Interesting... I don't think I've ever seen that green & purple tone together and all over. makes me think something's not right with it. In hand and if it was full of luster underneath the color I could probably appreciate it better.
Hey! I'm not passing judgment here... I just haven't seen anything like that before though I do like it. The obverse looks much more like stuff I have seen. I've seen purple like the reverse before but never with the green... it makes me question the previous coins I've seen with purple like that.
I'd like to see it in hand. At one time, I used to like the toning look on the obverse but I have grown past that. The reverse looks interesting enough to like.
In the picture, the obverse isn't exciting, but I would guess it's lustrous and lighter in hand. In that case, I like it as a compliment to a reverse toner, but wouldn't buy the coin for said obverse color.
In the picture, the reverse colors look unoriginal. The purple is off, and the green is even more off. I've never seen that shade on anything silver. Barring perhaps a rare copper sighting, I've never seen it at all. My guess is the shades are wrong in the photo, and the coin could be quite nice. If the colors are realistic, then I would call the coin AT and no, I don't like it. I think the coin has promise, but I wouldn't pay a lot to find out unless there was a nice return policy.
I didn't care for it either time it came up at TT. Just was glad it wasn't an important VAM. It must have been pretty tightly mounted in something for a long time.
I agree that the reverse colors look fishy. It doesn't appear to be a natural progression; the transition between the green and the purple is too hard. And the shades of green and purple are also suspect in my opinion (having spent way, way too much time viewing toned Morgans over the last decade).
I'm a toner fan but this one looks too fishy to me. If I owned it I'd always be wondering whether it was NT or AT---don't think I'd get much enjoyment out of that.
"Gem EOR toners are tangible evidence that the Eighth Dimension does indeed exist." ---Ambrose Bierce, while attending a Heritage Auction at the 1907 Long Beach show
Comments
reverse: no, sorry
www.brunkauctions.com
I don't think I've ever seen that green & purple tone together and all over.
makes me think something's not right with it.
In hand and if it was full of luster underneath the color I could probably appreciate it better.
<< <i>obverse: yes
reverse: no, sorry >>
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Reverse: Absolutely
Hey! I'm not passing judgment here... I just haven't seen anything like that before though I do like it. The obverse looks much more like stuff I have seen. I've seen purple like the reverse before but never with the green... it makes me question the previous coins I've seen with purple like that.
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
<< <i>Obverse: not a chance
Reverse: Absolutely >>
Ditto on both counts; would have to see it in hand to be sure tho.
- Jim
At one time, I used to like the toning look on the obverse but I have grown past that.
The reverse looks interesting enough to like.
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
<< <i>
<< <i>Obverse: not a chance
Reverse: Absolutely >>
Ditto on both counts; would have to see it in hand to be sure tho. >>
I'll go with the opposite on that. I don't like the "Christmas" look.
Cheers, GB
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Obverse: not a chance
Reverse: Absolutely >>
Ditto on both counts; would have to see it in hand to be sure tho. >>
I'll go with the opposite on that. I don't like the "Christmas" look. >>
Wishing you a very Merry Christmas...
I had that coin tracked just because I was curious about the price it would sell for.
Mike
<< <i>
<< <i>obverse: yes
reverse: no, sorry >>
I agree also!!
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
U.S. Army Veteran 1/11 ACR Fulda, Germany
The reverse is also NT and I like it. Wonderful colors and distribution of the colors.
I saw it up but passed without even tracking it.
Toned Coins for sale @ tonedcointrader.com
In the picture, the obverse isn't exciting, but I would guess it's lustrous and lighter in hand. In that case, I like it as a compliment to a reverse toner, but wouldn't buy the coin for said obverse color.
In the picture, the reverse colors look unoriginal. The purple is off, and the green is even more off. I've never seen that shade on anything silver. Barring perhaps a rare copper sighting, I've never seen it at all. My guess is the shades are wrong in the photo, and the coin could be quite nice. If the colors are realistic, then I would call the coin AT and no, I don't like it. I think the coin has promise, but I wouldn't pay a lot to find out unless there was a nice return policy.
U.S. Type Set
but it looks too AT for me to like it. lol
Otherwise that TT pic shows one unappealing Morgan reverse.
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso
–John Adams, 1826
found a Ike silver in the plastic case, last night that has a real bright gold tone on the reed edge.
will get pictures.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
It doesn't appear to be a natural progression; the transition between the green and the purple is too hard.
And the shades of green and purple are also suspect in my opinion (having spent way, way too much time viewing toned Morgans over the last decade).
K
JT
I collect all 20th century series except gold including those series that ended there.
---Ambrose Bierce, while attending a Heritage Auction at the 1907 Long Beach show
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
<< <i>What did it end up selling for? >>
$320