Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Guess the grades on some 62's grades popped

OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
these will be sent in on a 6 card renewal sub in a couple minutes
image
image
image
image

Comments

  • jcdcubsjcdcubs Posts: 341
    7.5
    7.5
    8
    7
  • Piman58Piman58 Posts: 814 ✭✭
    7
    7
    8.5
    6.5
  • milbrocomilbroco Posts: 2,772 ✭✭✭✭
    7.5
    7
    8
    7
    ebay seller name milbroco
    email bcmiller7@comcast.net
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    7. 6. 8. 7


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • ElemenopeoElemenopeo Posts: 2,577 ✭✭

    All 7's.
  • RonBurgundyRonBurgundy Posts: 5,491 ✭✭✭
    7, 7, 7.5, and 7.

    FYI, beware. They absolutely were murder on my last round of 62's.


    RB.
    Ron Burgundy

    Buying Vintage, all sports.
    Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
  • mmyncmmync Posts: 678 ✭
    Your bank's got a nice deposit coming!!
  • Carew29Carew29 Posts: 4,025 ✭✭

    7.5---7
    8-----7.5
  • stevekstevek Posts: 30,166 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Mays is a 6
  • SDavidSDavid Posts: 1,584 ✭✭
    8 7 8 7
  • nam812nam812 Posts: 10,600 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I will defer to Mike (Bosox1976), who is a true 1962 aficionado.
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,566 ✭✭✭✭✭
    7/7/8/7

    That Witt is worth a bundle if it is an 8. How is the bottom edge on #3? It's got the best corners, but the worst PD - but if that edge is true it should still make it. I just sent in a couple Mazeroski's that have a nice shot at 8's, but my Witt's weren't this nice.

    Am not sure if the Mays can get a 7.5 with the fairly common smudge.

    Beautiful cards - that Witt is a beast!

    edit: Nick, you don't have to defer to anybody - you are one of the few who consistently grades '62 cards correctly!
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • leadoff4leadoff4 Posts: 2,392 ✭
    7.5
    7
    8
    7
  • firedawg45firedawg45 Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭
    7
    7
    8
    6

    good luck
    # 2 Pete Rose Master Set , also
    collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
  • RonBurgundyRonBurgundy Posts: 5,491 ✭✭✭
    I would add the 2nd Witt card should be an 8. Just not trusting PSA after what happened to mine. Will post an example later.
    Ron Burgundy

    Buying Vintage, all sports.
    Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    the 2nd witt looks tight to me... the edges look strong
    I think they all look slightly better then the scans reflect
  • SidePocketSidePocket Posts: 2,901 ✭✭✭
    The 2nd Witt seems to have a bunch of red ink spots in the dark background and one in his hair - PD?

    "Molon Labe"

  • chaz43chaz43 Posts: 2,140 ✭✭✭
    PSA 7's. chaz
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    the pd's are really common on the witt.. not sure if it will get a qual.. I hope not
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    overall.. I have to say I am bummed.. not a clue what was recolored
    and the jello is super rare and worthy of a 4-5
    1 1 14086405 NEAR MINT 7 1962 TOPPS 287 GEORGE WITT Card US
    1 2 14086406 NEAR MINT 7 1962 TOPPS 287 GEORGE WITT Card US
    1 3 14086407 N3: EVIDENCE OF RECOLORATION 1962 TOPPS 287 GEORGE WITT Card US
    1 4 14086408 NEAR MINT 7 1962 TOPPS 287 GEORGE WITT Card US
    2 1 14086409 NEAR MINT 7 1962 TOPPS 300 WILLIE MAYS Card US
    3 1 14086410 N0: AUTHENTIC 1962 JELL-O 173 ROBERTO CLEMENTE HAND CUT Card US
  • leadoff4leadoff4 Posts: 2,392 ✭
    Did you buy the Mays off eBay? Nice cards.
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,566 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Dang. Thought you had an 8 in that bunch. Resubmit until you get one. Worth the $$.
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • FlintboyFlintboy Posts: 150
    You have been had my friend......I purchased a 62 Drysdale all star card for 6 bucks raw on Ebay. I dont have alot of experience on 62,s so I had a friend look it over and send it in on a submission for me. I was "praying " for a 7. My friend even agreed that a 7 would be a generous grade. The card came back an 8. Every one of those Witts blows my card out of the water. I really think graders on NOT on the same page when it comes to the 62,s. It sucks that you will have to resubmit those to get the proper grade.
  • nam812nam812 Posts: 10,600 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Anyone who thinks that graders are not familiar with which cards are tough low pops is kidding himself.
  • BuccaneerBuccaneer Posts: 1,794 ✭✭


    << <i>Anyone who thinks that graders are not familiar with which cards are tough low pops is kidding himself. >>



    I agree, you have to protect the Registry.
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,566 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Anyone who thinks that graders are not familiar with which cards are tough low pops is kidding himself. >>



    Amen.
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    I agree.. I thought maybe 2 of them might grab an 8...
    maybe a 7.5 and an 8
    to all be 7's?? I mean I know there is leeway within a grade
    but some were nicer then others
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,566 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There was a visible difference between my Mazeroski's too - I though I'd get a 7, a 7.5, and an 8 (or better yet 7,8,8).

    I got 7,7,7 - sound familiar? Just part of the game I guess.

    If it makes you feel better - I'll give you twice SMR for the nicest of the Witt 7's image
    Mike
    Bosox1976
Sign In or Register to comment.