It's a cleaned, artificially-toned POS... but I like it! UPDATE: PCGS holdered it.
![coinpictures](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/PRUSSIA_3MP_1910A1.gif)
My local b&m had it in the case, and I just had to have it. In one way it's a complete travesty, but
in another, it's quite alluring...
Most likely the toning is residual from the cleaning rather than intentional?
The $64,000 question, of course, is "Will it sticker?"![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif)
![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif)
![image](http://www.numismotography.com/coins/us_25c_1899_20090708_o.jpg)
![image](http://www.numismotography.com/coins/us_25c_1899_20090708_r.jpg)
in another, it's quite alluring...
Most likely the toning is residual from the cleaning rather than intentional?
The $64,000 question, of course, is "Will it sticker?"
![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif)
![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif)
![image](http://www.numismotography.com/coins/us_25c_1899_20090708_o.jpg)
![image](http://www.numismotography.com/coins/us_25c_1899_20090708_r.jpg)
0
Comments
Will’sProoflikes
<< <i>Is the cleaning more obvious in hand? >>
Well now that I look at it under a 10x loupe (didn't have one with me when I bought the coin), it's not bad at all for a circ coin. I guess I just assumed that it was harshly cleaned. The contrast between device and field is high enough that it probably has been cleaned, but I take back the "harshly" part...
I can't imagine these color patterns could be in any way natural though... could they?
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
More often you see the ugly yellow/brownish toning from those albums though. Would ALMOST rather see a wire brush job than that yellow color. Said almost if you missed it so no flames please.
I like that, more than just a little bit.
<< <i>Looks more like a whitman push in style album toned coin that someone rubbed with their thumb to get some of the color off. >>
I agree. Long ago cleaned, then sat in an old Whitman cardboard album in a slightly damp atmosphere. Finally - someone finger rubbed it. These coins will actually come back graded from time to time.
It might have been dipped and re-toned over time, but... it looks pretty okay overall.
It was probably "Dipped" then place in an album.
Here is one that I pulled out of an album, sure makes your POS look like a winner
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
Garrow
Start out with winner and by the end of the thread it’s one you should have left in the dealers case.
Get it into a XF-45 first before wondering if it will sticker.
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
<< <i>Get it into a XF-45 first before wondering if it will sticker.
The sticker comment was a joke, if you couldn't tell. My assumption all along has been that this coin will not holder.
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
PCGS thought the color is real. Grade just posted: VF35. I personally think it's an XF, but I'm not going to quibble. The overall aesthetic is more important than the technical grade on this one IMO.
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
<< <i>I tossed it into a submission to fill up a form.
PCGS thought the color is real. Grade just posted: VF35. I personally think it's an XF, but I'm not going to quibble. The overall aesthetic is more important than the technical grade on this one IMO. >>
I think it is an XF too. I agree with them on the color (like I said earlier) and my guess is they knocked you down a peg because of the prior light cleaning and more recent finger rub, deservedly really. That coin would still flip for XF40 money (if not 45) no problem IMHO. Which is another reason I suspect they were perfectly comfortable knocking the coin down a grade level.
But I'm not the grader or PCGS - so what the hell do I know? Grats on the coin holdered or raw. I far prefer that type of toning to the neon bullseye that almost always looks artificial to me (even if it isn't).
<< <i>VF35 is murder for that coin. It looks choice XF. >>
Maybe it was silently net graded.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
...now send it to CAC to get your gold sticker and you're in business...
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
<< <i>
<< <i>VF35 is murder for that coin. It looks choice XF. >>
Maybe it was silently net graded. >>
or they actually decided to grade to the standard that was used
20+ years ago. vf35 actually used to have some luster left. xf45 used
to actually have a LOT of luster left.
One man's POS is another man's treasure.
The ANA offers a "problem coins" course at the ANA Summer Seminar. The best way to learn is to look at many, many coins.
<< <i>I tossed it into a submission to fill up a form.
PCGS thought the color is real. Grade just posted: VF35. I personally think it's an XF, but I'm not going to quibble. The overall aesthetic is more important than the technical grade on this one IMO. >>
Wow!!! I would feel like I just "won the lottery" so-to-speak if I were you based on the fact that PCGS didn't throw that coin into a "Genuine" holder. I do like the coin very much.