Ebay seller to avoid - codyp2000
VitoCo1972
Posts: 6,130 ✭✭✭
Please note I wouldn't ever start a thread like this without doing research beyond the issue that I had with the seller. So I had a PM Chat with Storm last night who uncovered other issues to back up my small-time issue with this seller - codyp2000
Here's what happened yesterday:
At 10am I saw a card listed as:
1957 TOPPS #94 RAYMOND BERRY COLTS ROOKIE VG...and it was a BIN for $25
So I looked at the picture and the card looked good. I figured it had minor paper loss on the back or something. Here is the link
Ray Berry
I sent him a question:
"Is the card photo the one that I would be receiving? I couldn't tell from the way it's described. Thanks."
He replied:
"YES-all cards are, sellers must post it if they use stock photos."
So about 2 hours later, I sold something and had the money in my paypal account so I go back to pick up the card and he changed the description to: 1957 TOPPS #94 RAYMOND BERRY COLTS ROOKIE EX...and DOUBLED the price from $25 to $50
So I sent him a question:
"Did you just double the price on this? I just came back to buy it."
He replies:
"Yes the grade was typed in wrong. Thanks for the heads up. Bill "
So I reply:
"Oh come on. That's a bit below board, don't you think? It's an EX card. I was asking an honest question to confirm it was the card I wanted for my set. I can't do this for more than $30. I would appreciate you reconsidering. Thank you "
And he comes back with:
"Hi Mike- Im not trying to punish you, but a mistake was made during typing, if you had bought it before Id have had no choice but to sell it for that. But fact o9f the matter is; until you buy it, it's my card to do as I want. It's an open market and others are available if you dont want it. Look at this "Nrmint" one for $75. 1957 Topps #94 Raymond Berry RC Baltimore Colts HOF NM Item number: 270330526199 Mine is otherwise nrmint/mint with a quarter inch surface wrinkle that I couldnt see without a magnifying glass. Regards....Bill"
So I finish with:
"Bill, I'm a low limit player in the game of card collecting, so this won't hurt you in the least...but I'll be adding you to my blocked list for buying and selling. Not only do I feel you were trying to squeeze me as a potential buyer for more money, but by mentioning that you noticed a small surface wrinkle (thus insuring that the card would grade VG - which was your original description by the way) has now convinced me that you're not someone to do business with. It's a tough economy out there and sellers like you will surely be the first to go under. I wish you no success in the future. "
And he replies:
"Ok GOOD. Same here."
Storm then did some research and uncovered the following:
Toolhaus liting for this seller
and he came to the following conclusion:
Some of his FB is about wrinkles and creases that
were not advertised.
That toolhaus run only went back a couple+ years;
timed out.
His responses to complainers show he is a piece of GARBAGE.
The guy is NG.
Now, as for my issue...I wouldn't have an HUGE issue with the guy if he simply entered a NM card in as VG and took time after my question to inspect the card...although I would expect maybe a small olive branch on the price...but once he disclosed the surface wrinkle which wasn't listed in the original description AFTER doubling the price, my mind was made up that the seller isn't worth dealing with.
Here's what happened yesterday:
At 10am I saw a card listed as:
1957 TOPPS #94 RAYMOND BERRY COLTS ROOKIE VG...and it was a BIN for $25
So I looked at the picture and the card looked good. I figured it had minor paper loss on the back or something. Here is the link
Ray Berry
I sent him a question:
"Is the card photo the one that I would be receiving? I couldn't tell from the way it's described. Thanks."
He replied:
"YES-all cards are, sellers must post it if they use stock photos."
So about 2 hours later, I sold something and had the money in my paypal account so I go back to pick up the card and he changed the description to: 1957 TOPPS #94 RAYMOND BERRY COLTS ROOKIE EX...and DOUBLED the price from $25 to $50
So I sent him a question:
"Did you just double the price on this? I just came back to buy it."
He replies:
"Yes the grade was typed in wrong. Thanks for the heads up. Bill "
So I reply:
"Oh come on. That's a bit below board, don't you think? It's an EX card. I was asking an honest question to confirm it was the card I wanted for my set. I can't do this for more than $30. I would appreciate you reconsidering. Thank you "
And he comes back with:
"Hi Mike- Im not trying to punish you, but a mistake was made during typing, if you had bought it before Id have had no choice but to sell it for that. But fact o9f the matter is; until you buy it, it's my card to do as I want. It's an open market and others are available if you dont want it. Look at this "Nrmint" one for $75. 1957 Topps #94 Raymond Berry RC Baltimore Colts HOF NM Item number: 270330526199 Mine is otherwise nrmint/mint with a quarter inch surface wrinkle that I couldnt see without a magnifying glass. Regards....Bill"
So I finish with:
"Bill, I'm a low limit player in the game of card collecting, so this won't hurt you in the least...but I'll be adding you to my blocked list for buying and selling. Not only do I feel you were trying to squeeze me as a potential buyer for more money, but by mentioning that you noticed a small surface wrinkle (thus insuring that the card would grade VG - which was your original description by the way) has now convinced me that you're not someone to do business with. It's a tough economy out there and sellers like you will surely be the first to go under. I wish you no success in the future. "
And he replies:
"Ok GOOD. Same here."
Storm then did some research and uncovered the following:
Toolhaus liting for this seller
and he came to the following conclusion:
Some of his FB is about wrinkles and creases that
were not advertised.
That toolhaus run only went back a couple+ years;
timed out.
His responses to complainers show he is a piece of GARBAGE.
The guy is NG.
Now, as for my issue...I wouldn't have an HUGE issue with the guy if he simply entered a NM card in as VG and took time after my question to inspect the card...although I would expect maybe a small olive branch on the price...but once he disclosed the surface wrinkle which wasn't listed in the original description AFTER doubling the price, my mind was made up that the seller isn't worth dealing with.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Edit: Ok, I also see where he chnged the grade in the listing from VG to EX, so that explains the price increase...
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>Is $25 signficantly lower than the card is worth? The timing does sound suspicious, though, but if $25 was a "steal" for the card maybe he is telling the truth...I can't understand why a seller would double the price on a card just because he received an e-mail about it. >>
I think $25 is fair for a nice looking VG example of the card...I just wanted it for TTM anyway. My whole issue really centers on the undisclosed surface wrinkle which is what makes the card VG to begin with. Basically the seller realized he had a good looking card and was trying to squeeze EX money out of it knowing that it had an attribute that insures it's a VG card.
My Podcast - Now FEATURED on iTunes
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
"Molon Labe"
Mike
------
stupid print dots
Sellers who call their PITA customers nasty names in FB are ONLY
damaging themselves.
I KNOW how tempting it is, but it DOES hurt sales.
***edited because I'm not certain he used another ID. I am still certain he is a turd.
Collector of Pittsburgh Pirates cards for a slightly less stupid reason.
My Pirates Collection
On the subject of the wrinkle, even though Joe Orlando has written in at least one SMR magazine that a wrinkle automatically knocks a card down to a 4, I have had at least 2 wrinkled cards come back from PSA in 5 (EX) holders. I've also had a GAI Mint 9 with a very noticeale wrinkle right down the middle of the card.
What I'm saying here is that grading is strictly subjective. The "VG rule" for wrinkled cards is an arbitrary standard imposed by PSA and others, I'm sure; but it still remains a matter of opinion. That said, the seller most definitely should have mentioned the wrinkle in the listing.
<< <i>I agree that the seller mishandled the situation and Mike remained professional and civil throughout.
On the subject of the wrinkle, even though Joe Orlando has written in at least one SMR magazine that a wrinkle automatically knocks a card down to a 4, I have had at least 2 wrinkled cards come back from PSA in 5 (EX) holders. I've also had a GAI Mint 9 with a very noticeale wrinkle right down the middle of the card.
What I'm saying here is that grading is strictly subjective. The "VG rule" for wrinkled cards is an arbitrary standard imposed by PSA and others, I'm sure; but it still remains a matter of opinion. That said, the seller most definitely should have mentioned the wrinkle in the listing. >>
Ive got a perfect centered, perfect corners, Griffey Upper Deck Rookie with a surface wrinkle on the back, graded a 6. Got the same thing in a Frank Thomas, graded a 5, so they are not consistent on that either
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
Ripken, Brooks & Frank Robinson, Old Orioles, Sweet Spot Autos, older Redskins - Riggins, Sonny, Baugh etc and anything that catches my eye.
My ghetto sportscard webpage...All Scans - No Lists!!! Stinky Linky
CodyP, Kruk, Kit Young, etc ad nueseum.
Steve
Sellers who call their PITA customers nasty names in FB are ONLY
damaging themselves.
I KNOW how tempting it is, but it DOES hurt sales.
Yup, I'll never buy from them.
Those that act that way never get my bids.
Steve
RB
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
Dave
1957 Topps 99% 7.40 GPA
Hank Aaron Basic PSA 7-8(75%)
resist sharing my run in with codyp2000 with you-all.
About 6 years ago when I was trying to complete my run of Topps sets I won 14 auctions
for 1957 Topps commons from Bill. When the package arrived it included 12 cards and a
refund for 1 card. Apparently he doesn't have very good organizational skills either.
I had bought a few cards from him before so I knew they would be slightly overgraded
but they still fit in OK with my EX set.
I emailed him for a couple of weeks about the missing card with no reply. I finally
called him and he said he would mail the card the next day. 4 weeks later I still
hadn't received the card. I left him negative feedback and he retalites with 2 NEGS -
Buyer Dec-09-02 17:59: Won 14 items on 10/13...Received only 12...Called seller but still no card.
Reply: TALKED TO YOU ON SATURDAY CARD WAS SENT MONDAY- WHATS THE PROBLEM?
Follow-up: We talked on Nov 3rd...125+ Neg Seller can't keep his ripoffs straight
Seller: codyp2000 - BUYER CLAIMED CARD NOT RECEIVED - NEGGED ME OVER A LOST CARD THAT I SHIPPED
Reply: Retaliatory FB from Seller with 200 Neg/Neutrals...Won 14 items, only rec'd 12
Follow-up: When I sent your Virdon Card Nov 4th you were only missing one, Now its 2? IDIOT
Seller: codyp2000 - HE CALLED ABOUT OVERLOOKED CARD, I SENT IT, HE NEGS ME A MONTH LATER GO FIGURE
Reply: If item was received, Neg FB would not have been left...It's not a hard concept
Needless to say I wasn't happy with the negative feedbacks or the name calling but it
was tame compared to his venomous e-mails. Over the course of the next few weeks we
exchanged a few more negatives until he finally realized that as a seller they were
hurting him more than they were me -
Buyer: Didn't receive an item & left Neg FB, Seller retaliated on 2 RECEIVED items
Reply: YOUR "MISSING" CARD WAS SENT IMMEDIATELY- YOURE JUST AN PUTZ
Follow-up: Received 3 Neg FB's, Abusive E-mails, & Name Calling...Not Received - THE ITEM
Seller: codyp2000 - HE CALLED ABOUT OVERLOOKED CARD, I SENT IT, HE NEGS ME A MONTH LATER - MORON
Reply: 3rd Retalitory Neg FB left by Abusive, Profane, eBay sanctioned "Power Seller".
Buyer: Didn't receive an item & left Neg FB, Seller retaliated on THREE Received items
Reply: YOU CALLED ABOUT AN OVERLOOKED CARD, I SENT IT, THEN NEG ME A MONTH LATER??????
After my experience with this seller the "Power Seller" status seemed to me to be more of an
eBay joke than anything else. I've also got a little better picture of this person since this
encounter from his "ME" page. Whenever I run across one of his auctions I check his ME page
and he always has a picture of his dogs and sometimes a picture of his girlfiend. He has had
at least 3 different ones but just can't seem to hang on to any of them. Before he posted a
picture of his newest girlfriend he had a picture of him with his old girlfriend and he had
pasted a grotesque clownface on her head. I can't imagine why anyone would leave such a
sweetheart.
Deadman's Registry Sets
"Received 3 Neg FB's, Abusive E-mails, & Name Calling...Not Received - THE ITEM "
/////////////////////////////////////////////
Priceless!!!!!!!
------
stupid print dots
Steve
Good morning!
I sent codyp2000 a cordial message:
Dear codyp2000,
Good morning! Just a heads-up! You are a topic of discussion over on the PSA-Collector's Universe message boards:
http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=11&threadid=704091
I thought you would like to join in here?
Sincerely,
Bob
Thought maybe he would come here and defend himself?
Quicksilver Messenger Service - Smokestack Lightning (Live) 1968
Quicksilver Messenger Service - The Hat (Live) 1971
ooops! my bad!
....... lol!
Quicksilver Messenger Service - Smokestack Lightning (Live) 1968
Quicksilver Messenger Service - The Hat (Live) 1971
Rgs,
Greg M.
References:
Onlychild, Ahmanfan, fabfrank, wufdude, jradke, Reese, Jasp, thenavarro
E-Bay id: greg_n_meg
Don't buy the Raymond Berry RC, save yor money till you get back on your feet...
I am sure one will find its way to your house
Link To Scanned 1952 Topps Cards Set is now 90% Complete Plus Slideshows of the 52 Set
"I sent codyp2000 a cordial message:"
Great, we need some drama here. It was getting slow.
Steve
PoppaJ
OT: Micheal Phelps didn't inhale that bong!
rd
Quicksilver Messenger Service - Smokestack Lightning (Live) 1968
Quicksilver Messenger Service - The Hat (Live) 1971
Do not buy from this guy. Just don't.
http://stores.ebay.com/The-Cards-of-Our-Pastime
Prices are negotiable. E-mail: the.cards.of.our.pastime@gmail.com
I'd avoid if possible. Stop watching the listing, it might drop to $30 in a week or 2 if you want to give it a try.
Dave
Bob
Looking for Bob Uecker cards
My Ebay Auctions
~WalterSobchak
I won't buy raw cards from him.
John
<< <i>I had found cards I was looking for but then when I saw the seller, I just pass over them. This guy is a real piece of work. Id love to see him come on these boards. Of course he wouldnt because there is no defense for what he does. >>
I think the slinkie principle would work well if I could just coax him up a flight of stairs...
To be honest, no direction, but...
1966-69 Topps EX+
1975 minis NrMt Kelloggs PSA 9
All Topps Heritage-Master Sets
To be honest, no direction, but...
1966-69 Topps EX+
1975 minis NrMt Kelloggs PSA 9
All Topps Heritage-Master Sets
However..... because of what I have read about him on this forum, I avoid those cards like the plague. Thank you, forum.
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
Thanks
http://stores.ebay.com/The-Cards-of-Our-Pastime
Prices are negotiable. E-mail: the.cards.of.our.pastime@gmail.com