As for the coin itself, I don't know if I made myself clear that I think it is very attractive and likely much more original than the vast majority of extant pieces on the market.
This is a tough call. I tend not to like the fine graininess that I see in the surfaces. My concerns center on the possibility that this piece has been re-colored and that the reagent used to do the coloring etched the surfaces slightly.
Here’s a coin in a similar grade that is in a PCGS EF-45 holder. You can compare the general look between the two pieces.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
I bought it raw figuring that given its age it would grade. NGC gave it a body bag for "improper cleaning," and it cost me $1,000 to get rid of it back to the dealer from whence it came.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
I understand your concern....that '96 qtr looks more original to me than the '95 half does....I like the detail on the '95, but the surfaces look a little suspect, if 'slabability' is your goal.
Thank's guys for the input.Just got this email from Dave Wnuck.Hope the buyer enjoys it
Hi Al:
Just after I sent you that email, someone ordered the 1795 50c. Apparently someone posted the image of it on the "PCGS Chat Room" where it was seen by someone building a type coin collection, who then gave us a call.
<< <i>I understand your concern....that '96 qtr looks more original to me than the '95 half does....I like the detail on the '95, but the surfaces look a little suspect, if 'slabability' is your goal. >>
I've seen a lot of Flowing Hair half dollars that I did not like in slabs. This one was better than many I've seen, but given the fact that no slab grade was given I took it from what I could see as a raw coin.
This is not a rare coin, but high grade, attractive examples are very scarce. To me this piece was a near miss because of the surfaces.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Comments
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Here’s a coin in a similar grade that is in a PCGS EF-45 holder. You can compare the general look between the two pieces.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
What do you think of this coin?
I bought it raw figuring that given its age it would grade. NGC gave it a body bag for "improper cleaning," and it cost me $1,000 to get rid of it back to the dealer from whence it came.
Hi Al:
Just after I sent you that email, someone ordered the 1795 50c. Apparently someone posted the image of it on the "PCGS Chat Room" where it was seen by someone building a type coin collection, who then gave us a call.
Thanks for considering it though.
Best-
Dave W.
<< <i>I understand your concern....that '96 qtr looks more original to me than the '95 half does....I like the detail on the '95, but the surfaces look a little suspect, if 'slabability' is your goal. >>
It was already in a PCGS slab XF 40.
I've seen a lot of Flowing Hair half dollars that I did not like in slabs. This one was better than many I've seen, but given the fact that no slab grade was given I took it from what I could see as a raw coin.
This is not a rare coin, but high grade, attractive examples are very scarce. To me this piece was a near miss because of the surfaces.