Home› U.S. Coin Forum

New Morgan Dollar Purchase, guess the grade...

ashelandasheland Posts: 23,344 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
I just got this one online, it seems undergraded for what the slab says.
What do you think?
image
image
The seller has a return policy which is nice.
I think I'll like this one, though.

My YouTube Channel

Comments

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,260 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 1902-O dollar comes fully struck fairly often. It's much easier to find with full strike than the 1904-O.

    I guress since you say this thing is over graded I'll say it says MS-64 on the label. Given the dull look and the flat breast feathers, I'd only grade it MS-62.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Kdog08Kdog08 Posts: 771
    64
  • al410al410 Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭✭
    Very hard to tell from those pics, but I would say atleast 64, the fields cheeks, everything is so clean, maybe 65, i just can't tell from those pics.
    AL
  • TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,054 ✭✭✭
    MS63

    image
  • bstat1020bstat1020 Posts: 2,157 ✭✭


    << <i>MS63 >>



    I agree with Gator Boy. MS63
    Madelyn's Birth Year Registry Set, Sophia's Birth Year Registry Set, My 10 Best Coins
  • JJMJJM Posts: 8,040 ✭✭✭✭✭
    63
    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It all comes down to luster, which is hard to gauge from the photos. I'll take a wild guess with 63.
    My Roosevelt Dime Registry Set
  • metalmeistermetalmeister Posts: 4,587 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Undergraded hmmm.
    Looks weak struck 65
    Slab says 64?
    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • NH484000NH484000 Posts: 591 ✭
    Slab says 64
    Looking to buy Morgans in ACG, INS, IGA, Old PCI photo, and Hannes Tulving holders.
  • RedTigerRedTiger Posts: 5,608 ✭
    I vote 63.
    Investment blog: gold, stocks and more
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,274 ✭✭✭
    MS64 (due to the typical weak O-Mint strike)
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • LotsoLuckLotsoLuck Posts: 3,786 ✭✭✭
    The stab is 64
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,996 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS63.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,801 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS64 with a weak strike that keeps it from 65. New Orleans had plenty of this
    date with a strong strike, but that coin sure does look "clean" as in no cheek hits.

    bob
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • robkoolrobkool Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS64... According to NGC.
    Ebay items for sale Current BIN's / The Kingdom Collection
  • HighReliefHighRelief Posts: 3,675 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would give it 64.
  • bouchardaboucharda Posts: 2,941


    << <i> it seems undergraded for what the slab says. >>



    If you think it's undergraded why would you mention the return policy....Would you return an undergraded coin?

    Pics are tough but maybe a weak strike 64 (or a 58)
  • tmoneyeaglestmoneyeagles Posts: 442
    If you think it undergraded it might be an AU58.
    I am going to just take a shot in the dark with this one, MS63
  • tightbudgettightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭
    64
  • SUMORADASUMORADA Posts: 4,797 ✭

    NGC MS66
    coins on ebay
  • dizzyfoxxdizzyfoxx Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭
    63ish
    image...There's always time for coin collecting. image
  • EdscoinEdscoin Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭
    NGC 64 and I would agree.
    ED
    .....................................................
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,064 ✭✭✭✭✭
    64 seems most likely grade. Too weakly struck for 65, as 1902-O is available with a full strike.
    John
    Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I, too, agree with the MS64 assessment. It looks lovely.
  • ArizonaJackArizonaJack Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭
    64
    " YOU SUCK " Awarded 5/18/08
  • RollermanRollerman Posts: 1,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 1902 O Morgan is usually an unattractive coin due to weak strike and mediocre luster! (Some one said the 1904 O is also this way, but the '04 is more common in attractive condition than the '02 O by far).
    I assume, due to lack of abrasions, you thought this coin should have gone MS65, but the holder sports the correct grade of MS64 UNLESS the luster is even more subdued than it appears, in which case a grade of MS63 wouldn't be too far out fo line. I like it as a 64 myself.
    Pete
    "Ain't None of Them play like him (Bix Beiderbecke) Yet."
    Louis Armstrong
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,344 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for the replies.
    It is a 64 (old slab)
    image
    I wonder mainly how the luster will look. The lighting appears to be dim.
    Thanks everyone!

    My YouTube Channel

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...