Home U.S. Coin Forum

SLQ "Insert Label Buyers™" Beware... Time To Get Edjumacated or Bleed!

13»

Comments

  • ecichlidecichlid Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I personally don't like the designations FH, FBL, FS, etc., as I have seen coins that truly meet the respective designation; however, there was significant weakness in other areas. I would much rather see a FS, full strike, designation. >>



    All of those designations are silly. I have seen full heads, full bands, etc where the rest of the coin just doesn't make the cut. Why not full horn designations for Buffs? Of course, that would be silly too.

    I don't agree with a "full strike" designation either. The problem is: WHERE DO YOU DRAW THE LINE? Strike is part of the grade equation. Simple as that. The rest is a sucker's game.
    There is no "AT" or "NT". We only have "market acceptable" or "not market acceptable.
  • jomjom Posts: 3,497 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I don't agree with a "full strike" designation either. The problem is: WHERE DO YOU DRAW THE LINE? Strike is part of the grade equation. Simple as that. The rest is a sucker's game. >>



    I agree in that you don't DRAW THE LINE at all. You just let the market price "decide" whether it's worthy. It's really the only way get away from the questionable designations AND problem of "FH but not Full Strike" thing.

    jom

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file