Options
Speaking of liquidity, if a numismatic property is liquid when you buy it, why does it suddenly beco
In another thread, a board member of excessive prominence posted a thread about whether anyone here owns an illiquid numismatic property. I chimed in about my experience, and I see that others have responded as well.
My question is a bit different. If you purchased a numismatic property from a dealer (obviously the item was liquid at that point), why does the item suddenly become illiquid when it gets into the hands of the collector? Is it a matter of the dealer having greater access to the sales outlet for the item, or is it simply because certain items are just not popular? Is it indicative of the lack of a two way market in the numismatic property? Or is it for some other reason?
My question is a bit different. If you purchased a numismatic property from a dealer (obviously the item was liquid at that point), why does the item suddenly become illiquid when it gets into the hands of the collector? Is it a matter of the dealer having greater access to the sales outlet for the item, or is it simply because certain items are just not popular? Is it indicative of the lack of a two way market in the numismatic property? Or is it for some other reason?
Always took candy from strangers
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
0
Comments
Edited to add: As stated in RYK's post, in a few hours I will be purchasing a 1983 silver proof panda for $1,100. The coin consists of 27 grams of .900 silver. Should the panda coins become ice cold in the next few years, it is hard to imagine that I wouldnt be taking a SUBSTANTIAL loss on that coin if I needed to sell it.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
<< <i>In another thread, a board member of excessive prominence posted a thread about whether anyone here owns an illiquid numismatic property. I chimed in about my experience, and I see that others have responded as well.
My question is a bit different. If you purchased a numismatic property from a dealer obviously the item was liquid at that point), why does the item suddenly become illiquid when it gets into the hands of the collector? Is it a matter of the dealer having greater access to the sales outlet for the item, or is it simply because certain items are just not popular? Is it indicative of the lack of a two way market in the numismatic property? Or is it for some other reason? >>
Not true about being liquid when you bought it. The term liquid implies a market with many ready buyers and sellers. Just because you bought it does not mean it had liquidity at the time.
merse
<< <i>In another thread, a board member of excessive prominence >>
Just curious, since you two seem to start most of your posts this way, is it time you just got a room?
believe me, I know what I'm talking about.
I recall some years back that two wealthy collectors would battle over Wisconsin National Bank notes. One of those collectors (actually a married couple) has since passed away. I wonder if demand for the Wisconsin Nationals is as hot today? Anybody know?
liquidity = demand
Demand is the most difficult thing to control or predict in the "market." The thinner the market the less predictable.
K
Chet Krause is unloading his Wisconsin nationals and there are 906 of them in the Lyn Knight's PCDA auction. That market will be dead for years, decades maybe.
"La Vostra Nonna Ha Faccia Del Fungo"