Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

my group rip low lights :^(

OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
someones gonna get some good cards.. I sure didn't
this was the best of a bad situation
image
image
image
image

Comments

  • billwaltonsbeardbillwaltonsbeard Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭✭
    What are you talking about?? That's one of the best rips ever!!
    My cards on COMC
  • MBMiller25MBMiller25 Posts: 6,057 ✭✭
    Is this the BBCE recession rip that your showing here?
  • SportsamericaSportsamerica Posts: 990 ✭✭
    Are you a Schmidt fan you would love this...

    I always loved when they put the player in the old uniform and then the new team around (Joe Morgan)
    Cory
    ----------------------
    Working on:
    Football
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
    1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
    1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)

    Baseball
    1938 Goudey (56.25%)
    1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
    1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
    1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
    1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    yeah.. I like that too.. the morgan card... it is cool..
    the lee smith is nice but has wax on the reverse

    the baines has
    a shot at a 10 I think

    lots of schmidts thats for sure..
    no big rookies.. I hoped for at least 1
  • lsutigers1973lsutigers1973 Posts: 11,093 ✭
    Check the back of the 82 Fleer Lee Smith and see if it is the corrected (very rare) version. The Cubs emblem in top left corner is reversed in the error (more common) version.
  • GoDodgersFanGoDodgersFan Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭
    Thanks for sharing.

    Brings back some good memories.
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    it is the error version
  • slantycouchslantycouch Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭
    That was the first thing I thought when I saw the Smith - glad its the error!
  • BarfvaderBarfvader Posts: 2,859 ✭✭✭✭
    So then the corrected one is harder to come by?

    Just wondering as it got me to look in my partial set and this is mine.

    image
    image

    Jeff

    Miscut Museum

    My Mess

  • lsutigers1973lsutigers1973 Posts: 11,093 ✭


    << <i>So then the corrected one is harder to come by? >>



    Unless my brain is confused due to lack of beer, yes the corrected one is more rarerererer. I know I busted a box recently and pulled 3 Smith errors. I am either wrong about the error being common or I struck it rich on that box.
  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>So then the corrected one is harder to come by? >>



    Unless my brain is confused due to lack of beer, yes the corrected one is more rarerererer. I know I busted a box recently and pulled 3 Smith errors. I am either wrong about the error being common or I struck it rich on that box. >>



    In the pop report the 'logo reversed' variation has far fewer examples graded, FWIW.
  • slantycouchslantycouch Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭
    I think the error is more rare. Neither seem to command all that much value, but the error is something different at least.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Oaksey

    I thought you did pretty good.

    What cards did you not get that you were wanting?
    Mattingly, Boggs and Sandberg?

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I think the backs of those fleers can be cleaned of wax, they are somewhat glossy enough.

    Try a used fabric softener thingy.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    yeah.. or clemens, puckett, ripken rookies
    an 86 donruss canseco pull would be fun..
    pulling an 83 kittle would be awesome for me
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    I think best case is a 9 either way.. whether I get the wax off or not..
    and a little pressure line on the top front border.. very hard to see
    image
    image
  • lsutigers1973lsutigers1973 Posts: 11,093 ✭


    << <i>In the pop report the 'logo reversed' variation has far fewer examples graded, FWIW. >>



    The correct version is the rarer version. The pop report is skewed. I am assuming the reason is that the error version is fairly common and more corrected vversions have been subbed. The error version is no different than any other common in the set.
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    pull crap.. it is super rare.. and can be had for $47
  • lsutigers1973lsutigers1973 Posts: 11,093 ✭


    << <i>pull crap.. it is super rare.. and can be had for $47 >>



    I will gladly give you $0.47 for it.
  • swartz1swartz1 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭
    probably wanting one of the big two...

    Henderson or Ripken...

    Someone will get it...better luck next time...


    Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
    - uncut


    Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    yeah.. that woulda been fun..
    it was still fun.. just anti climactic
Sign In or Register to comment.