<< <i>Interesting heard....I mean coins. Very nice. >>
luckybucks - To what purpose do you resurrect old threads when you have nothing meaningful to add? If you are enamored with the pics, couldn't you enjoy them privately rather than cluttering up the board?
As I write this, I know this sounds rude and unwelcoming to a new poster, but am I wrong to ask for this courtesy?
<< <i>Interesting heard....I mean coins. Very nice. >>
luckybucks - To what purpose do you resurrect old threads when you have nothing meaningful to add? If you are enamored with the pics, couldn't you enjoy them privately rather than cluttering up the board?
As I write this, I know this sounds rude and unwelcoming to a new poster, but am I wrong to ask for this courtesy?
Edit - guess he's not technically a new poster >>
It is a thread that I found interesting. As long as I do not flame anyone or make inappropriate posts, I can post as I wish. As of now, I do not have means to take pictures of what I have coinwise (IE no QUALITY digital camera). Other people may have never seen this thread / forgotten about it (we have picked up alot of new members since 2008 and this type of thread may have never crossed anyone's mind) Alot of these new members have the means to further contribute in ways that right now I cannot.
In terms of "cluttering the board" as long as there is something of value that others can contribute to / learn from, who cares what year the thread originated from ?
Edit to add: just by bumping up this thread, the contributions have been doubled with some more very nice material.
<< <i>Interesting heard....I mean coins. Very nice. >>
luckybucks - To what purpose do you resurrect old threads when you have nothing meaningful to add? If you are enamored with the pics, couldn't you enjoy them privately rather than cluttering up the board?
As I write this, I know this sounds rude and unwelcoming to a new poster, but am I wrong to ask for this courtesy?
Edit - guess he's not technically a new poster >>
It is a thread that I found interesting. As long as I do not flame anyone or make inappropriate posts, I can post as I wish. As of now, I do not have means to take pictures of what I have coinwise (IE no QUALITY digital camera). Other people may have never seen this thread / forgotten about it (we have picked up alot of new members since 2008 and this type of thread may have never crossed anyone's mind) Alot of these new members have the means to further contribute in ways that right now I cannot.
In terms of "cluttering the board" as long as there is something of value that others can contribute to / learn from, who cares what year the thread originated from ?
Edit to add: just by bumping up this thread, the contributions have been doubled with some more very nice material. >>
While researching and writing my most recent article, I thought a lot about the dates and varieties that are needed, or should be included, in a complete set of Bufflao Nickels 'by date' (and U.S. Mint location). I was astonished that leading guides list the 1935 Doubled Reverse and the claimed 1936-D 'Three and a Half Legs' varieties along with the regular date and mint combinations. These seem obscure to me. Also, as the 1937-D '3 Legs' is a mint error, then should it be included in standard sets 'by date' (and mint)? What are the thoughts on these points of the members of this forum?
renman95
Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
-sm
The Maddy Rae Collection
CURRENT BST OFFERINGS
DDO-1, PCGS-65
DDO-2, ANACS-64
DDO-4, PCGS-65
DDO-6, PCGS-66
DDO-7, PCGS-65
DDR-1, ANACS-63
<< <i>Interesting heard....I mean coins. Very nice. >>
luckybucks - To what purpose do you resurrect old threads when you have nothing meaningful to add? If you are enamored with the pics, couldn't you enjoy them privately rather than cluttering up the board?
As I write this, I know this sounds rude and unwelcoming to a new poster, but am I wrong to ask for this courtesy?
Edit - guess he's not technically a new poster
Coin Club Benefit auctions ..... View the Lots
INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN
https://sites.google.com/view/coins-for-sale/home
Mike
<< <i>
<< <i>Interesting heard....I mean coins. Very nice. >>
luckybucks - To what purpose do you resurrect old threads when you have nothing meaningful to add? If you are enamored with the pics, couldn't you enjoy them privately rather than cluttering up the board?
As I write this, I know this sounds rude and unwelcoming to a new poster, but am I wrong to ask for this courtesy?
Edit - guess he's not technically a new poster
It is a thread that I found interesting. As long as I do not flame anyone or make inappropriate posts, I can post as I wish. As of now, I do not have means to take pictures of what I have coinwise (IE no QUALITY digital camera). Other people may have never seen this thread / forgotten about it (we have picked up alot of new members since 2008 and this type of thread may have never crossed anyone's mind) Alot of these new members have the means to further contribute in ways that right now I cannot.
In terms of "cluttering the board" as long as there is something of value that others can contribute to / learn from, who cares what year the thread originated from ?
Edit to add: just by bumping up this thread, the contributions have been doubled with some more very nice material.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Interesting heard....I mean coins. Very nice. >>
luckybucks - To what purpose do you resurrect old threads when you have nothing meaningful to add? If you are enamored with the pics, couldn't you enjoy them privately rather than cluttering up the board?
As I write this, I know this sounds rude and unwelcoming to a new poster, but am I wrong to ask for this courtesy?
Edit - guess he's not technically a new poster
It is a thread that I found interesting. As long as I do not flame anyone or make inappropriate posts, I can post as I wish. As of now, I do not have means to take pictures of what I have coinwise (IE no QUALITY digital camera). Other people may have never seen this thread / forgotten about it (we have picked up alot of new members since 2008 and this type of thread may have never crossed anyone's mind) Alot of these new members have the means to further contribute in ways that right now I cannot.
In terms of "cluttering the board" as long as there is something of value that others can contribute to / learn from, who cares what year the thread originated from ?
Edit to add: just by bumping up this thread, the contributions have been doubled with some more very nice material. >>
OK I've been duly re "buffed".
<< <i>
One of these days I gonna have to drop a bundle and buy me one of these notes to go with my herd. Beautiful all the way!!!!
<< <i>Coinbuf...that is a very nice Buffalo Nickel.... Cheers, RickO >>
Thanks RickO
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
"You Suck Award" - February, 2015
Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
1913 5C Type 1 PCGS MS65
1938 D/S Buffalo PCGS MS65 CAC
2005-D 5C Speared Bison PCGS MS64
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore...
<< <i>
Awesome!!!!
While researching and writing my most recent article, I thought a lot about the dates and varieties that are needed, or should be included, in a complete set of Bufflao Nickels 'by date' (and U.S. Mint location). I was astonished that leading guides list the 1935 Doubled Reverse and the claimed 1936-D 'Three and a Half Legs' varieties along with the regular date and mint combinations. These seem obscure to me. Also, as the 1937-D '3 Legs' is a mint error, then should it be included in standard sets 'by date' (and mint)? What are the thoughts on these points of the members of this forum?
Classic U.S. Coins for less than $500 each, Part 9: Buffalo Nickels
insightful10{{at}} gmail.com
EAC 6024
JH
Proof Buffalo Registry Set
Capped Bust Quarters Registry Set
Proof Walking Liberty Halves Registry Set
http://macrocoins.com
<< <i>1918-D Tatanka 5C 15% Off Center Mint Error MS65
nice coin