Can I get some thoughts on this 1893S Morgan please.

The pictures below are from the seller. The coin is up for auction at a live auction later this week. I know with key dates, the smart thing to do is to buy it graded. But I wanted to get some thoughts from the folks here. Thanks again!


Chaz
Proud recipient of Y.S. Award on 07/26/08.
Proud recipient of Y.S. Award on 07/26/08.
0
Comments
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
<< <i>well, how about you bid on it and then have the seller submit it for you to pcgs? Then if it comes back graded and slabbed, they can keep the money. However if its bodybagged, you get your money back?? >>
Since he already has your money, this makes no sense.
Avoid this tactic, and avoid that coin.
Visit my son's caringbridge page @ Runner's Caringbridge Page
"To Give Anything Less than Your Best, Is to Sacrifice the Gift" - Steve Prefontaine
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
<< <i>This is one of the easiest coins to authenticate. So if you don't know the diagnostics already, learn them. >>
I know the diagnostics for this year, but I was looking for other opinions. Thanks all.
Proud recipient of Y.S. Award on 07/26/08.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
here is a pcgs 35 for comparison. note the position of the 1 in 1893 centered over a denticle. compare similar positions around the coin. Go to Heritage or TeleTrade and get pix of likely coins that could be altered to give a 93-s like an 1898-s and look for other position matchups. I think you will be ok if you buy it. Make sure that you get a right to return it if you are not happy with it. Might be kind of tough if its an auction.
NGC registry V-Nickel proof #6!!!!
working on proof shield nickels # 8 with a bullet!!!!
RIP "BEAR"
<< <i>I would not chance buying the coin if it isn't slabbed by PCGS or NGC. >>
What's wrong with ANACS, ICG, SEGS or DGS?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i> Am I the only one that thinks it looks like it's been cleaned? >>
Probably not. It looks like it prossibly was dipped, long ago. But not enough to bother me, personally. Looks like a nice solid circ to me, IF it's kosher on the authenticity end. (I don't do enough with Morgans to be a judge of that).
Get it in a PCGS "Genuine" holder, if not a regular slab, and that would be good enough for me.
<< <i>What's wrong with ANACS, ICG, SEGS or DGS? >>
Nothing, from an authentication standpoint. (Except that I am not familiar with DGS).
Franklin-Lover's Forum
<< <i>
<< <i> Am I the only one that thinks it looks like it's been cleaned? >>
Probably not. It looks like it prossibly was dipped, long ago. But not enough to bother me, personally. Looks like a nice solid circ to me, IF it's kosher on the authenticity end. (I don't do enough with Morgans to be a judge of that).
Get it in a PCGS "Genuine" holder, if not a regular slab, and that would be good enough for me.
<< <i>What's wrong with ANACS, ICG, SEGS or DGS? >>
Nothing, from an authentication standpoint. (Except that I am not familiar with DGS). >>
DGS is Dominion Grading Service, they used to be called PCI.
Franklin-Lover's Forum
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i> Am I the only one that thinks it looks like it's been cleaned? >>
Probably not. It looks like it prossibly was dipped, long ago. But not enough to bother me, personally. Looks like a nice solid circ to me, IF it's kosher on the authenticity end. (I don't do enough with Morgans to be a judge of that).
Get it in a PCGS "Genuine" holder, if not a regular slab, and that would be good enough for me.
<< <i>What's wrong with ANACS, ICG, SEGS or DGS? >>
Nothing, from an authentication standpoint. (Except that I am not familiar with DGS). >>
DGS is Dominion Grading Service, they used to be called PCI. >>
Dominion bought the assets of PCI but is a completely different entity. The Dominion grading standards are quite strict and they are generating a following among collectors who are able to make their own decisions. Personally, I rank Dominion very close to PCGS and superior to all of the others.
I expect them to achieve eBay acceptability in the near future.
<< <i>Am I the only one that thinks it looks like it's been cleaned? >>
Am I the only one who thinks someone carved their initials into the cheek?
<< <i>
<< <i>I would not chance buying the coin if it isn't slabbed by PCGS or NGC. >>
What's wrong with ANACS, ICG, SEGS or DGS? >>
They have not achieved the market acceptance that is enjoyed by PCGS and NGC. Therefore, their slabs do not add as much value and marketability to the coin. Since this market acceptance is based on a perception of expertise and consistency, I would only use PCGS or NGC for key date coins that cost a lot of money, and for which a 1 point difference in grade may mean a significant difference in value.