattymacs,gameusedhoop,godblessUSA,goose3,KatsCards,mike22y2k,
MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax

Comments

  • cwazzycwazzy Posts: 3,257 ✭
    6 & 9? Nice cards! I'm not a hockey fan but I love the vintage hockey sets.
    Chris
    My small collection
    Want List:
    '61 Topps Roy Campanella in PSA 5-7
    Cardinal T206 cards
    Adam Wainwright GU Jersey
  • larryallen73larryallen73 Posts: 6,069 ✭✭✭
    8, 9
  • Nathaniel1960Nathaniel1960 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭✭✭
    6, 8
    Kiss me once, shame on you.
    Kiss me twice.....let's party.
  • EagleEyeKidEagleEyeKid Posts: 4,496 ✭✭
    One of those tricks questions where the nicer one got a lower grade
    than the obvious.

    I'll say 8 left, 7 right. Who knows anymore.
  • jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,951 ✭✭✭✭
    #1 = 4
    #2 = 7

    Did I win yet?
  • swartz1swartz1 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭
    7,9


    Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
    - uncut


    Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
  • initialDinitialD Posts: 1,624 ✭✭✭


    << <i>One of those tricks questions where the nicer one got a lower grade
    than the obvious.

    I'll say 8 left, 7 right. Who knows anymore. >>



    image

    I say 8 or 9 on the left

    and 8 on the right
  • VintageCardLoverVintageCardLover Posts: 584 ✭
    ooo this is going to be sneaky. the one that looks the best got the low grade didnt it! hmmm
  • georgebailey2georgebailey2 Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭
    #1 - 6; #2 - 9
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    6.5 and 5

    the 5 obviously looks like a 9 but has a wrinkle??
    maybe on the top right corner area??
  • lawnmowermanlawnmowerman Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭
    Wow, that is a dam shame. Love the ding in the upper edge of psasetguy's card

    Since when does 4 heavily touched corners = a 9?

    1994 Pro Line Live

    TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject

  • mrmint23mrmint23 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭
    Could the .5 lower be to the "asteroid" beside his left ankle? Nice Card.
  • MeteoriteGuyMeteoriteGuy Posts: 7,140 ✭✭
    The PSASetGuy (PSG) card looks overgraded....I IMO it is an 8.

    I picked up a rare PSA 10 from PSG the other week that has a touched corner. Was a little disappointed, but the card is a hard 9, and I didn't pay much for it, so I am still happy with the card....just not really the grade and therefore price I paid.

    Clear Skies,
    Mark
    Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards.
    Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
  • CNoteCNote Posts: 2,070 ✭


    << <i>Wow, that is a dam shame. Love the ding in the upper edge of psasetguy's card

    Since when does 4 heavily touched corners = a 9? >>



    When they have former graders working for them and submit only 9's or 10's apparently.....
  • EagleEyeKidEagleEyeKid Posts: 4,496 ✭✭
    That does suck. The corners on PSG's card look soft too.
    Your card looks a lot better than his.
  • lawnmowermanlawnmowerman Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Wow, that is a dam shame. Love the ding in the upper edge of psasetguy's card

    Since when does 4 heavily touched corners = a 9? >>



    When they have former graders working for them and submit only 9's or 10's apparently..... >>



    Regardless of what the flip says, that card is not a 9

    1994 Pro Line Live

    TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject

  • SDavidSDavid Posts: 1,584 ✭✭
    Don't PSG's cards almost always look soft in their scans?
  • jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,951 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Don't PSG's cards almost always look soft in their scans? >>



    Yes, they need to invest in a scanner that has a charge-coupled device (CCD). So do I, for that matter. My slabs are all fuzzy like that, due to the distance from the scanner's glass to the actual card in the plastic case.
  • CrimsonTiderCrimsonTider Posts: 1,381 ✭✭✭
    It is really difficult to tell by the scans. I believe that the 8.5 is a much better scan. The 9 has a fuzzy scan and does not have a black background. I'm going to go with PSA on this one and say that the 9 has an horrible scan with a white background, thus causing shadows which makes the card look as if it has touched corners.

    I would like to see these two side by side.

    I could be wrong.
    collecting Dale Murphy and OPC
  • 41GoudeyGuy41GoudeyGuy Posts: 565 ✭
    Gonna need a scan of the back to accurately grade these two cards. From the front you got jobbed. I've been noticing that back centering has been killing some of my grades. Something I didn't pay a lot of attention to before. Also, different scanning equipment makes a huge difference. Scan his on your machine and yours on the other machine and we'd probably complain about the grade you got.
    Learn some history of the game. Join a vintage base ball team in your area and get out there.
    Simsbury Taverneers
    My PSA Sets
Sign In or Register to comment.