The Cheerios Dollar
MrEureka
Posts: 24,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
Everyone focuses on the tail feathers, but I never noticed how much more detail there is on the the wing. Pretty wild!
Photos from http://www.smalldollars.com/.
Photos from http://www.smalldollars.com/.
Andy Lustig
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
0
Comments
never noticed that. man, every feather has lines in it. Even the Neck feathers are textured.
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
<< <i>never noticed that. man, every feather has lines in it. Even the Neck feathers are textured. >>
I think the neck feathers stand out more becasue the neck on the regular issue is completely smooth.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.americanlegacycoins.com
<< <i>Why was the pattern ditched in favor of what we ended up with? >>
Answer is in the third paragraph.
It would make sense if, as Rogers was trying to make the tail feathers appear more white by removing detail, he would do the same to the neck, which is white on the actual bird.
TD
<< <i>Wow, that is indeed fairly remarkable. I never did buy one when I should have. >>
I was not in the game when these were discovered. How much were they when they first started selling? Thanks
This kind of stuff is why I love this place.
THANK YOU!
Mercury
<< <i>I cant tell you how many times I have said this.
This kind of stuff is why I love this place.
THANK YOU!
Mercury >>
I've got a whole bag of "You Sucks" if your in need of one right now
Thats great. I have never had one. I will take as many as you can spare!
Mercury
<< <i>That is some strong detail on the rest of the eagle. I always thought it was just the tail... Thanks for sharing. >>
I always emphasized the lack of detailing in the tail feathers over the reduced detailing in the wings because it is very difficult to say "Reduced detailing in the wings" without running pictures of both to show the difference between the two. People who have only one variety often cannot visualize the other. Think of the various years of Seated Liberty halves where the "Small mintmark" in one year is the "Large mintmark" in a different year.
Saying "No detailing in the tail" vs. "Strong angled detailing in the tail" is different. It's an either/or situation.
TD