Home U.S. Coin Forum

Coin Facts is beginning to shape up, with many new images

I don't go there often, but recently I was looking at several dates in the CBH series, and found the following:

For the year 1827, there are multiple images of grades between MS64 and AU 50.

All the 1823 varities are imaged, with close ups of the various "3" types.

The data is still lacking, on auction results, some only going back 2 years.

But, it is evolving slowly, and I believe in a few years, it may be our best source for images, and sales.
TahoeDale

Comments

  • Oh speaking of coin facts I need to cancel that membership.

  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,445 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Agree - things are looking up with CoinFacts. image
    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
  • GoldbullyGoldbully Posts: 17,783 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Oh speaking of coin facts I need to cancel that membership. >>



    Why announce this on the Coin Forum that our hosts finance and give you a public voice for the community?

    Oh, and no one cares about your cancellation.

    One more thing, check your Key Largo coin link because it is broken.....and that's a fact.
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,810 ✭✭✭✭✭
    5 1/2 year old thread GB.image
  • GoldbullyGoldbully Posts: 17,783 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>5 1/2 year old thread GB.image >>



    Thanks Bob, I did not realize that......but 5½ years later does not excuse soty27's annoying statement. image
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,810 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>5 1/2 year old thread GB.image >>



    Thanks Bob, I did not realize that......but 5½ years later does not excuse soty27's annoying statement. image >>



    True!! He's also been gone about that long.
  • 3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>5 1/2 year old thread GB.image >>



    Thanks Bob, I did not realize that......but 5½ years later does not excuse soty27's annoying statement. image >>



    True!! He's also been gone about that long. >>



    ...then he came back as himself I believe...only to be bammed again...I remeber the topic was AT OGH rattler gassing and eBay listings of such. I'm just guessing though image

    Erik
  • When I submitted a coin for reconsideration last year, I made it clear to PCGS, not to photograph my coin, in the unlikely event that it didn't upgrade to a "plus". Well they didn't award the coin a plus???, and they didn't photograph my coin, which is too bad for the coin facts community, because the coin is hands down as nice as there is in the series.

    This equates to a bordeaux wine collector of Lafite Rothschild missing the 1961 vintage. Wah wah wah wah!

    Or a Corvette collector unable to secure a 1963 fastback split window. Oh well.

    Without an image of my coin, coin facts is well, incomplete!
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,370 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>When I submitted a coin for reconsideration last year, I made it clear to PCGS, not to photograph my coin, in the unlikely event that it didn't upgrade to a "plus". Well they didn't award the coin a plus???, and they didn't photograph my coin, which is too bad for the coin facts community, because the coin is hands down as nice as there is in the series.

    This equates to a bordeaux wine collector of Lafite Rothschild missing the 1961 vintage. Wah wah wah wah!

    Or a Corvette collector unable to secure a 1963 fastback split window. Oh well.

    Without an image of my coin, coin facts is well, incomplete! >>



    I found a 63 split window fast back in a barn with my neighbor. It was in great condition considering. He fixed it up only to have a tornado come through and put his garage on top of the car.
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,810 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>When I submitted a coin for reconsideration last year, I made it clear to PCGS, not to photograph my coin, in the unlikely event that it didn't upgrade to a "plus". Well they didn't award the coin a plus???, and they didn't photograph my coin, which is too bad for the coin facts community, because the coin is hands down as nice as there is in the series.

    This equates to a bordeaux wine collector of Lafite Rothschild missing the 1961 vintage. Wah wah wah wah!

    Or a Corvette collector unable to secure a 1963 fastback split window. Oh well.

    Without an image of my coin, coin facts is well, incomplete! >>


    That's an owner's opinion. That always add 1-2 points.

    Requesting not to have it photographed and coming here saying CF in incomplete because of it is presumptuous. As far as anyone here knows it isn't a 1961 vintage.
  • It is indeed an owner's opinion. But my opinion is shared with two of the sharpest set of eyes in numismatics!

    Obviously without seeing the coin, people here don't know. That's okay, the coin speaks for itself!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file