Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

What's the Hardest Standard Issue Topps Baseball Card to Find Centered?

55 Freese? 69 Brock? I am talking so bad you just can't find one, i.e. the second series 66 topps football C.L.
Kiss me once, shame on you.
Kiss me twice.....let's party.

Comments

  • Options
    DrKDrK Posts: 58 ✭
    1955 Topps Gene Freese or 1955 Topps Sherm Lollar. They are both nearly impossible.
  • Options
    jeff8877jeff8877 Posts: 1,164 ✭✭✭
    The 55 Freese is pretty tough. This is the best one I have found and have been looking for a 7 for a while.

    Jeff


    image
  • Options
    I don't know if this card is widely considered to be a toughie or not....... but I don't think I've ever seen a '66 Topps Clemente #300 that is perfectly centered AND does not have a significant tilt.
    'Sir, I realize it's been difficult for you to sleep at night without your EX/MT 1977 Topps Tom Seaver, but I swear to you that you'll get it safe and sound.'
    -CDs Nuts, 1/20/14

    *1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
    *Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
  • Options
    SidePocketSidePocket Posts: 2,901 ✭✭✭
    66 Clemente - not perfectly centered but pretty close.

    image

    "Molon Labe"

  • Options
    Typical bad centering on these two guys. From what I've seen on the '75 minis posted lately, most of that whole set could be thrown into the mix.


    image
  • Options
    1965 Topps Charlie Smith is tough

  • Options
    jimq112jimq112 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭
    1971 536 claude raymond is pretty hard to find centered also
    image
  • Options
    WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I would think every set has one.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • Options
    heritageheritage Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭
    I know with my 1967 topps baseball. There are more than one card but I think the # 609 Tommy John is a bear to fined high end and centered.
  • Options
    WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    in the 65 topps set another was walt bond and sonny siebert.

    Not sure about the Smith being hard to find centered. I thought it was more difficult
    in finding a specimen in 8 or better. centering could have been a reason.


    I remember seeing many lower grade ones centered.

    Bob Cerv in the 61 set was hard too from what I remember as was the Sheldon.


    Steve

    Good for you.
  • Options
    RipublicaninMassRipublicaninMass Posts: 10,051 ✭✭✭
    59 billy pierce
  • Options
    otwcardsotwcards Posts: 5,291 ✭✭✭
    Not a super toughie, but 1954 Topps Ben Wade has always been a PitA to find dead on without print issues. The centered one always seem to have print issues and the ones without the print issues are always off center.
  • Options
    purduepetepurduepete Posts: 791 ✭✭✭
    I still haven't found a well centered 1973 5th series Checklist (#588) card yet....
    Tom

    Collecting: Topps 1952-79, Bowman 1952-55, OPC 1965-71, and Pre-War White Sox cards
  • Options
    gemintgemint Posts: 6,295 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I still haven't found a well centered 1973 5th series Checklist (#588) card yet.... >>



    Mine isn't great on centering but was good enough to meet the 9 criteria.

    image
  • Options
    gemintgemint Posts: 6,295 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 1969 Seaver isn't hard to find in high grade but it is hard to find without a tilt. I've seen a few 9s without the tilt but that's about it. The first 8 I owned didn't have a noticeable tilt. Unfortunately it had scribble indentations on the surface that PSA missed so I turned it in for grading credits. The 8 I have now does have a tilt.

    image
  • Options
    swartz1swartz1 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭
    1978 topps #36


    Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
    - uncut


    Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
  • Options
    in the 1980 topps: #451 Indians Team card.


    Only 5 cards graded by the pop report. I had two graded 6 and 8. There is only 2 @ Psa 9 /none higher. I went thru 50+ to find those two with a decent centering.
    succesful deals :richtree, Bosox1976, Bkritz, mknez, SOM, cardcounter2, ddfamf, cougar701, mrG, Griffins : thanks All

    Go Phillies
  • Options
    Funny you should mention that card, James. I have a 1980 Topps set in NM or better that I put together myself, and the Indians team card is the only card I am missing. Has been for months.
    I guess it's not a coincidence!
    'Sir, I realize it's been difficult for you to sleep at night without your EX/MT 1977 Topps Tom Seaver, but I swear to you that you'll get it safe and sound.'
    -CDs Nuts, 1/20/14

    *1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
    *Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
  • Options
    Apparently it was a bottom corner of a sheet. Most cut wrong.
    succesful deals :richtree, Bosox1976, Bkritz, mknez, SOM, cardcounter2, ddfamf, cougar701, mrG, Griffins : thanks All

    Go Phillies
  • Options
    otwcardsotwcards Posts: 5,291 ✭✭✭
    Of the more recent sets, the '81 Reggie is a toughie... There are also a couple of tough ones in the '86 Topps (top/bottom centering being the culprit).
  • Options
    JVetteJVette Posts: 206 ✭
    The 1962 Roger Maris is tough to find centered.
    And the 1965 Charlie Smith is also tough.
    - Jack
  • Options
    lbcoach20lbcoach20 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭
    '73 Topps Joe Morgan. Pretty tough. The whole set has centering issues......
  • Options
    WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Jack

    Hi, hope you have been well.

    Is the Smith tuff to find centered or tuff to find in the 8 grade?

    I always thought it was abundant centered, just scarce in 8 or above.

    Or is the fact it is hard to find centered the reason it was scarce to find in 8 and above?

    I thought cards like Lynch, Bond, and Siebert were harder to find centered.


    Steve

    Good for you.
  • Options
    RedHeart54RedHeart54 Posts: 2,301 ✭✭✭
    It's pretty obvious after all these years but the '79 Ozzie rookie has always been tough to find centered (AND without printing imperfections).
  • Options
    WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    What about the 78 Molitor? Doesn't that usually have a ink smudge?

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • Options
    AllenAllen Posts: 7,167 ✭✭✭
    57-58 Topps Bill Russell?
  • Options
    jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,961 ✭✭✭✭
    1978 Nolan Ryan
  • Options
    StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    1975 Larry Haney, just a common, but L/R centering is off on a high percent that I have seen.
  • Options
    jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,893 ✭✭✭✭
    The 76 Brett is impossible to find with perfect centering and or no tilt! Printing defects too.............
    76 Lefty Grove is another one that is a centering nightmare.................
    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • Options
    Nathaniel1960Nathaniel1960 Posts: 2,344 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1975 Claudell Washington if I remember now is the hardest 75 to find centered. 66 Perry is tuff too.

    I own a 59 PSA 9 (oc) Billy Pierce. Sweet card.
    Kiss me once, shame on you.
    Kiss me twice.....let's party.
  • Options
    JVetteJVette Posts: 206 ✭
    Hi Steve -
    Things are going great!!

    I think centering is one of the major reasons the 1965 Charlie Smith is so tough to find in an 8.
    Many of the 6's and 7's are clean, crisp and fresh - just off center.
    I assume the result of submitter requesting NQs.
    At least that's been my experience.

    All the best - Jack
  • Options
    CrimsonTiderCrimsonTider Posts: 1,381 ✭✭✭
    1992 Topps Mitch Webster, from my sources, they say that when a PSA10 finally hits the market that it will go for 1000+!!!!
    collecting Dale Murphy and OPC
  • Options
    schr1stschr1st Posts: 1,677 ✭✭
    1957 Colavito was always a toughie for me.
    Who is Rober Maris?
Sign In or Register to comment.