Got outbid by Mets-71 again
This guy is amazing. He had 561 auctions just in the last 30 days and won everyone. What kind of max bids do you put on an auction to win every single auction? He has been doing this for a couple years now and I can not recall him ever losing an auction. I bid $288 on a 1963 Topps # 34 Schofield PSA 8 and still got outbid. I have even had him outbid me on a card and the next time the same card came up on ebay he outbid me again.
0
Comments
He always snipes (as do I) and he sets his snipe at an unimaginably high price that I am positive no one else would ever consider bidding.
He has NEVER lost and I bet he never will.
mathew
drugs of choice
NHL hall of fame rookies
<< <i>He apparently has a large (and well off) clientele. >>
Either that or he has one amazing collection.
mathew
drugs of choice
NHL hall of fame rookies
Mike
/s/ JackWESQ
John
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
I do know this, he pays fast and he pays with a MO or check.
I have sold to him at least 10 times.
Steve
<< <i>Yeah win he actually hits another "crazy" bidder with a silly high proxy i am sure he will adjust some. I don't think even guys like this want to pay 5K for a 1968 common PSA 9. >>
I wouldn't bet against it. Al seems to be of the mind that if he wants it, it's his. I've seen him pay absolutely stupid prices on some low pops in the '71 set. I'm talking 8-10x OVER the last recorded sale. The one that stands out was a pop 4 card that he had already won for $97 and $63 during the previous 18 months then he ran into another bidder and won the card for over $675! So, it's not like he bids high on stuff he needs. He already had at least 2 of the card. Even cost averaging, it doesn't make too much sense...
Steve
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
<< <i>If he is never outbid People must bid against that guy for fun just to cost him money! >>
They can't. He snipes and never places a low ball "placer" bid to show his interest in an item.
mathew
drugs of choice
NHL hall of fame rookies
"If he is never outbid People must bid against that guy for fun just to cost him money"!
What a crappy thing to do or say.
Steve
"Molon Labe"
<< <i>If he is never outbid People must bid against that guy for fun just to cost him money! >>
C&C - so wrong to do, even though we all know you jest. Just the same, I'll let you know when I list my next set of cards from the series he and I were competing on earlier in the year. Hope you win...I could use the dough. Oh yeah, I'll let you know my reserve so you can start your bid there...
Nothing wrong with a good collector who knows what he needs for the collection and who follows through with the auction. If Mr Mets 71 is on the board, hello to you and let us know if the collection is ever available to the public. Oh, and good job on the '64 stand ups. You caught some of us napping on some well centered low pop 8's this year.
1975 mini's
1954 Wilson Franks
<< <i>Mets-71 (Al) is a big time collector, I'm not so sure if he is a seller too.
I do know this, he pays fast and he pays with a MO or check.
I have sold to him at least 10 times.
Steve >>
hope he is careful...ever see "THAT" sign in the post office?
<< <i>It really bugs me when people hoard multiple copies of the same card in the same grade. What's the point, other than to be a jerk to other collectors? >>
Building multiple sets perhaps? There is a member here that posts mainly on the set registry forum with the ID MintMoondog who I believe has 5 graded 1975 Topps Mini sets, and I'm reasonably sure he isn't the only person to ever attempt more than one set. Maybe be a little more careful how you carelessly toss around the word jerk.
Steve
I think mickey71 buys mostly Mantle, Mays, and Aaron and has multiple copies of the same card. What's wrong with that?
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
<< <i>I'm not sure why anyone should care what someone else wants to collect or why they are buying something. But suggesting someone only buy one of a card or they are a jerk is inappropriate. >>
I don't know if this is the case, but there's been hijinks between registry collectors where one collector will intentionally block another by bidding up or buying cards they know that their competitors need.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>I don't know if this is the case, but there's been hijinks between registry collectors where one collector will intentionally block another by bidding up or buying cards they know that their competitors need. >>
Someday I hope I am of the means that I can buy a baseball card for no other reason than to prevent someone else from owning it.
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
<< <i>Building multiple sets perhaps? There is a member here that posts mainly on the set registry forum with the ID MintMoondog who I believe has 5 graded 1975 Topps Mini sets, and I'm reasonably sure he isn't the only person to ever attempt more than one set. Maybe be a little more careful how you carelessly toss around the word jerk. >>
Read my post again. I didn't call anyone a jerk. I asked a question. I love the holier than thou way that so many people come across on this board. If I want your opinion, I'll ask for it.
<< <i>Read my post again. I didn't call anyone a jerk. I asked a question. I love the holier than thou way that so many people come across on this board. If I want your opinion, I'll ask for it. >>
Your post made you sound like a whiny baby. Too bad if you dont like hearing it. Now bid higher and stop crying.
Edited to add: I'll give my opinion whenever I like. Especially to point out a whiny baby.
"Molon Labe"
someday, i wanna be a tycoon, too.
This hobby needs more collectors like this, it seems to me a lot of people wants the sportscard market to collapse , and if this happens a lot of people will have kindling for the fireplace.
We need collectors and dealers like these two collectors to keep the hobby going and to keep fair market value. We NEED collectors/dealers that pay above what the book says it's worth or what the last auction recorded or average that the VCP says it is. This is how the hobby stays alive.
For the hobby to survive something has to go up in value, because if everything is bought at 10 to 20% less than what the last one sold for, well you figure it out. JMHO
off the soap box.
Edited to add: I'll give my opinion whenever I like. Especially to point out a whiny baby.
Nick, maybe if you spent more time being less of a douche, and less time being more of a douche then you wouldn't be such a douche.
<< <i>Your post made you sound like a whiny baby. Too bad if you dont like hearing it. Now bid higher and stop crying.
Edited to add: I'll give my opinion whenever I like. Especially to point out a whiny baby.
Nick, maybe if you spent more time being less of a douche, and less time being more of a douche then you wouldn't be such a douche. >>
There should be an online rule stating that anytime a grown man calls another grown man a 'douche', or any derivative thereof, on a message board they should have to spend five minutes staring at themselves in the mirror and mouthing the words 'What the hell has happened to me?'
Steve
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
<< <i>Nick, maybe if you spent more time being less of a douche, and less time being more of a douche then you wouldn't be such a douche. >>
RonBurgundy was right about you last week when he said that you add nothing of substance around here. I am so glad he put you in your place.
Don't judge me, douche.
<< <i>Your post made you sound like a whiny baby. Too bad if you dont like hearing it. Now bid higher and stop crying.
Edited to add: I'll give my opinion whenever I like. Especially to point out a whiny baby.
Nick, maybe if you spent more time being less of a douche, and less time being more of a douche then you wouldn't be such a douche. >>
Lee - more or less of a douche isn't the issue - douchebaggyness is in the eye of the beholder.
Steve
<< <i>This thread has potential. >>
Bag it, Steve . . .